Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Mammals
FerretsGuinea PigsHamstersRabbitsRats
Aquaria
GeneralMarine ReefFreshwaterPlantsCichlidsGoldfish
Birds
BirdsParrots
Miscellaneous
Animal HealthPet Loss
PetKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Pet Forum / Aquaria / Marine Reef / March 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Ozone

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Brian and Vanessa Smythia - 04 Mar 2004 15:26 GMT
Does anyone know if the ASM G-3 skimmer is ozone safe?
Marc Levenson - 05 Mar 2004 07:10 GMT
Do you plan to run Ozone on your reef tank?  Skimmers such as the ASM remove
DOCs, and Ozone definitely has an effect on water quality.

JB NY has run Ozone on his tank for quite some time now, so he might be the one
to contact.  You can find JB NY on reefcentral.com as one of the 50,000+
members.

Marc

> Does anyone know if the ASM G-3 skimmer is ozone safe?

--
Personal Page:     http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com/oanda/index.html
Business Page:     http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com
Marine Hobbyist:   http://www.melevsreef.com
Brian and Vanessa Smythia - 05 Mar 2004 14:12 GMT
Yes, I am planning on running ozone on a 110 Gallon reef tank I am putting
together (finally moving up from my 55 Gallon)

I know skimmers remove dissolved organics before they break down into
ammonia and nitrite but I am unfamiliar with the term DOC's.  What does it
mean?

> Do you plan to run Ozone on your reef tank?  Skimmers such as the ASM remove
> DOCs, and Ozone definitely has an effect on water quality.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Business Page:     http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com
> Marine Hobbyist:   http://www.melevsreef.com
Bill Kirkpatrick - 05 Mar 2004 16:40 GMT
DOC - Dissolved Organic Carbon.

Skimmers also remove particulates.

**************************
> I am unfamiliar with the term DOC's.  What does it
> mean?
Marc Levenson - 06 Mar 2004 05:47 GMT
Almost..  Dissolved Organic Compounds. :)

Marc

> DOC - Dissolved Organic Carbon.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> > I am unfamiliar with the term DOC's.  What does it
> > mean?

--
Personal Page:     http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com/oanda/index.html
Business Page:     http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com
Marine Hobbyist:   http://www.melevsreef.com
stoutman - 06 Mar 2004 16:29 GMT
Nope.  It's Dissolved Organic Carbon.

http://www.algone.com/protein_skimmer.htm

> Almost..  Dissolved Organic Compounds. :)
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Business Page:     http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com
> Marine Hobbyist:   http://www.melevsreef.com
Ross Bagley - 06 Mar 2004 19:53 GMT
> Nope.  It's Dissolved Organic Carbon.
>
> http://www.algone.com/protein_skimmer.htm

It appears that both of you are correct as to the meaning of DOC.

In the larger literature on pollution and water quality, DOC refers to
"Dissolved Organic Carbon", implying that the Carbon is the important
part of the mass of organic compounds dissolved in the liquid.
Apparently, the use of the more specific "Carbon" in DOC is a result
of the method of commonly measuring DOC which only yields the mass of
the Carbon involved in organic compounds in the solution.

In the aquarium industry, DOC is usually shorthand for "Dissolved
Organic Compounds" and refers to a category of pollutants in a
discussion of aquarium water quality distinguished from other
pollutant categories like "Particulate Organic Matter" (POM), etc.

Because aquarists almost never measure quantities of DOC, the
distinction between the carbon content of the compounds and the
compounds themselves has never been important.  As a result, "DOC" has
simply come to mean "Dissolved Organic Compounds" in aquarium
discussions.

It is possible that the larger population of scientists are rather
upset that aquarists have hijacked a term and changed its meaning
for their own use, but I'm willing to believe that context provides
enough information to determine when one is discussing a measurable
quantity (Dissolved Organic Carbon) and one of the categories of
stuff floating around in our tanks (Dissolved Organic Compounds).

Regards,
Ross

-- Ross Bagley       http://rossbagley.com/rba
"Security is mostly a superstition.  It does not exist in nature...  
Life is either a daring adventure or nothing."  -- Helen Keller
Bill Kirkpatrick - 07 Mar 2004 15:45 GMT
Well, hate to say people are "wrong", but if "aquarists"
have mis-defined the word then they've done themselves a
disservice in their ability to communicate.

When one speaks of your basic bio-filter you are working
with the Nitrogen Cycle.  Ammonia, Nitrite, and Nitrate are
forms of DIN - and I'd think people would want to
communicate that with some clarity.

Meanwhile, anarobic composting consumes both DIN (Nitrate)
and DOC, but does so very little with the Phosphates.  To
confuse the discussion by lumping it all under "Compounds"
makes it nearly impossible to communicate the facts around
how anarobic di-nitrating filters work, for example.

*******************************

>>Nope.  It's Dissolved Organic Carbon.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> "Security is mostly a superstition.  It does not exist in nature...  
> Life is either a daring adventure or nothing."  -- Helen Keller
Bill Kirkpatrick - 07 Mar 2004 15:26 GMT
No, actually.  "Carbon" was correct.  DOC is only one class
of material in various the nutrient cycles.

DIP - Dissolved Inorganic Phosphorous
DIN - Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen
DOP - Dissolved Organic Phosphorous
DON - Dissolved Organic Nitrogen
DOC - Dissolved Organic Carbon
POC - Particulate Organic Carbon
PON - Particulate Organic Nitrogen
POP - Particulate Organic Phosphate

Each of these reflect the primary bio-material cycles on
Earth.  Carbon, Phosphorus, and Nitrogen.  There are others,
such as Silicon.

The rule is simple.  We have Dissolved/Particulate,
Organic/Inorganic, and the nutrient cycle we're talking
about. We use these terms because each class requires
certain forms of remediataion.  One doesn't, even remotely,
treat DIN the same way as POP.

Here's some scientific lit. where the term(s) are used
correctly...

http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/solas/summerschool/handouts/LC2.pdf
http://jacquet.stephan.free.fr/engel_ame_2004.pdf

*****************************
> Almost..  Dissolved Organic Compounds. :)
>
> Marc
Ross Bagley - 07 Mar 2004 19:58 GMT
> No, actually.  "Carbon" was correct.  DOC is only one class of
> material in various the nutrient cycles.
>
> DIP - Dissolved Inorganic Phosphorous
> DIN - Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen

> DOP - Dissolved Organic Phosphorous
> DON - Dissolved Organic Nitrogen
> DOC - Dissolved Organic Carbon

These three would seem to sum up to describe the category of
DOM - Dissolved Organic Matter

Which would then be a substantially better term to use than "Dissolved
Organic Compounds" which, as is the topic of discussion, collides with
"Dissolved Organic Carbon".

> POC - Particulate Organic Carbon
> PON - Particulate Organic Nitrogen
> POP - Particulate Organic Phosphate

While these three would seem to sum up to describe the category of
POM - Particulate Organic Matter

I can certainly shift to use these terms from the larger scientific
discussion in my own language on aquariums.

One question, are phytoplankton (algae, bacterial agglomerates, etc.)
part of POM or are POC, PON, and POP limited to particles that are
nonliving?  Seems like it would be useless to attempt to divide them
out, so I may have just answered my question...

Regards,
Ross

-- Ross Bagley       http://rossbagley.com/rba
"Security is mostly a superstition.  It does not exist in nature...  
Life is either a daring adventure or nothing."  -- Helen Keller
Bill Kirkpatrick - 07 Mar 2004 21:19 GMT
> While these three would seem to sum up to describe the category of
> POM - Particulate Organic Matter

Sure, but wouldn't it be kind of limiting if we just used
the term "Color" (Matter/Compounds) to describe all various
forms of "Red"(DOC), "Orange"(POC), "Yellow"(DIN), etc.?

Of course, if you don't understand the subject or it is not
applicable to you (like a total color blind), then the broad
term is all you need.

In both aquaria, and waste water treatment, it would seem we
surely can't say these terms are inapplicable.  We use
various filters/media/methods, each to specifically address
the various classes of pollutants, and their makeup components.

If you take it to the extreme, why not just say there is
"junk", or "pollution", in our tanks.  Not very scientific
sounding, perhaps, but if "we" should use DOC in the way you
suggest, then why not use a simpler and less confusing word
for the stuff?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.