Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Mammals
FerretsGuinea PigsHamstersRabbitsRats
Aquaria
GeneralMarine ReefFreshwaterPlantsCichlidsGoldfish
Birds
BirdsParrots
Miscellaneous
Animal HealthPet Loss
PetKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Pet Forum / Aquaria / Cichlids / December 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Reading water tests

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jon Pike - 12 Dec 2004 01:20 GMT
Should water tests be read with a light shining through it, and held up
against the white part of the card, or in shadow, held up against the white
part of the card?

Signature

http://www.neopets.com/refer.phtml?username=moosespet

NetMax - 12 Dec 2004 04:15 GMT
> Should water tests be read with a light shining through it, and held up
> against the white part of the card, or in shadow, held up against the
> white
> part of the card?

My understanding is that it should be held against the card and viewed
horizontally through the tube, while standing in an area of strong
indirect natural sunlight.  If the hue is difficult to match, then look
directly down the test tube, however the intensity of the color will
increase (darken), so ignore that aspect.  hth
Signature

www.NetMax.tk

James - 12 Dec 2004 08:48 GMT
> Should water tests be read with a light shining through it, and held up
> against the white part of the card, or in shadow, held up against the
> white
> part of the card?

I don't think it matters much really as long as  the same amount goes
through the tester as hits the color gradients. For me, i have always tested
without adding light that would cast any heavy shadows as well as testing
before any changes to the water. :-)

-James
Jon Pike - 12 Dec 2004 13:18 GMT
>> Should water tests be read with a light shining through it, and held
>> up against the white part of the card, or in shadow, held up against
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> tested without adding light that would cast any heavy shadows as well
> as testing before any changes to the water. :-)

It makes a big difference. If I shine light through it, it reads 0. If I
don't, it reads 2.

Signature

http://www.neopets.com/refer.phtml?username=moosespet

Jon Pike - 12 Dec 2004 16:59 GMT
>> Should water tests be read with a light shining through it, and held
>> up against the white part of the card, or in shadow, held up against
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> tested without adding light that would cast any heavy shadows as well
> as testing before any changes to the water. :-)

You should give it a try. For me it's the difference between reading a 0
and reading a 2 on my ammonia tester.

Signature

http://www.neopets.com/refer.phtml?username=moosespet

James - 12 Dec 2004 21:34 GMT
OK, here's what I did to kinda see where you were coming from. I added light
as you said and that washes out my sample in the tube. MY method (ymmv) is
to hold the tube 1/2'' away and yet parallel to the card, this gives
accurate reading for me every time.

That's all I got :-) Good Luck

-James

>>> Should water tests be read with a light shining through it, and held
>>> up against the white part of the card, or in shadow, held up against
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> You should give it a try. For me it's the difference between reading a 0
> and reading a 2 on my ammonia tester.
Jon Pike - 13 Dec 2004 03:27 GMT
> OK, here's what I did to kinda see where you were coming from. I added
> light as you said and that washes out my sample in the tube. MY method
> (ymmv) is to hold the tube 1/2'' away and yet parallel to the card,
> this gives accurate reading for me every time.
>
> That's all I got :-) Good Luck

I'll give it a shot, thanks :)

Signature

http://www.neopets.com/refer.phtml?username=moosespet

Margolis - 12 Dec 2004 13:02 GMT
> Should water tests be read with a light shining through it, and held up
> against the white part of the card, or in shadow, held up against the white
> part of the card?

most of them say to place the sample against the white background of the
card in good lighting.  Did you even bother to rtfm?

Signature

Margolis
http://web.archive.org/web/20030215212142/http://www.agqx.org/faqs/AGQ2FAQ.htm
http://www.unrealtower.org/faq

Jon Pike - 12 Dec 2004 13:18 GMT
"Margolis" <someone@somewhere.org> wrote in news:7qXud.1525$xM5.666
@fe06.lga:

>> Should water tests be read with a light shining through it, and held up
>> against the white part of the card, or in shadow, held up against the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> most of them say to place the sample against the white background of the
> card in good lighting.  Did you even bother to rtfm?

Wow, aren't you the pleasent type.
"good lighting" doesn't say whether there's light shining through it or
not.

Signature

http://www.neopets.com/refer.phtml?username=moosespet

Billy - 12 Dec 2004 16:54 GMT
?

| Wow, aren't you the pleasent type.
| "good lighting" doesn't say whether there's light shining through it or
| not.

He just gets grumpy sometimes, he'll be fine. <g>
   What that means, is just look at the card in a well-lit room,
without any shadows cast on the card. Don't shine light through it.
dr-solo@wi.rr.xx.com - 12 Dec 2004 20:25 GMT
take the cap off and look down thru the water at white paper.  Ingrid

>Should water tests be read with a light shining through it, and held up
>against the white part of the card, or in shadow, held up against the white
>part of the card?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
List Manager: Puregold Goldfish List
http://puregold.aquaria.net/
www.drsolo.com
Solve the problem, dont waste energy finding who's to blame
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unfortunately, I receive no money, gifts, discounts or other
compensation for all the damn work I do, nor for any of the
endorsements or recommendations I make.
JayB - 13 Dec 2004 16:11 GMT
> Should water tests be read with a light shining through it, and held up
> against the white part of the card, or in shadow, held up against the
> white
> part of the card?

What do the instructions in your test kit specify?

Signature

JayB

Jon Pike - 13 Dec 2004 21:05 GMT
"JayB" <jerry280@yahoo.com> wrote in news:qajvd.7755$ez4.7078
@news01.roc.ny:

>> Should water tests be read with a light shining through it, and held up
>> against the white part of the card, or in shadow, held up against the
>> white
>> part of the card?
>
> What do the instructions in your test kit specify?

They don't. That's why I'm asking here.

Signature

http://www.neopets.com/refer.phtml?username=moosespet

l.nave@comcast.net - 15 Dec 2004 14:06 GMT
> Should water tests be read with a light shining through it, and held up
> against the white part of the card, or in shadow, held up against the white
> part of the card?
>
> --
> http://www.neopets.com/refer.phtml?username=moosespet

I was taught in school to use a white background with a lot of light to
pick up the color of the solution for liquid tests.
Larry
l.nave@comcast.net - 15 Dec 2004 15:02 GMT
> Should water tests be read with a light shining through it, and held up
> against the white part of the card, or in shadow, held up against the white
> part of the card?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.