Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Mammals
FerretsGuinea PigsHamstersRabbitsRats
Aquaria
GeneralMarine ReefFreshwaterPlantsCichlidsGoldfish
Birds
BirdsParrots
Miscellaneous
Animal HealthPet Loss
PetKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Pet Forum / Mammals / Rats / January 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is it just me or...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Joanne - 24 Nov 2007 13:51 GMT
Am I nuts in thinking that rats are not disposable pets? When you take
in an animal, it should be a life long commitment, not when it becomes
inconvenient to you. :(
Signature

Joanne
The Rat Shack
www.jorats.com

Tale - 24 Nov 2007 17:01 GMT
> Am I nuts in thinking that rats are not disposable pets? When you take in
> an animal, it should be a life long commitment, not when it becomes
> inconvenient to you. :(

No, it's not just you, and you're not nuts. I totally agree! But of course
this goes for any pet; they are no "disposable" pets. Anyone who thinks a
pet is disposable certainly is nuts.

- Tale

Signature

"Oh, Rats!"
http://www.taletn.com/rats/

Michael Rozdoba - 24 Nov 2007 19:05 GMT
> Am I nuts in thinking that rats are not disposable pets? When you take
> in an animal, it should be a life long commitment, not when it becomes
> inconvenient to you. :(

No, I agree with you too, fwiw. I imagine there could be very extreme
circumstances where the pets benefit from an alternative home, but
generally I'd do all I could to avoid this & if I had to take that
option I'd be very picky about where they end up.

Fortunately, if we're ever in that situation, I think without exception
all our breeders have said they'd take the rat/s back - it's a purchase
condition with most of them that they are given this opportunity. TBH if
it came to this, the only choice I could live with would be if all our
rats went to a new home where I knew they'd stay together, perhaps also
being introduced to a bigger colony. Even that would be heart breaking.
Mandie @k@ Zepherous - 25 Nov 2007 02:36 GMT
> Am I nuts in thinking that rats are not disposable pets? When you take in
> an animal, it should be a life long commitment, not when it becomes
> inconvenient to you. :(

All of mine are lifelong. I once got two from a large pet store, they both
had
undergrown bottom jaws and had to have their teeth clipped regularly.
I pointed that out to one of the staff at the store incase the rest of the
letter were the same,
she replied that I could have brought them back and got a refund.
Would she have done that with her children?

About 12 years ago my dog and I were homeless for some time, staying a few
nights here and there with
different friends, it was amazing how many people didn't understand that I
would not give him up just to
get accommodation quicker.
Lynn "kitty" - 25 Nov 2007 19:39 GMT
I love all my babies forever. Their lives are short, but the memories they
leave on my heart last a lifetime.

Blessings,
Lynn kitty
Am I nuts in thinking that rats are not disposable pets? When you take
in an animal, it should be a life long commitment, not when it becomes
inconvenient to you. :(
Signature

Joanne
The Rat Shack
www.jorats.com

gazz@kampenwagen.co.uk - 25 Nov 2007 21:43 GMT
If people want a disposable pet, they should get one of those robo
pets, or a tamagotchi thingy.

if people can't handle the responsibility of owning a rat for it's
entire life, they should get a girl/boy friend instead, they generaly
handle being dumped for something more exiting pretty well, plus they
can fend for them selves when it happens :)

wouldent it be nice if pet shops (sorry for the language) made people
who wanted to buy one of their pets take home an  electronic pet for a
few weeks, then when they come back, they look at the data on how they
looked after it, and only if they did a good job do they get the right
to own a real animal, i'd bet half the people wouldent even bother
going back with the electronic pet, it'd be in a drawer somewhere
forgotten about.
Mandie @k@ Zepherous - 26 Nov 2007 01:38 GMT
> If people want a disposable pet, they should get one of those robo
> pets, or a tamagotchi thingy.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> going back with the electronic pet, it'd be in a drawer somewhere
> forgotten about.

Fantastic idea. knowing my luck if I got an electric pet it would steal the
batteries
out of everything else in the house :-)
Sadly a lot of attitude to pets are instilled into people as kids,
it's amazing how many pets I have taken from homes in the past
to hear the parents say, it's my sons/daughters pet they can do what they
want with it.
Yet the minute I waived  the fee for fixing their PC in exchange for the pet
they couldn't
wait to get rid.
I got two cockatiels once where one was almost completely bald, two mice who
were in
a cage on the floor with a cat trying to get to them, two elderly female
rats in a fish tank
half filled with urine saturated sawdust, a male rat who had never been
handled (my first real rat bite)
two terrapins, a rabbit that was in a cage so small he couldn't turn round.
Oh and almost forgot the rather large chicken,
she was amazingly hard to rehome, took me over a week and it is amazing how
much mess one chicken in a
bathroom can make :-)
Slint Flig - 26 Nov 2007 23:42 GMT
> I got two cockatiels once where one was almost completely bald, two mice who
> were in
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> much mess one chicken in a
> bathroom can make :-)

Sounds like you have some fun memories
Mandie @k@ Zepherous - 27 Nov 2007 03:46 GMT
>> I got two cockatiels once where one was almost completely bald, two mice
> who
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Sounds like you have some fun memories

LOL, some of them recent, my partner arrived here with a pheasant who,
had a fractured beak and concusion a couple of days ago.
He is now at Hessilhead wildlife rescue centre (who do fantastic work).
Tracey - 26 Nov 2007 10:04 GMT
> Am I nuts in thinking that rats are not disposable pets? When you take in
> an animal, it should be a life long commitment, not when it becomes
> inconvenient to you. :(

I totally agree, when you decide to give any animal a home it should be for
life, providing the best possible care you can.  Thinking about the time of
year we are now at, it breaks my heart when I hear about all the abandoned
puppies after Christmas is over - pups bought for Christmas presents without
a thought to the responsibilities of dog ownership.

Tracey
gazz@kampenwagen.co.uk - 26 Nov 2007 13:14 GMT
> Thinking about the time of
> year we are now at, it breaks my heart when I hear about all the abandoned
> puppies after Christmas is over - pups bought for Christmas presents without
> a thought to the responsibilities of dog ownership.

Even worse is that the film Ratatoilie has recently finished showing
at the cinema's, and will be out on DVD in time for xmas,
How many parents will get a real rat to go with the DVD for their
kids, thinking it'll be just like a plush toy, only better.

I noticed in one pet shop in germany that blue rats were suddenly
being stocked, and on their tanks were posters for ratatoilie!!!! the
DVD isnt out in germany till next year thankfully, but i wonder if
when it is, that pet shop will do a 'buy the dvd get a reme rat free'
offer :(

remember the ninja turtles films back in the early 90's, how many
turtles are living in the sewers after being flushed down the loo as a
result of that, i was at school when the turtles were the latest
craze, one kid had 4 of them, and he brought them into art class one
day to make little ninja swords and the like for them, which he tried
to glue onto their shells, the teacher didn't stop him till he tried
to paint the head band thingies on them over their eyes,
his argument was 'they're mine, i paid for them, and i can do what a
want with them'
Dewi - 27 Nov 2007 01:50 GMT
For sure, rats and other animals are not disposable pets! Although, if
someone is not able or willing to really look after their rats,
personally, I'd prefer to see these rats re-homed with someone who is
committed to caring for them. However it is not right to take these
rats back to the pet store (or worse).

Dewi
The Rat Lord - 27 Nov 2007 09:05 GMT
i think that as long as the reasons are good, a person can get rid of their
rat.

ex:

-they develop an allergic reaction to the animal. with rats, occupational
asthma can occur up to 10 years after a person is first introduced to rats.
if the person decided to keep the rat, their condition would become worse
and possibly become chronic.

- the rat changes in a way that makes it undesirable to keep. overly
aggressive animals have no place as pets.

- rats that have a contagious disease or parasite.

- they don't want it and can find a good home for it.

joanne, i can't help but feel that your comment is at least in part directed
towards me because of my comments in the "what to do" thread. if that is the
case, my reply would be: the poster asked advice. i gave it. what more can i
say? keeping the rat no matter what isn't always an option for everyone.
Joanne - 28 Nov 2007 20:51 GMT
> i think that as long as the reasons are good, a person can get rid of their
> rat.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>  

Absolutely nothing to do with you Rat Lord, I've just been seeing way
too many rats in the classifieds lately. :(

Signature

Joanne
The Rat Shack
www.jorats.com

jennjenn84 - 30 Nov 2007 09:19 GMT
While I agree that many people get rid of pets for the wrong reasons, I
understand that there are many reasons why you may not be able to keep a rat.
As for the term 'Disposable' I hate to admit it, but I have used the term
before.  Its hard to justify spending hundreds, possibly thousands of dollars
on a rat that cost you 8 bucks (and that's for a well bred one).  I love my
Scoot, but there are reasons that make it near impossible to keep a rat.  Now
my Scoot has given me no reason to ever consider it, and for a long time Scat
hadn't either.  But when he became extreemly violent, I could not keep him.
Many people suggested get him nutered.  I asked my vet how much it was going
to cost, and the price really made my choice for me.  Sometimes there are
issues that come up that cause you to make a choice you didnt want to make.
There is also a difference between the types of pets.  A cat has a lifespan
of 15-25 years depending on how long, so paying the money to get them fixed
and all the shots and stuff.  Now, I pay the money every time the rats get
sick, but honestly, spending 300 bucks for getting the rat fixed is crazy!
Especially when they have a lifespan of 2, maybe 3 years at most.  I'm sure
that I will get grief for this, and its okay, but I hope you will have heard
me out like I did with your messages.
O.R.R. - 01 Dec 2007 09:21 GMT
I assume you made the choice to have the violent rattie put to sleep judging
by the "tone" of your message which is completely understandable by me.

Nobody has the right to say that you must accept their choice for a decision
you must make yourself depending on your unique situation.

Only advice should be shared but not imposed by someone and their personal
experiences.

I hope this made sense. :)

Samantha C. in OK

> While I agree that many people get rid of pets for the wrong reasons, I
> understand that there are many reasons why you may not be able to keep a
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> heard
> me out like I did with your messages.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

jennjenn84 - 05 Dec 2007 19:30 GMT
I did not have him put to sleep.  I contacted my vet to find out about a
rescue since he isnt evil to anyone but my friend.  One of the vets there
wanted to take him.  I was honest about what happened and why I couldnt keep
him, and she took him and now he is happy and comfortable in his new life.
Scoot is adjusting to it all.
The Rat Lord - 06 Dec 2007 09:16 GMT
> While I agree that many people get rid of pets for the wrong reasons, I
> understand that there are many reasons why you may not be able to keep a
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> heard
> me out like I did with your messages.

i'm not going to give you grief but your vet charging you 300$ kinda pisses
me off. where i live, it costs $70.
Joanne - 06 Dec 2007 12:54 GMT
> While I agree that many people get rid of pets for the wrong reasons, I
> understand that there are many reasons why you may not be able to keep a rat.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> that I will get grief for this, and its okay, but I hope you will have heard
> me out like I did with your messages.

Sorry but for me, there's no difference, simply paying $8 for a rat is
no reason for not covering all their vet needs.

Signature

Joanne
The Rat Shack
www.jorats.com

Mandie @k@ Zepherous - 07 Dec 2007 05:35 GMT
> Sorry but for me, there's no difference, simply paying $8 for a rat is
> no reason for not covering all their vet needs.

I agree, I would pay any amount if I thought the vet could do anything for
Tar.
Rosemary - 07 Dec 2007 15:41 GMT
>> Sorry but for me, there's no difference, simply paying $8 for a rat
>> is no reason for not covering all their vet needs.
>
> I agree, I would pay any amount if I thought the vet could do anything
> for Tar.

I never cease to be amazed at how little a rat can be bought for in some
countries. Here, they usually retail for around the equivalent of $20 US,
and I think that's cutting it fine in terms of giving them the right care
(food, bedding etc.) until they're sold. I guess many retailers consider
the animals themselves a "loss leader" - they sell them at a loss and hope
to make up for it on the food, bedding, cages etc. that you buy from them
later. Either that, of course, or they're feeder rats. I've never seen live
feeder rats, just frozen ones.

The trouble wth selling animals at such a low price is, as you say, that
people consider them cheap and therefore disposable. Like cheap DVD players
- why get it fixed if you can buy a new one for less?

Grrrrrrrrr.

Rosemary
Kate - 07 Dec 2007 19:49 GMT
I agree totally !!! $5 or $500 it makes no difference.  When you take on
any pet you take on the responsibility for it this includes Vet bills,
feed, and personal medical costs if you have allergies.  I am on
histimines 24/7 and its because of the Rats and the Rabbits.  It has
never crossed my mind to rehome my furry family... and that is probably
because they ARE family.  I get a nasty reaction to my kids squabbling,
I wouldn't rehome them either..(no matter how tempting LOL).
I believe it has a  lot to do with how we see our Fur babies.  Are they
"Pets" or "Family Members" to you.

As for $300.00 for neutering or spaying... I think any Vet that charges
that for a Ratty should be shot!

My opinion and although I may raise the ire of a few, my posting is not
to be taken personally this is just my feelings.  I love my furry family
as much as my hairless bunch :)

Regards Kate

>>> Sorry but for me, there's no difference, simply paying $8 for a rat
>>> is no reason for not covering all their vet needs.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Rosemary
The Rat Lord - 08 Dec 2007 10:56 GMT
do you notice any side effects for those histimines? if you go off them do
you start to wheez and/or sneeze?
if so, you might want to consider allergy shots. way better long term than
being on histimines.

>I agree totally !!! $5 or $500 it makes no difference.  When you take on
>any pet you take on the responsibility for it this includes Vet bills,
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>>
>> Rosemary
Michael Rozdoba - 08 Dec 2007 04:00 GMT
> The trouble wth selling animals at such a low price is, as you say, that
> people consider them cheap and therefore disposable. Like cheap DVD players
> - why get it fixed if you can buy a new one for less?
>
> Grrrrrrrrr.

I know. Whenever we get asked what they cost to buy & feed, after
telling them we always make a point of mentioning typical yearly vets
bills, as they outweigh all other expenses put together.
The Rat Lord - 08 Dec 2007 10:52 GMT
>>> Sorry but for me, there's no difference, simply paying $8 for a rat
>>> is no reason for not covering all their vet needs.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Rosemary

i get 3 bucks each for my rats and the retailers usually sell them for about
7-8 bucks.
Samantha C. - 03 Jan 2008 02:01 GMT
I think she meant that the rat just costing $8 was just the tip of the
iceburg on many reasons not to spend hundreds and sometimes thousands on rat
care that has a high chance of not even working or causing extreme
discomfort afterwards that you have to have them put to sleep anyways.

With so many starving,disadvantaged,abused, and unwanted children in this
world, I just cannot afford
the costs of more extreme vet care. Prescriptions most likely, surgery no. I
have to put human kids first and then if something comes up with a rat
healthwise then I will consider vet care,and weigh the pros and cons, for my
ratties.

I may get flamed for saying this but family first ratties second. I know the
difference between a much loved pet and family member. I know some of you
will disagree and that is ok to have your own opinion.

Now just because I put human kids first does not mean I should not own a rat
in the first place.

Beleive me, my 2 female ratties are spoiled bunches. :)

Samantha C.

> > While I agree that many people get rid of pets for the wrong reasons, I
> > understand that there are many reasons why you may not be able to keep a rat.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Sorry but for me, there's no difference, simply paying $8 for a rat is
> no reason for not covering all their vet needs.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

The Rat Lord - 06 Dec 2007 09:12 GMT
>> i think that as long as the reasons are good, a person can get rid of
>> their rat.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Absolutely nothing to do with you Rat Lord, I've just been seeing way too
> many rats in the classifieds lately. :(

ahhh. my mistake. i wonder if it is fallout from the kiddies getting them
after seeing that movie...
O.R.R. - 01 Dec 2007 09:29 GMT
I completely agree with your views The Rat Lord.

Their are many many more reasons why someone may have to give up their
rattie or have them humanely put to sleep.

One reason may be the rats behavior towards children and any allergies the
child may develop. Not all children antagonize animals that attack or
severely bite them.

I do find it odd how parents will protect an animal before their own
children.
It's like they automaticly believe the animal over the child. Once an animal
gets the taste of blood, they are then put out of the picture with no guilt
whatsoever.

Samantha C. in OK

>i think that as long as the reasons are good, a person can get rid of their
>rat.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> what more can i say? keeping the rat no matter what isn't always an option
> for everyone.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.