>> I said it was wrong.
> which was why I asked "source?".
>
> /Tommi
> One of my pet peeves is people quoting websites as their main source of
> information. As much as I enjoy reading the Cichlid-Forum and respect Marc
> and Eric, just because it's written in an article on their site doesn't make
> it right. With that said.
Very much agreed - which is why I'm inquiring about the sources of this
observation, while this newly fangled `intarweb' is a great resource for
aquarists, it's also the source of much controversy and many disputing
`facts'. that, and nothing more is the reason I'm asking - because
unless you have ready access to a local ph.d in african riftlakes,
you're going to have to eihter go there yourself to measure hardness,
ph, etc - or rely on whatever informtion you're granted - disputing or
not, and then make your best acessment.
that somebody's posted it on usenet doesn't make it more true than an
article ;)
I realize that it might have come off blunt, but being concise is imho
more important.
having said all that, I think it's great that this thread's lured out
some people with knowledge (well sourced too) I thank you all for that :)
> Sources for hardness. One must remember that pH and hardness is not the same
> everywhere on the lake. Water will be lower in pH and softer where rivers
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> wouldn't say it was soft, but I would not agree with any of the articles
> that say "Very Hard" either.
Right - having `researched' - i.e. google->more articles with "dubious"
sources - it'd seem that Taganyika is quite hard, whereas malawi could
be considered `soft' in comparison, yet still relatively hard.
> In the mineral break down, Lake Malawi contains more Calcium and Magnesium
> Carbonates and some Silicates than Lake Tanganyika.
> Lake Tanganyika contains Sodium, Magnesium, Potassium and a small percentage
> of Calcium. These in the forms of Carbonates, Chloride, Sulfates and
> Silicates.
and thanks alot for this imho invaluable contribution to my knowledge :P
/Tommi
Sandy Birrell - 19 Feb 2005 18:16 GMT
>> One of my pet peeves is people quoting websites as their main source of
>> information. As much as I enjoy reading the Cichlid-Forum and respect
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> ph, etc - or rely on whatever informtion you're granted - disputing or
> not, and then make your best acessment.
If you want to get really technical have a look at these sites.
http://www.crle.uoguelph.ca/malawi/
http://www.gemswater.org/atlas-gwq/table7-e.html

Signature
Don`t Worry, Be Happy
Sandy
--
E-Mail:- news@ftscotland.co.uk
Website:- http://www.ftscotland.co.uk
Looking for a webhost? Try http://www.1and1.co.uk/?k_id=2966019
steve@tropheus.demon.co.uk - 19 Feb 2005 18:31 GMT
>Right - having `researched' - i.e. google->more articles with "dubious"
>sources - it'd seem that Taganyika is quite hard, whereas malawi could
>be considered `soft' in comparison, yet still relatively hard.
Yep, it's all relative. Malawi is hard relative to most African rivers
but soft relative to most of the other rift lakes. The hardness is
related to the age of lakes and how long the minerals have been
accumulating. For example Tanganika is much older than Malawi.
In the late 1960's Peter Davies sent his first big Malawi shipment to
London. It came with a bottle of water to be tested. All I got was a
pair of auratus, a pair of elongatus and a water analysis.
Some years later a shipment from Malawi arrived in Manchester. One of
the bags had no fish! We thought is was a short shipment but later
realised it was just a space filler. It was an opportunity for further
water analysis. I remember the pH was near neutral and water was quite
soft. I know the pH may have reduced during the two days it took to
get from Malawi to Manchester but I don't know of any reason for the
water to soften. Chemists?
We didn't want to repeat the mistakes that had cost the Tanganika
keepers in the early sixties. Tanganika was thought to be the same
water as the Congo.

Signature
Steve Wolstenholme Neural Planner Software
EasyNN-plus. The easy way to build neural networks.
http://www.easynn.com