Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Mammals
FerretsGuinea PigsHamstersRabbitsRats
Aquaria
GeneralMarine ReefFreshwaterPlantsCichlidsGoldfish
Birds
BirdsParrots
Miscellaneous
Animal HealthPet Loss
PetKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Pet Forum / Birds / Birds / March 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Legal qustion about keeping a parrot

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Urisom - 06 Mar 2004 01:25 GMT
We brought a Nanday Conure small parrot (weight 150 grams) some 6 months ago,
legally into Canada. The bird flew through the window into our apartment while
staying in Miami. Today, we are very much, attached to this lovely intelligent
bird, and it adopted us perfectly.
We live in a condominium building in Toronto for the last 13 years and never
had any quarrel with neighbours, on the contrary we have here lots of good
friends.
A few days ago I received from the management a printed matter i.e.
"Condominium Bylaws & Rule" in which the following sentence appears: "No animal
shall be allowed or kept in or about any unit or common element."

Could anyone in this esteemed group enlighten me if I can get successfully
around this law with or without judicial help?

Thanks you very much for any help!

Kurt
Rick - 06 Mar 2004 01:43 GMT
> We brought a Nanday Conure small parrot (weight 150 grams) some 6 months ago,
> legally into Canada. The bird flew through the window into our apartment while
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Could anyone in this esteemed group enlighten me if I can get successfully
> around this law with or without judicial help?

Did the management give you this list of bylaws and rules
because of your bird, or was just a routine distribution?
In other words, do they know you're keeping a pet?

If the management doesn't know about your bird, the best
thing to do is nothing.  If they do know about it and are
asking you to remove it, then do so.  Find a friend or
relative to take care of it for a few days (or maybe just
one day, if the management wants to schedule a specific
day to come in and verify it's been removed).  Then bring
it back home the following day.

At least from my experience, most managers won't hassle
residents about pets, even if pets aren't allowed in a complex,
unless they're receiving complaints.  Conures can be loud,
and it's possible one of your neighbors is complaining to
management without your knowlege.

Rick
Urisom - 06 Mar 2004 02:02 GMT
Dear Rick,

Thank you so much indeed, I can feel a heavy stone starts rolling off my chest!
I will follow exactly what you suggest. With the very hope that it will work,
it might sound silly, but the bond between our conure and us is rather
unbelievably strong. I would have never believed that before we before we
brought the bird home.

All the best to you, Kurt
Laurie - 06 Mar 2004 03:15 GMT
> > We brought a Nanday Conure small parrot (weight 150 grams) some 6 months ago,
> > legally into Canada. The bird flew through the window into our apartment while
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> Rick

Actually, landlords can and do evict tenants that have pets when it is not
allowed.  It happened to me with my cat.  Turned out the cat was much better
company than my room mates were, so it worked out for me.

Laurie
Rick - 06 Mar 2004 06:43 GMT
> > At least from my experience, most managers won't hassle
> > residents about pets, even if pets aren't allowed in a complex,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> allowed.  It happened to me with my cat.  Turned out the cat was much better
> company than my room mates were, so it worked out for me.

:-)  If anything good has come from the horrible economy
here in my part of CA, it's that some property managers
and owners are easing up on these stupid no-pet policies.
In the place we're in now, they said it was ok to keep
birds, even though it's still written in the lease that no pets
are allowed.  They even took an extra $200 deposit for
our birds before we moved in.

Rick
Laurie - 06 Mar 2004 16:37 GMT
> > > At least from my experience, most managers won't hassle
> > > residents about pets, even if pets aren't allowed in a complex,
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Rick

Yeah, they're trying to attract those potential home buyers to start renting
again.  That's a good thing for us bird nuts, eh?

L
jmcquown - 06 Mar 2004 17:19 GMT
>>>> At least from my experience, most managers won't hassle
>>>> residents about pets, even if pets aren't allowed in a complex,
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> L

Aye... I rent and have for years.  I paid a $150 pet fee when I moved in 7
years ago and $10 a month.  This includes my cat and whether or not I have
multiple birds.  That would be, as long as I'm not turning a room into an
aviary, I suppose, although they haven't checked LOL

Plus, the management takes care of everything including trash pickup,
replacing broken appliances, the carpet when the water heater leaked last
year and when the dishwasher crapped out they replaced the disposal, too.  I
have a full sized washer and dryer in a nice 1100 sq. ft. apartment with a
huge fenced patio... but, unfortunately, no flocks of wild parrots at my
feeders.  (sigh)

Jill
Laurie - 06 Mar 2004 17:43 GMT
> Aye... I rent and have for years.  I paid a $150 pet fee when I moved in 7
> years ago and $10 a month.  This includes my cat and whether or not I have
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Jill

Well, you can always move to FL and move in with Marco, Chuck and I.  Yikes!
3 cats, a dog, and all those birds?!?!?!  What a gas!
sweetmolly - 07 Mar 2004 18:38 GMT
> > Aye... I rent and have for years.  I paid a $150 pet fee when I moved in 7
> > years ago and $10 a month.  This includes my cat and whether or not I have
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Well, you can always move to FL and move in with Marco, Chuck and I.  Yikes!
> 3 cats, a dog, and all those birds?!?!?!  What a gas!

I just hope there will be enough room for when *I* move over with my
menagerie :0)
Dora Smith - 07 Mar 2004 08:27 GMT
Folks, I don't live in California - but I've always been advised that small
caged animals and birds are not "pets".  Only dogs and cats are - and often
not cats.

A bird isn't even an animal.  Animals are mammalian.

I wouldn't hurt to consult a tenants' rights group or service in your city.

--

Yours,
Dora Smith
Austin, Texas
villandra@austin.rr.com

> > "Laurie" <whowhat@where.com> wrote in message
> news:Ymb2c.21092$yZ1.19555@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> L
Rick - 07 Mar 2004 08:31 GMT
> Folks, I don't live in California - but I've always been advised that small
> caged animals and birds are not "pets".  Only dogs and cats are - and often
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I wouldn't hurt to consult a tenants' rights group or service in your city.

Mammals are one of the six main classes of animals.

Rick

> Yours,
> Dora Smith
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> >
> > L
Marc0 - 07 Mar 2004 11:06 GMT
> A bird isn't even an animal.  Animals are mammalian.

Biology 101???
a parrot, a fish, a snake, a lobster, a bee, a monkey.... they're all
animals.

Signature

=-Marco-=
Parrots are Loud
Parrots are Messy
Parrots are Expensive
Parrots are Needy
Parrots are Wild Animals
*************
Parrots are NOT toys
Parrots are NOT decorations
Parrots are NOT easy to keep
Parrots can be a pain in the a.s!

peneny@earthlink.net - 07 Mar 2004 12:29 GMT
>Folks, I don't live in California - but I've always been advised that small
>caged animals and birds are not "pets".  Only dogs and cats are - and often
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>I wouldn't hurt to consult a tenants' rights group or service in your city.

It's a condo, not an apartment. He's not a tenant, but a co-owner.
X-No-Archive: yes
Starlight - 06 Mar 2004 06:17 GMT
>A few days ago I received from the management a printed matter i.e.
>"Condominium Bylaws & Rule" in which the following sentence appears: "No animal
>shall be allowed or kept in or about any unit or common element."

Is that a new law that wasn't in place when you bought your condo?  
I wouldn't lie about the fact that you have the bird if that bylaw was
in the contract/lease you originally signed.
If it's a new law, you may have some sort of legal recourse, but I'm
not a lawyer so can't help you with that.
Becky
jmcquown - 06 Mar 2004 09:40 GMT
>> A few days ago I received from the management a printed matter i.e.
>> "Condominium Bylaws & Rule" in which the following sentence appears:
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> not a lawyer so can't help you with that.
> Becky

I have a real problem with owning my dwelling and having someone else,
bylaws or not, telling me I can or cannot have a pet.  That's like saying I
can't paint my house purple if I so choose.  Hell, I bought the place.

It's one thing if you are keeping flocks of birds which might be disturbing
the neighbors.  Or having cats which are allowed to wander all over, or dogs
doing their 'business' in the neighbors yards.

It's quite another if you own the place, keep the peace, don't let your
parrot disturb people and then they start harrassing you with what would
seem to be 'new' bylaws.

I'd do what was suggested by Rick:  "If the management doesn't know about
your bird, the best thing to do is nothing."  Might be just the requisite
annual flier in the mailbox.  IIRC, if there is a real complaint about your
conure, they are required to specifically send you a letter telling you so,
not put a generalized "note" in your mailbox.

If you are really so concerned, contact an attorney.  Most will consult with
you over the phone for nothing, at least here in the U.S.  Canada mileage
may vary :)  Good luck!

Jill
Rick - 06 Mar 2004 10:21 GMT
> >> A few days ago I received from the management a printed matter i.e.
> >> "Condominium Bylaws & Rule" in which the following sentence appears:
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> bylaws or not, telling me I can or cannot have a pet.  That's like saying I
> can't paint my house purple if I so choose.  Hell, I bought the place.

This isn't the case with condos.  Condo associations can
place restrictions on what one can do with their own
property, including whether one can keep pets in it, or
paint it purple.  Or paint it at all.

It really is a silly concept.  If I wanted to deal with this
kind of nonsense I'd just assume rent an apartment.

Rick
jmcquown - 06 Mar 2004 10:25 GMT
>>>> A few days ago I received from the management a printed matter i.e.
>>>> "Condominium Bylaws & Rule" in which the following sentence
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Rick

BUT, the bylaws should state that on the front end and not be presented as a
"oh, here you go" flier in the mailbox.

My parents live on an island which has an association... the rules to build
were, keep it natural wood, shades of brown, green... no purple houses...
until the really rich folks started moving in and building pink stucco
mansions.  Then suddenly the rules went out the window.  Funny how that
happens.

Jill
Dora Smith - 07 Mar 2004 08:31 GMT
Yup, there are housing entities that are rather medieval.  Condominiums are
one.  M.U.D.'s are another.   M.U.D.'s are some kind of substandard Texas
municipality that exists for the sake of providing no services, but rather
telling residents how to live.

I don't know if it's really confined to Texas, but here land isn't
necessarily organized into townships so if no village or city then the
county government is all there is - and in Texas county governments really
aren't worth much.

On consulting an attorney, in many American cities the local bar
associations have programs where you can consult with an attorney for $20
for a half hour or something.  But I'd seriously check with tenants' rights
groups - they're more likely to have the knowledge.

--

Yours,
Dora Smith
Austin, Texas
villandra@austin.rr.com

> > >> A few days ago I received from the management a printed matter i.e.
> > >> "Condominium Bylaws & Rule" in which the following sentence appears:
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Rick
peneny@earthlink.net - 07 Mar 2004 12:32 GMT
>Yup, there are housing entities that are rather medieval.  Condominiums are
>one.  M.U.D.'s are another.   M.U.D.'s are some kind of substandard Texas
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>for a half hour or something.  But I'd seriously check with tenants' rights
>groups - they're more likely to have the knowledge.

He's not a tenant, but a co-owner!
X-No-Archive: yes
Starlight - 07 Mar 2004 16:15 GMT
>On consulting an attorney, in many American cities the local bar
>associations have programs where you can consult with an attorney for $20
>for a half hour or something.  But I'd seriously check with tenants' rights
>groups - they're more likely to have the knowledge.

If there was a "no pets" clause when he bought the condo, and he
signed the contract containing the "no pets" clause, then why would he
think he can have a pet?   Others in the building signed that contract
with the assurance that there would be no pets in the building.  

If, however, it's a new ordinance, he may have a case.

As for the comment that a cat isn't even considered a pet.....????
peneny@earthlink.net - 07 Mar 2004 18:43 GMT
>>On consulting an attorney, in many American cities the local bar
>>associations have programs where you can consult with an attorney for $20
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>think he can have a pet?   Others in the building signed that contract
>with the assurance that there would be no pets in the building.  

It's not a clause. It's a by-law. When a person makes an offer to
purchase a condo they are given a copy of the by-laws. Mine was
literally an inch thick.

>If, however, it's a new ordinance, he may have a case.

The Board of Directors doesn't just arbitrarily pass new by-laws.
Something like this would be put up to a vote of all the co-owners.
If you had an "animal" they would be grandfathered in. There is no he
"might have a case."

>As for the comment that a cat isn't even considered a pet.....????

X-No-Archive: yes
Starlight - 07 Mar 2004 19:30 GMT
>The Board of Directors doesn't just arbitrarily pass new by-laws.
>Something like this would be put up to a vote of all the co-owners.
>If you had an "animal" they would be grandfathered in. There is no he
>"might have a case."

I didn't see the OP mention anything about the pet being grandfathered
in.   It sounded as though it was a notice about not having pets,
period.   Would be nice to know if that "by-law" was in the original
contract, and if so, why send out notices at this point?  
I've never lived in a condo so don't completely understand how they do
things.  
Becky
Urisom - 06 Mar 2004 23:33 GMT
Hi Jill,

Thanks for your interest and advice. Rick's suggestions are super, as long as
nobody complains. In addition, those who complain are individuals that do not
hear the bird. Some good and serious low obeying neighbours.... :=)
I think I will hire a lawyer, a bird loving of course!

Kurt
Louis Boyd - 06 Mar 2004 15:30 GMT
> We brought a Nanday Conure small parrot (weight 150 grams) some 6 months ago,
> legally into Canada. The bird flew through the window into our apartment while
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Thanks you very much for any help!

Parrots are not "neighbor friendly".  You're cute little ball of
feathers can be extremly obnoxios to a neighor who's trying to sleep.
One good solution is to buy your own home on at least 5 acres of
property, preferably with trees and hedges to block the noise.  My
nearest neighbor is 100 yards from me with the side of a small mountain
between us, yet she can easily hear my macaws in the morning.   I can
easily  hear the dogs of another neighbor 400 yards away at night  We
live with it and no one complains, at least not to the authorities.

As far a legality, if you've already violated the terms of your
agreement your landlord may already  have grounds for eviction.
Pressing the issue legally is probably unwise.  Your best bet is to get
on friendly enough terms with your neighbors that they won't report you
even if they are annoyed by the bird.  That may not be possible.
--
Lou Boyd
jmcquown - 06 Mar 2004 16:25 GMT
>> We brought a Nanday Conure small parrot (weight 150 grams) some 6
>> months ago, legally into Canada. (snip)
>> A few days ago I received from the management a printed matter i.e.
>> "Condominium Bylaws & Rule" in which the following sentence appears:
>> "No animal shall be allowed or kept in or about any unit or common
>> element."

Parrots are not "neighbor friendly".  You're cute little ball of
> feathers can be extremly obnoxios to a neighor who's trying to sleep.
> One good solution is to buy your own home on at least 5 acres of
> property, preferably with trees and hedges to block the noise. (snip)

Oh, allow me to say, bullshit.  I live in an apartment and I *never* hear my
neighbors dog, nor her television, nor her phone, nor her having sex.  She
likewise never hears my chirping lovebird, nor my meowing cat, nor me having
sex.  Not that we, as neighbors sharing a wall, don't do all of those
things! ROFL

The only issue at hand is whether or not the condo association is trying to
institute new rules, just hand out reminders or whatever.  IMO, if they have
specific complaints about her bird they need to approach her with a specific
complaint, not a mailbox flier.  And there is no need to move to a 5 acre
plot of land to have one bird... that's simply a ridiculous request.

Jill
The Asuncion's - 06 Mar 2004 17:31 GMT
Hearing the bird may depend on where it's kept also.  We live two streets
over from a house that has birds.  Not sure what type exactly, but I know
that some are outside and they aren't all small birds.  I primarily hear one
and I hear it in my house doors closed and all, mostly at night too.  It
kind of sounds like a screaching monkey, if that makes sense.  Anyhow, I
could see if that type of noise was being made in an apartment it would make
some pretty cranky.
> >> We brought a Nanday Conure small parrot (weight 150 grams) some 6
> >> months ago, legally into Canada. (snip)
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Jill
jmcquown - 06 Mar 2004 17:40 GMT
> Hearing the bird may depend on where it's kept also.  We live two
> streets over from a house that has birds.  Not sure what type
> exactly, but I know that some are outside

*Outside* being the operative word.  The OP is referring to a conure which
is a relatively small parrot, kept indoors.

and they aren't all small
> birds.  I primarily hear one and I hear it in my house doors closed
> and all, mostly at night too.  It kind of sounds like a screaching
> monkey, if that makes sense.  Anyhow, I could see if that type of
> noise was being made in an apartment it would make some pretty cranky.

But you know what?  I live in an apartment but have neighbors down the
street in houses who raise chickens.  I hear the roosters crowing early in
the morning.  I think it's rather charming.  Doesn't disturb me in the
least.  In fact, when we had a terrible storm last July and I lost power for
a week, those roosters were what told me to get up and get ready for work at
5:00 a.m. :)  Of course, we had no power at work either, but the phone
systems were knocked out for miles around too so I had to get up and drive
to the office just to find out if we were 'open'.  Thank god for the
roosters.

Jill
>>>> We brought a Nanday Conure small parrot (weight 150 grams) some 6
>>>> months ago, legally into Canada. (snip)
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>>
>> Jill
High Flight - 07 Mar 2004 00:49 GMT
Urisom <urisom@aol.com> says...
> We brought a Nanday Conure small parrot (weight 150 grams) some 6 months ago,
> legally into Canada. The bird flew through the window into our apartment while
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Could anyone in this esteemed group enlighten me if I can get successfully
> around this law with or without judicial help?

Condo bylaws and rules aren't arbitrary.  They exist to promote a good
quality of life for all residents.  Why do you feel you're entitled to an
exemption?

                Jack

Signature

                     *Top-posters are generally ignored*
aka Keet        Visit my webpage at http://junior.apk.net/~jac/   
                 "Always proofread to see if you any words."

Dora Smith - 07 Mar 2004 08:36 GMT
At risk of being kicked off newsnet -

Why do you think YOU'RE entitled to have a bird?

Honestly, I don't believe somebody had the nerve to say something like this!

Perhaps you and our inquirer could switch residences.  It sounds like you're
cut out for hers.
--

Yours,
Dora Smith
Austin, Texas
villandra@austin.rr.com

> Condo bylaws and rules aren't arbitrary.  They exist to promote a good
> quality of life for all residents.  Why do you feel you're entitled to an
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> --
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.