 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Pet Forum / Birds / Parrots / October 2004Feral budgies
There seems to be little or no action in the budgies news group so I am putting this here ... it should be of interest. If not .. delete. :) http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=572&ncid=572&e=1&u=/nm/20041018/ lf_nm/life_parakeets_dc These birds are Feral Monk parakeets not Budgies. >These birds are Feral Monk parakeets not Budgies. "They're generally agreed to be crimson-fronted parakeets, native to Central America. Marked with red patches on their faces, the green parakeets are bigger than the typical pet budgie most people are familiar with. " I am not familiar with this bird and just picked up "budgie" as the article said they are bigger than the typical budgie. Thanks > "They're generally agreed to be crimson-fronted parakeets, native to > Central America. Marked with red patches on their faces, the green [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Thanks What would be the point of posting this in alt.pets.parrots.budgerigars? So you got an erection over the word budgie appearing in the article. The birds discussed as the topic of the article aren't budgies. What's the f.cking point of posting this here? Not only are they not budgies, but this is a cockatiel news group? MJ >> "They're generally agreed to be crimson-fronted parakeets, native to >> Central America. Marked with red patches on their faces, the green [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > MJ I would say the "point" is because it is/was interesting and shows the adaptability of our birds.  SignatureDigital_Cowboy Live Long and Prosper ___________________ _-_ \==============_=_/ ____.---'---`---.____ \_ \ \----._________.----/ \ \ / / `-_-' __,--`.`-'..'-_ /____ ||- `--.____,-' >What would be the point of posting this in alt.pets.parrots.budgerigars? So >you got an erection over the word budgie appearing in the article. The >birds discussed as the topic of the article aren't budgies. As I said in the original post: "it should be of interest. If not .. delete." >What's the f.cking point of posting this here? Not only are they not >budgies, but this is a cockatiel news group? And what is the point of your dirty mouth? A weak mind and a limited vocabulary attempting to express itself, I suppose. No reply expected and no further posts from this end. >>What would be the point of posting this in alt.pets.parrots.budgerigars? >> So you got an erection over the word budgie appearing in the article. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > No reply expected and no further posts from this end. T.O.M., Don't let him worry ya. I can say that I honesty enjoyed reading the article. SignatureDigital_Cowboy Live Long and Prosper ___________________ _-_ \==============_=_/ ____.---'---`---.____ \_ \ \----._________.----/ \ \ / / `-_-' __,--`.`-'..'-_ /____ ||- `--.____,-' >>What would be the point of posting this in alt.pets.parrots.budgerigars? >>So [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > As I said in the original post: "it should be of interest. If not .. > delete." and you also stated that you were posting it here because there was no traffic in the budgie group? What sense does that make? The article has absolutely nothing to do with budgies. If you want to post an article about birds just do it. Trying to make up excuses for it is what makes you look like a twit of an a.shole. >>What's the f.cking point of posting this here? Not only are they not >>budgies, but this is a cockatiel news group? > > And what is the point of your dirty mouth? A weak mind and a limited > vocabulary attempting to express itself, I suppose. That's a very typical psycho-analysis from someone who has no clue about psychiatry (or much else for that matter). > No reply expected Why do you think anyone cares if you are expecting a reply or not? You obviously don't know me or you would be expecting this reply. > and no further posts from this end. Empty promises. MJ > These birds are Feral Monk parakeets not Budgies. Obviously someone who just looked at the picture and didn't (couldn't?) read the article. The picture used is of quaker (monk0 parakeets, but the article isn't about monk parakeets. Dumbshits who know nothing about birds think that know one would notice that they used a picture of some other species. MJ >> These birds are Feral Monk parakeets not Budgies. > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > MJ T.K., Get a frelling life. SignatureDigital_Cowboy Live Long and Prosper ___________________ _-_ \==============_=_/ ____.---'---`---.____ \_ \ \----._________.----/ \ \ / / `-_-' __,--`.`-'..'-_ /____ ||- `--.____,-' > There seems to be little or no action in the budgies news group so I > am putting this here ... it should be of interest. If not .. delete. > :) > > http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=572&ncid=572&e=1&u=/nm/20041018/ lf_nm/life_parakeets_dc BTW - this has nothing to do with feral budgies. Are there state budgies too or just feral ones? > > There seems to be little or no action in the budgies news group so I > > am putting this here ... it should be of interest. If not .. delete. > > :) http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=572&ncid=572&e=1&u=/nm/20041018/ lf_nm/life_parakeets_dc > BTW - this has nothing to do with feral budgies. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.