 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Pet Forum / Birds / Birds / October 2007Alex and Writing in here
Its so rare that I comment in here and every time I do, I get your sh.t, people. Not enough of a bird enthusiast or too much of one. Colnel Sanders Chickens is another subject. When are you people going to stop being such a.sholes and just let normal people make their comments. What about the one hundred and fifty messages you suckers have been studying, which I haven't. You want something new? Then say something new. Go ahead. spend your time lacing into my comments. You people can just kiss my a.s. >Its so rare that I comment in here and every time I do, I get your >sh.t, people. Not enough of a bird enthusiast or too much of one. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >something new. Go ahead. spend your time lacing into my comments. >You people can just kiss my a.s. Go troll elsewhere. On Oct 30, 8:05 am, xpene...@earthlink.net wrote: > On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:03:00 -0700, "ladycactu...@gmail.com" > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Go troll elsewhere. You, my dear, are the troll. What the hell are you made of? Cardboard? What do you do for a living? Feed the pigeons? How noble. Now see if you can come up with a real dimwitted answer, you half-brain. On Oct 30, 9:57 am, "ladycactu...@gmail.com" <ladycactu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 30, 8:05 am, xpene...@earthlink.net wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > noble. Now see if you can come up with a real dimwitted answer, you > half-brain. Go troll elsewhere! > On Oct 30, 8:05 am, xpene...@earthlink.net wrote: >> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:03:00 -0700, "ladycactu...@gmail.com" [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > You, my dear, are the troll. Bzzzzzzt. Sorry, you don't know the definition of a 'troll'. Feel free to play again. > What the hell are you made of? Various amino acids, salts, and water? Or maybe sugar and spice and everything nice. Bwahahahahahahaha. > Cardboard? Recycle. I love word associations. > What do you do for a living? Why? Are you looking for work? > Feed the pigeons? Why? Are you hungry and hoping for a handout? Why would you want to take away the pigeon's hard-earned food? > How noble. How bitchy. > Now see if you can come up with a real dimwitted answer, you > half-brain. We thank you for your example of a dim-witted comeback. Keep on trucking. ROTFLOL!!!  SignatureDave > ladycactu...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Oct 30, 8:05 am, xpene...@earthlink.net wrote: [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > > - Show quoted text - > Bzzzzzzt. Sorry, you don't know the definition of a 'troll'. Feel free to > play again. Is that what talking about birds is to you? Just a game? Sorry I didn't know it either because then I wouldn't have had to get to know you and your angry clique. > Various amino acids, salts, and water? Or maybe sugar and spice and > everything nice. Bwahahahahahahaha. Everything nice? Sure. > Why? Are you hungry and hoping for a handout? Why would you want to take > away the pigeon's hard-earned food? Pigeons don't starve in New York, moron. And neither do the people. I would know...but you, well, that's a different story. > How bitchy. No, you've outdone the word, Dave. > We thank you for your example of a dim-witted comeback. Keep on trucking. > ROTFLOL!!! What dim-witted comeback? Noone has a chance to speak with you and your angry entourage around all the time. - Jamie >> ladycactu...@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Oct 30, 8:05 am, xpene...@earthlink.net wrote: [quoted text clipped - 52 lines] >> Bzzzzzzt. Sorry, you don't know the definition of a 'troll'. Feel >> free to play again. > Is that what talking about birds is to you? Just a game? Sorry I > didn't know it either because then I wouldn't have had to get to know > you and your angry clique. Bzzzzzt. Sorry, wrong again. Birds are not trolls, so your connection of the two species is incorrect. Please feel free to try again. >> Various amino acids, salts, and water? Or maybe sugar and spice and >> everything nice. Bwahahahahahahaha. > Everything nice? Sure. Yup, I'm sure. >> Why? Are you hungry and hoping for a handout? Why would you want to >> take away the pigeon's hard-earned food? > Pigeons don't starve in New York, moron. So that justifies your attempt to steal food from them? How sad. Have you no morals. ROTFLOL!!!! > And neither do the people. And what people would those be? The trolls that you have confused with birds? > I would know...but you, well, that's a different story. You don't even know the difference between a troll and a bird, so I doubt you know much of anything else. >> How bitchy. > No, you've outdone the word, Dave. "No, you've outdone the word, Dave". Now what the heck does THAT mean. The ONLY thing 'outdone' is how well you portray the consumate bitch. >> We thank you for your example of a dim-witted comeback. Keep on >> trucking. ROTFLOL!!! > What dim-witted comeback? LOL!!! I hope you're not serious. If so, you really need to read what's posted for context BEFORE you respond. > Noone has a chance to speak with you and > your angry entourage around all the time. Well, given that this is a text-based medium you are technically correct. No one has a chance to speak, because you have to write your thoughts; In Usenet no one can hear you scream. Bwahahahahahahahahaha. SignatureDave > Its so rare that I comment in here and every time I do, I get your > sh.t, people. Well, sh.t rolls downhill, wot. > Not enough of a bird enthusiast or too much of one. For what? A complete sentence is an invaluable source towards understanding. > Colnel Sanders Chickens is another subject. Not when there are absurd claims of birdy torture it isn't. > When are you people going > to stop being such a.sholes and just let normal people make their > comments. Uh, this is usenet, dearie. You don't get the ability to decide if a comment you make is left to itself, or savaged to shreds. > What about the one hundred and fifty messages you suckers > have been studying, which I haven't. What about them? Perhaps by reading those messages, you'd have found that your post was already covered ad nauseum. > You want something new? Then say > something new. You first, dearie. > Go ahead. spend your time lacing into my comments. > You people can just kiss my a.s. But you don't wash your a.s, or even deign to wipe it. With all that dried and crusted shell of sh.t stuck to your a.s, who'd ever want to kiss that filthy, encrusted and oozing pustule-ridden rear end of yours? Ewwwwwwwww!!!! SignatureDave > ladycactu...@gmail.com wrote: > > Its so rare that I comment in here and every time I do, I get your [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > -- > Dave > Well, sh.t rolls downhill, wot. Well, you do too, Bugg > For what? A complete sentence is an invaluable source towards understanding. It would be nice if you knew how to write one that isn't offensive, tight a.s. > Not when there are absurd claims of birdy torture it isn't. So what is the problem with mentioning a closing statement about this one? Do you know how to have friends? > Uh, this is usenet, dearie. You don't get the ability to decide if a comment > you make is left to itself, or savaged to shreds. So that's how you spend your time, it is apparent. > You first, dearie. No, really...after you, Prince Bugg. > But you don't wash your a.s, or even deign to wipe it. With all that dried > and crusted shell of sh.t stuck to your a.s, who'd ever want to kiss that > filthy, encrusted and oozing pustule-ridden rear end of yours? > Ewwwwwwwww!!!! Bugs like to fantasize about such things, don't they? Are you an adult? Truly? Then what on earth do you do for a living? My rear end is just fine, thank you for thinking on it. - Jamie >> ladycactu...@gmail.com wrote: >>> Its so rare that I comment in here and every time I do, I get your [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > >> Well, sh.t rolls downhill, wot. > Well, you do too, Bugg I roll downhill? Only on my trail bike, dearie. >> For what? A complete sentence is an invaluable source towards >> understanding. > It would be nice if you knew how to write one that isn't offensive, > tight a.s. What is it with you and the constant need to bring up sh.t and a.ses? Some sorta fetish, mayhaps. As far as offense, since you are the one I want to offend and make fun of, I'm glad it's working. >> Not when there are absurd claims of birdy torture it isn't. > So what is the problem with mentioning a closing statement about this > one? Huh??? Perhaps you could write a complete thought in English so that your meaning is understood. > Do you know how to have friends? Lots and lots. No need for me to ask you the same question, we already know the answer. Bwahahahahaha. >> Uh, this is usenet, dearie. You don't get the ability to decide if a >> comment you make is left to itself, or savaged to shreds. > So that's how you spend your time, it is apparent. Yes, I spend some time on usenet. Obviously, you don't. ROTFLOL!!!! >> You first, dearie. > No, really...after you, Prince Bugg. I can't, you're blocking the door. >> But you don't wash your a.s, or even deign to wipe it. With all that >> dried and crusted shell of sh.t stuck to your a.s, who'd ever want >> to kiss that filthy, encrusted and oozing pustule-ridden rear end of >> yours? Ewwwwwwwww!!!! > Bugs like to fantasize about such things, don't they? I'm not the one constantly referring to a.ses and sh.t. > Are you an > adult? Truly? You keep asking questions about people being adults and what they do for a living. Are you trying to find someone to date. Bwahahaha. > Then what on earth do you do for a living? See. There's that question again. Try contacting Match.com; perhaps they can help. > My rear end > is just fine, Are you sure? You seem awfully preoccupied with such things. > thank you for thinking on it. I think on my feet, not on your 'rear end'. Again with the a.s fantasies. Sheesh. SignatureDave Dave, You are the one who brought up all the a.s and sh.t imagery. You are obviously losing your place in the line because you can't even keep track of what you are saying and what you are referring to. I'm certain that if all you do is bike around and blow off nice people in a bird usenet group, your friends are not exactly the most de classe and you can be sure that you are not just offending me, but the people who read this site for information and the need to express themselves in a positive manner. You are the one blocking the door for people who want to write in here because you monopolize it with your in depth hateful remarks and your need to be disgusting. As for the chickens - have you anything new to say about it? Not really, right? Because you don't think at all. You just get trigger happy and do nothing else. As for my social life...you know nothing of it and the people I know would be bleary eyed by your reproachful and uninsightful as well as generally lost arguments. Roll down a hill, Dave and don't come back my way again. You are too low on the scale of things to keep company with people like me. > Dave, Let me paraphrase what you for said for the sake of brevity: Waaaaaaaah.... booo-hooo-hoooo. Whaa, whaa, whaaa. I've been on this NG for the since 2001. I'm not going anywhere. Feel free to go elsewhere if you don't want to my company. SignatureDave > I've been on this NG for the since 2001. Oops. English translation: I've been on this NG since 2001. SignatureDave > Dave, > > You are the one who brought up all the a.s and sh.t imagery. Read your first post in this thread. You start by stating "Its so rare that I comment in here and every time I do, I get your sh.t, people." Then you end that post by saying: "You people can just kiss my a.s." It ain't me who's "obviously losing your place in the line because you can't even keep track of what you are saying and what you are referring to." Oh foolish, foolish twit. SignatureDave > ladycactu...@gmail.com wrote: > > Dave, [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > -- > Dave Do you even own birds, Dave? If I am such a twit, then one can only imagine how much less you are. Who cares that you spend your time misconstruing the comments of nicer people. I know you love to be as insulting as possible but we have yet to see your glorious post about the chickens, which is, I agree with you, a serious subject. And by the way, fools usually think the more intelligent people of the world are the fools. I wrote my comment to bring attention to the fact that you are hostile and rude. I did not write it so that an idiot like you who has no sense of professionalism about anything could try to make a mockery and a scene in front of millions of bird lovers. Writing here for that long makes you the president of the ornithology society of the world? I wasn't aware there was such a society. Maybe in your myopic little world you really are all that, but in this one - your respect is diminishing as we speak. You have no right to say things like >> But you don't wash your a.s, or even deign to wipe it. With all that >> dried and crusted shell of sh.t stuck to your a.s, who'd ever want >> to kiss that filthy, encrusted and oozing pustule-ridden rear end of >> yours? Ewwwwwwwww!!!! in a usenet group. I wrote what I wrote to expose you for what you are and I seem to have been quite successful. Now we'll see if your following comments to other people's remarks are really so helpful. >> ladycactu...@gmail.com wrote: >>> Dave, [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Do you even own birds, Dave? Yes, Sseveral parrots. If you had read the thread on Alex you would have seen that. > If I am such a twit, then one can only > imagine how much less you are. You're absolutely right; I am much less of a twit than you are. > Who cares that you spend your time > misconstruing the comments of nicer people. You're not nice one bit. You are a thin-skinned skank who stumbled into this NG without reading any posts to determine what is going on. And your comments aren't misconstrued. It's not my fault your writing is incoherent. > I know you love to be as > insulting as possible You really know nothing about me, as per your question about whether I owned birds. You have no idea how many folks I've assisted over the years. You, on the other hand, have no history here at all. > but we have yet to see your glorious post about > the chickens, I didn't post about chickens, twit. I responded to a post about chickens. Sorry you fail to understand the difference. > which is, I agree with you, a serious subject. You agree that the most serious subject about chickens is if there is a chicken shortage? That's the only serious subject about chickens I'm concerned with. > And by > the way, fools usually think the more intelligent people of the world > are the fools. And yet despite that 'insight' you proceed to act the way you do. > I wrote my comment to bring attention to the fact that > you are hostile and rude. Oh, that hurt; it cut me to ribbons and made me cry. <snork> > I did not write it so that an idiot like > you who has no sense of professionalism about anything Really? Based on your profound personal knowledge of me. Bwahahahahahahaha. > could try to > make a mockery and a scene in front of millions of bird lovers. But you deserve to be mocked. Now, smile and wave for the 'millions' of bird lovers on this ng. > Writing here for that long makes you the president of the ornithology > society of the world? More like Supreme Ruler. Now bow before me, rabble. > I wasn't aware there was such a society. ROTFLOL!!!!!! You're serious? Who said there was such a society besides your self? > Maybe > in your myopic little world you really are all that, but in this one - > your respect is diminishing as we speak. Really? Is that objective measurement? > You have no right to say > things like [Let me help you configure this correctly] " But you don't wash your a.s, or even deign to wipe it. With all that dried and crusted shell of sh.t stuck to your a.s, who'd ever want to kiss that filthy, encrusted and oozing pustule-ridden rear end of yours? Ewwwwwwwww!!!!" > in a usenet group. You are one huge sack-O-stupid, aren't ya? Of course I have every right to say that, and any other thing I want. You clearly don't understand the concept of usenet. > I wrote what I wrote to expose you for what you > are and I seem to have been quite successful. BWAHAHAHAHA!!! You really showed me. >Now we'll see if your > following comments to other people's remarks are really so helpful. Whooosh!!!! Now please, keep frothing at the mouth and write something else. You are a giggle. And I thought M.J was fun; but you, dearie, are a blast-o-fun. SignatureDave > ladycactu...@gmail.com wrote: > >> ladycactu...@gmail.com wrote: [quoted text clipped - 124 lines] > > - Show quoted text - I rest my case. You've illustrated perfectly that you are a cruel SOB with no interest in birds, but rather in shredding people's posts. Have anything nice to say about the latest one on Alex? As for the chickens...I guess your parrots dine on those. You don't know what joy is...you are a fool, not an intellect. I'm not intimidated by you, Dave. I've dealt with people like you in these groups many times and no matter how much or how little you know about the subject, your main interest is always in shredding, not helping. You don't know what a blast of fun is because you are too angry. I have nothing more to say to you. Your birds are probably as mean as you are. Good for you. I'm waiting for you to shred the last post about Alex like you did mine, oops - but maybe I tipped you off too soon. - Jamie P.S. I thought the comment about the chickens was about chicken abuse, but I guess you turned it into one about a shortage for people's appetites. Did you not say something to the effect that there are other kinds of bird abuse out there? Oh, I really must have missed your point. You're easy to push buttons with. You can't even follow a statement without making a clown of yourself. Alrighty now, let's scrape the mouth foam away and looky see what you've written now. > I rest my case. The only case you have is that case of herpes you picked up whilst working the brothels in Tijuana > You've illustrated perfectly that you are a cruel SOB And you would know all about bitches, right bitch? And that would make your son an SOB, wouldn't it? > with no interest in birds, As opposed to all of your posts to date which have fully centered around birds. My interest in birds has been fully vetted in this NG for years. As for you, all you've done is bitch and moan and whine. > but rather in shredding people's posts. Your ignorance is absolutely funny. > Have anything nice to say about the latest one on Alex? Why don't you set down that sack-O-stupid for a bit and read the most recent thread about Alex. Until you do, you haven't the slightest clue about that which you're talking. > As for the chickens...I guess your parrots dine on those. Isn't your acknowledgement of my parrots in contradiction to your assertions that I have no interest in birds. You really are a lost child.As a matter of fact, they do. And here's my favorite set of chicken photos. I call it "The Wonderful Spatchcocked Chicken" http://www.nakedwhiz.com/spatch.htm > You don't know what > joy is... I'm have a joygasm right now. > you are a fool, not an intellect. Do you typically spend so much time and attention on fools? ROTFLOL!!!! > I'm not intimidated by > you, Dave. Yawn. OK, you're not intimidated. <Snork> Only the truly intimidated tend to thump their chests whilst proclaiming that they're not intimidated. > I've dealt with people like you in these groups many times > and no matter how much or how little you know about the subject, your > main interest is always in shredding, not helping. Given the fact that you're a newbie here, you've failed to review even the most recent threads prior to posting on a subject that had just been addressed, you have no idea of just what the posting history is of any of the folks on this ng, you haven't a clue as to anyone, much less me. You are an awsome example of a thin-skinned hyper-ego who feels the world must pay an homage to her mere presence. You fail to even extend the most basic courtesy of introducing yourself or even just lurking for awhile to get the feel of what is going on. You've impressed upon this ng just exactly what a miserable person you are, and will continue to be. > You don't know > what a blast of fun is because you are too angry. Responding to you is fun, and I'm not angry a bit. Do you get angry at a piece of Kleenex just because you need to use it? I don't. You are the kleenex of the ng right now. > I have nothing more > to say to you. I thought you already said something like that. I guess I was wrong. You'll post again; you won't be able to help yourself. > Your birds are probably as mean as you are. Good for > you. We can see that you are just ooooozing with charm and calm. Good thing you're not angry Bwahahahahahahaa. > I'm waiting for you to shred the last post about Alex like you > did mine, oops - but maybe I tipped you off too soon. As was said previously at least twice now, if you really had an interest in Alex posts, you'd read the thread that was already running. By choosing not to do so, you continue to demonstrate your abyssmal ignorance. > - Jamie > P.S. I thought the comment about the chickens was about chicken > abuse, but I guess you turned it into one about a shortage for > people's appetites. That's what happens when your ability to read for context is compromised. > Did you not say something to the effect that > there are other kinds of bird abuse out there? Nope, but we already understand why you fail to comprehend what a post actually says. > Oh, I really must have > missed your point. You're easy to push buttons with. Oh, so this was just a setup? Gee, you just pulled the wool over everyone's eyes. Nice try at the backstroke there, dearie. > You can't even > follow a statement without making a clown of yourself. I give you a 2.5 for trying to make a witty comment. However, I'm not a clown. I'm the guy with the Klown Hammer. Consider yerself whacked. SignatureDave www.davebbq.com > Its so rare that I comment in here and every time I do, I get your > sh.t, people. Not enough of a bird enthusiast or too much of one. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > something new. Go ahead. spend your time lacing into my comments. > You people can just kiss my a.s. Huh? WTF? |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.