My "Lamp." similis photo gallery
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Cichlidiot - 19 Apr 2004 15:03 GMT I've put up a page with my current photo gallery of my similis tanks and their fry. I got some good photos with my new digital camera in macro mode which motivated me to post the pictures. Later on, I'll make a more detailed breeding tank style page.
Here's the URL:
http://www.shwaine.com/fish_similis.html
Enjoy.
Siegfried Baesler - 19 Apr 2004 15:28 GMT > I've put up a page with my current photo gallery of my similis tanks and > their fry. I got some good photos with my new digital camera in macro mode [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Enjoy. Hi,
I think you can improve the quality of your photos, if you would use more creative means like framing of the fish (golden section).
Anyway good results for first photos.
Regards
Siggi
 Signature Homepage http://www.naturundfoto.net Fische http://www.aquanet.de/Privat/naturaquarium/
Cichlidiot - 19 Apr 2004 23:03 GMT In rec.aquaria.freshwater.cichlids Siegfried Baesler <naturundfoto@tiscali.de> wrote:
> I think you can improve the quality of your photos, > if you would use more creative means like framing of the fish (golden > section). Golden section is rather hard to do when framing multiple moving subjects. It's a nice theory, but much harder practice. I've taken photo classes in the past and found some use golden section as a crutch anyways. It's not a required thing for framing shots and sometimes looks quite unnatural with certain subjects. Besides, these are all crops of much larger photographs to make them small enough to put on a webpage. If I really wanted to, at the expense of file size, I could recrop to have the main focal object in a golden section, but I found that to be unneccessary.
Siegfried Bäsler - 19 Apr 2004 23:19 GMT >In rec.aquaria.freshwater.cichlids Siegfried Baesler <naturundfoto@tiscali.de> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >Golden section is rather hard to do when framing multiple moving subjects. >It's a nice theory, but much harder practice. That is true, it is a hard job.
>I've taken photo classes in >the past and found some use golden section as a crutch anyways. It's not a [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >the expense of file size, I could recrop to have the main focal object in >a golden section, but I found that to be unneccessary. I often see photos from fishes, they look all egual, because of bullseye focus. Those kind of photos are usful for books, but the more interesting photos are photos they tell a story and with a photo you can initiate that. But this is my personal opinion.
Greatings Siggi
 Signature Email naturundfoto@tiscali.de Homepage www.naturundfoto.net Fische www.aquanet.de/Privat/naturaquarium/ phone +49 30 755 18 770
Cichlidiot - 20 Apr 2004 00:02 GMT In rec.aquaria.freshwater.cichlids Siegfried B?sler <nospamthanks@tiscali.de> wrote:
> I often see photos from fishes, they look all egual, because of bullseye > focus. Those kind of photos are usful for books, but the more > interesting photos are photos they tell a story and with a photo you can > initiate that. > But this is my personal opinion. Well, if I could really be argumentative here, show me which photo of mine on that page, other than the whole tank shot and the one closeup of the similis on the blue-grey-green background, that has the fish in the exact center of focus. With the exception of the two listed, which would look rather wierd if shot differently IMO, all the others have the fish off-center in a fuzzy form of the rule of thirds which takes into account multiple subjects and the backgrounds.
Take the first photo of the similis in the 10gal. He is in the upper third of the shot, although a little close to center. The rock is in the left third. The shell is in the right third. The closeup of the fry in front of the leaves uses the leaves to create the thirds. The fry is somewhat off-center. The larger leaf takes up 2/3rds of the photo, the small leaves make up the other third and the fry is at the margins of the two.
As I said in the first post, I could have cropped these photos to an exact golden rule in several cases (others could not due to the issue of framing multiple subjects that I also mentioned), but it would have increased their file size to an extent I found unneccessary given the fact that the current croppings don't have any of the fish dead smack in the middle of the photo except for the closeup of the similis. That one is more of a portrait which would look rather odd, due to the lack of balancing background, if the fish were not somewhat centered, but even then, it is not exactly centered.
Graham Broadbridge - 20 Apr 2004 06:19 GMT > In rec.aquaria.freshwater.cichlids Siegfried B?sler <nospamthanks@tiscali.de> wrote: > > I often see photos from fishes, they look all egual, because of bullseye [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Well, if I could really be argumentative here, show me which photo of mine Yah Yah Yah. If you didn't want some critical comments why post at all? You want us all to go 'oh wow'
You remind me of that idiot on American Idol when told his performance sucked, threw a glass of water in the judges face. Grow up, get a life, and learn some humility.
Graham.
P.S. I thought the photos were okay, nothing to rave about.
Paul - 20 Apr 2004 06:38 GMT Graham Broadbridge wrote in message <4084b2eb$0$16965$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>...
>> In rec.aquaria.freshwater.cichlids Siegfried B?sler ><nospamthanks@tiscali.de> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > >P.S. I thought the photos were okay, nothing to rave about. ok, to all involved here: Do you think it might be a good idea if this was the last post in this thread? Why not just forget about arguing this thread and just move on. You're not going to convince each other that you are right or they are wrong etc. Really there is no point to continuing this thread is there? unless you really enjoy arguing of course.
So, who can stand up here and help keep our fantastic aquaria groups free of silly arguements like this?
paul.
p.s. I won't be reading any further posts in this thread, so please don't bother to reply to this post.
Amateur Cichlids - 20 Apr 2004 13:17 GMT > I've put up a page with my current photo gallery of my similis tanks and > their fry. I got some good photos with my new digital camera in macro mode [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Enjoy. I don't know much about photography, although I'm learning. :-) So, all the rules of thirds, golden framing, etc, doesn't particularly interest me. To me, the main jist is to be able to see the fish clearly so you can see if you like them. The graininess you spoke of could be alleviated if you had more light over the top of the tank when taking your photos. The aggression with the fry from the adults I believe you would see completely alleviated if you added a dozen more small shells to the tank. In my 20 long with my L. multifasciauts I have nine adults, a large bunch of fry swimming around and over three dozen shells that are large enough for an adult to swim into easily. I also have quite a few smaller shells that I brought back from the lake. If you look at the page I did for my multies, http://www.amateurcichlids.com/fish/l_multifasciatus.shtml you'll see in the middle one of the pictures I took at the lake showing the vast amount of shells these little guys had to choose from. ;-) The similis live in similar conditions in a few locations in the lake. L. similis are more apt to live among the rocks and pebbles a bit deeper than the multies. But even in that habitat, they have hundreds of small caves and crevices to choose from to live in. These are great little fish and I'm glad you're enjoying them. It's also nice of you to take the time to put them up on a webpage to share your fish with the world. Don't let any of the criticism discourage you. Amateur www.amateurcichlids.com
Cichlidiot - 20 Apr 2004 16:18 GMT In rec.aquaria.freshwater.cichlids Amateur Cichlids <amateur@snet.net> wrote:
> you like them. The graininess you spoke of could be alleviated if you had > more light over the top of the tank when taking your photos. The aggression I think the graininess of the Pentax photos was more a combination of my cheap scanner and using 400 ISO film. Probably mostly the scanner though as the photos themselves are pretty clear, but the scans were turning out dark and grainy even on the highest quality scanner settings.
> with the fry from the adults I believe you would see completely alleviated > if you added a dozen more small shells to the tank. In my 20 long with my L. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > habitat, they have hundreds of small caves and crevices to choose from to > live in. Shells are such an issue in this area. Very few fish places sell appropriately shaped and sized shells. What I have now have actually been gathered over 2 years of searching shops for shells. The conch shells were particularly a happy find since the wild caught males are about 2" long and need something the size of a conch shell. Part of the reason the two rock piles were put in was when I first got the similis, I didn't have the conch shells yet, so I was trying to give the males a choice of territory. Turns out the fry like the rocks more than the males.
So one thing a local store that doesn't carry shells (but sells shell dwellers, go figure) mentioned was that there was an import shop that sold escargot shells. I checked it out but what made me leery was it said the shells were prewashed. I know prewashed would be great if I were eating escargot out of the shells, but I don't know if this means just a good disinfecting with say boiling water or if I have to worry about detergents of some sort being in the shells. Any experience using "prewashed" escargot shells intended for human use in the tanks? I just lost most of my paracyps due to accidental contaimination from their tank's canopy. Don't want to go through the same with the similis. I had been planning to use the similis in the 10 gallon as a guinea pig, but now I'm too attached to it as well (and thinking it would make a good seed for genetic diversity by moving a few select fry from each pair to that tank to hopefully make a second colony of genetically diverse fish, the fact I have only two females breeding in the main tank right now is rather genetically restrictive).
> These are great little fish and I'm glad you're enjoying them. It's also > nice of you to take the time to put them up on a webpage to share your fish > with the world. Don't let any of the criticism discourage you. It was rather deflating. Took some of the fun out of my new toy (the digital camera). Probably why I was so defensive. Well, that and I've taken photo classes in the past. Practically lived my senior year of high school in the photo lab and the only thing keeping me out of the lab right now in grad school is the lack of privacy for my SSN in the current registration system the university has for the on-campus photo labs, so I refuse to register and put myself at risk for identity theft. Which is why I finally got a digital camera instead of macro photo equip for my Pentax and a better scanner.
Amateur Cichlids - 20 Apr 2004 21:58 GMT > Shells are such an issue in this area. Very few fish places sell > appropriately shaped and sized shells. What I have now have actually been [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > conch shells yet, so I was trying to give the males a choice of territory. > Turns out the fry like the rocks more than the males. If you're a member of Cichlid-forum, (www.cichlid-forum.com) Send a Private Message to "movingsram". He's a nice kids and I picked up my multies from him. He orders shells on line. Not escargot shells but the place he orders from has an actual assortment of different types of shells from around the world. While I was picking up my fish, he'd just received a box of a couple hundred of shells. I think it was like $50 bucks. Even though I believe there's a minimum order, you can order a box, take what you need and cut a deal for the rest with your LFS. ;-) Another option is to add more rocks to the tank. Similis are more commonly found among the rocks than among the shells so they shouldn't mind. AC
NetMax - 21 Apr 2004 17:52 GMT > I've put up a page with my current photo gallery of my similis tanks and > their fry. I got some good photos with my new digital camera in macro mode [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Enjoy. My fav was the one with the 3 generations of fry, but there were several other nice shots too. Thanks for taking the time to put it together & post it.
NetMax
Robert MacCara - 22 Apr 2004 01:06 GMT > I've put up a page with my current photo gallery of my similis tanks and > their fry. I got some good photos with my new digital camera in macro mode [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Enjoy. I did enjoy, especially as I've recently setup a 10g tank with some crassus in it. Very nice looking with brilliant blue fin tips. 2 pairs in the tank, lots of shells, small pleco and a few zebra danios to provide surface cover for the little cichlids.
Thanks, Rob
Cichlidiot - 22 Apr 2004 11:57 GMT In rec.aquaria.freshwater.cichlids Robert MacCara <rob@mips.ns.ca> wrote:
> I did enjoy, especially as I've recently setup a 10g tank with some > crassus in it. Very nice looking with brilliant blue fin tips. 2 pairs in > the tank, lots of shells, small pleco and a few zebra danios to provide > surface cover for the little cichlids. The crassus are smaller than others in the neolamp. brichardi complex right? I never was able to get the daffodils I had before grad school to be at any higher density than one pair per 20 gallons, at least once breeding started. They just got rather nasty towards each other. Never dealt with crassus however, so perhaps they're more peaceful.
Robert MacCara - 23 Apr 2004 01:26 GMT > In rec.aquaria.freshwater.cichlids Robert MacCara <rob@mips.ns.ca> wrote: >> I did enjoy, especially as I've recently setup a 10g tank with some [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > breeding started. They just got rather nasty towards each other. Never > dealt with crassus however, so perhaps they're more peaceful. The crassus are quite small - about an inch and a half (maybe) - are they are not very aggressive at all. Almost timid. They look after their own shells, and will hide in them rather than "defend" them. Mine haven't bred yet, but the two pairs have done some dancing, so maybe one of these days! Regards, Rob
|
|
|