Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Mammals
FerretsGuinea PigsHamstersRabbitsRats
Aquaria
GeneralMarine ReefFreshwaterPlantsCichlidsGoldfish
Birds
BirdsParrots
Miscellaneous
Animal HealthPet Loss
PetKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Pet Forum / Aquaria / Marine Reef / May 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Wet/Dry advice needed

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
David - 19 May 2004 01:49 GMT
How D,

I have a 75 gal. With about 50+lbs live rock, Plenum, and about 75lbs of
live sand. I have a Red Sea Prizm Protein Skimmer and a wet/dry filter.
My levels seem to be fine but skunk cleaner shrimp and hermit crabs keep
dying.  Snails, soft corrals, and fish are fine.   The wet/dry is empty
and it used mostly for aeration and water movement. This tank has been
up for about 7 mos.
My question: should I be adding the "blue balls" to the wet/dry? Or use
something like a true sump or refugium?  Will this help with my problem?
Steve Sells - 19 May 2004 02:11 GMT
forget the blue balls. or any other color

what is your water? copper will kill inverts,  many other nasty's are in our
tap water.  give us some info and maybe we can offer advice...

Steve

> How D,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> My question: should I be adding the "blue balls" to the wet/dry? Or use
> something like a true sump or refugium?  Will this help with my problem?
David - 20 May 2004 04:19 GMT
> forget the blue balls. or any other color
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>My question: should I be adding the "blue balls" to the wet/dry? Or use
>>something like a true sump or refugium?  Will this help with my problem?

I had the water (from the tank) tested for copper and that ain't it.
CheezWiz - 20 May 2004 05:20 GMT
David,

Before the folks in this group will try to help you, you need to show that
you have the initiative to care for a tank. If you are experiencing a
dye-off, then everyone would assume that you have done a round of water
tests. They want the readings. What's the temp, specific G, where does your
top-off water come from.. etc... No one will reply to "My water is good..."

CW
> > forget the blue balls. or any other color
> >
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> >
> I had the water (from the tank) tested for copper and that ain't it.
Steve Sells - 24 May 2004 17:12 GMT
Example of my last test, measured after I topped off with 1 liter R.O. to
the "full mark" on the tank

Size 55 gal plus about 10 gal in sump  3 inch DSB. 7- pounds rock. 4 JBJ 55W
( 2-10kk, 2-actinic) with 1 Sailfin tang... misc. critters are doing well,
No outbreaks of illness, or  weird algae's, blah... blah...

Salinity  1.024
Temp    79 F (varies from 78F to 82F with room temp and lights being on/off)
pH        8.3 ( stable within 0.1 for over 5 years)
Amm.    0.0
Nitrite   0.0
Nitrate  less than 0.03
Phos,    0.1
Copper 0.0

This listing will tell you this an established tank, and not only that I
THINK its ok, but you have the data to show what is going on.

Steve

> Before the folks in this group will try to help you, you need to show that
> you have the initiative to care for a tank. If you are experiencing a
> dye-off, then everyone would assume that you have done a round of water
> tests. They want the readings. What's the temp, specific G, where does your
> top-off water come from.. etc... No one will reply to "My water is good..."
Steve Sells - 25 May 2004 19:24 GMT
7- should have read 75 pounds..

Steve
Dinky - 19 May 2004 02:24 GMT
| My question: should I be adding the "blue balls" to the wet/dry? Or use
| something like a true sump or refugium?  Will this help with my problem?

I've learned that true w\d filters are a no-no in marine tanks...the
nitrates they kick out are poisonous to the fish, which are much more
sensitive to nitrates than fw fish.
Marc Levenson - 19 May 2004 03:57 GMT
Actually, fish tolerate high nitrates, but invertebrates won't.

Marc

> I've learned that true w\d filters are a no-no in marine tanks...the
> nitrates they kick out are poisonous to the fish, which are much more
> sensitive to nitrates than fw fish.

--
Personal Page:     http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com/oanda/index.html
Business Page:     http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com
Marine Hobbyist:   http://www.melevsreef.com
Richard Reynolds - 19 May 2004 06:40 GMT
> Actually, fish tolerate high nitrates, but invertebrates won't.

to add to that SW fish will tolerate much higher levels than most any FW fish

Signature

Richard Reynolds
Richard.Reynolds@usa.net

Dinky - 19 May 2004 13:14 GMT
| to add to that SW fish will tolerate much higher levels than most any FW fish

That's contrary to what I've learned. Dammit back to the research
pages....
Marc Levenson - 19 May 2004 14:29 GMT
I inherited a tank with nitrates above 200ppm, and the tangs and blue angel were
quite active and unaffected.  The coral beauty looked bad though.

However, corals and various crawling livestock, as well as anemones, would
suffer and die premature deaths.

Marc

> | to add to that SW fish will tolerate much higher levels than most
> any FW fish
>
> That's contrary to what I've learned. Dammit back to the research
> pages....

--
Personal Page:     http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com/oanda/index.html
Business Page:     http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com
Marine Hobbyist:   http://www.melevsreef.com
CapFusion - 19 May 2004 18:09 GMT
> | to add to that SW fish will tolerate much higher levels than most
> any FW fish
>
> That's contrary to what I've learned. Dammit back to the research
> pages....

BTW, where did you learn or get those info.? I just curious, Dinky.
Some fish will tolerate more than other.

CapFusion,...
Dinky - 20 May 2004 02:39 GMT
| > That's contrary to what I've learned. Dammit back to the research
| > pages....
|
| BTW, where did you learn or get those info.? I just curious, Dinky.
| Some fish will tolerate more than other.

Here, mostly. It's possible I've been misunderstanding pretty much
everything since the git-go...I'll go crawl into a corner with some
docs and shut up......
Richard Reynolds - 20 May 2004 02:56 GMT
> Here, mostly. It's possible I've been misunderstanding pretty much
> everything since the git-go...I'll go crawl into a corner with some
> docs and shut up......

ive been kinda on lurk mode for a while, too busy breeding fish. But ive been reading
almost every post, that gets to my server. I would hope that if someone had said nitrates
were bad for *FISH* ida hoped in on that.  however just because fish are ok with nitrates
does not mean a reef tank is ok with nitrates, its also possible to have a FO with to high
a nitrate level and not have it harmful for the fish.  most people dont want an algae
infested cess pool for a tank just because it wont hurt the fish, even as much as an algae
infested cess pool can be benifitial to fish, most people still dont want one. nitrates
are the fastest algae/cyno fuel to remove, and the easiest to control and measure.

Signature

Richard Reynolds
Richard.Reynolds@usa.net

CapFusion - 20 May 2004 19:06 GMT
> ive been kinda on lurk mode for a while, too busy breeding fish. But ive been reading
> almost every post, that gets to my server. I would hope that if someone had said nitrates
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> infested cess pool can be benifitial to fish, most people still dont want one. nitrates
> are the fastest algae/cyno fuel to remove, and the easiest to control and measure.

If you want *me* to say it.... I will say it. Nitrate is bad for fish. Are
you happy now, Richard? Fish can telorate nitrate [high/medium/low] and seem
to be active, but it not really good. It just like breathing in second-hand
smoke or living in a smog city. If the fish immune system can handle it, it
just fine but if not, the fish will somewhat moving about. Probably a sign
of stress.

CapFusion,...
CapFusion - 20 May 2004 18:58 GMT
> Here, mostly. It's possible I've been misunderstanding pretty much
> everything since the git-go...I'll go crawl into a corner with some
> docs and shut up......

Heehe....
First and foremost.... Nitrate is BAD. No doubt about that.
If the tank are mainly have fish, minium or low nitrate can be telorable.
But do expect algae growth. Nitrate is one of the basic food source for
algae.

If you have invert or anmone, you might need to fix your nitrate proble from
it source.

CapFusion,...
Richard Reynolds - 19 May 2004 18:18 GMT
> That's contrary to what I've learned. Dammit back to the research
> pages....

like everything there are always exceptions

the big one I know about are sharks and rays but even then 100ppm isnt a big deal
considering thats probibly the most extreme case and the comparison was made against FW
there are some FW fish that wont tolerate nitrates in the 50's

without doing all your research for you, some larger fish(think tuna) have stunted growth
due to nitrates most smaller fish will be un-effected by nitrate levels well above 1500ppm
there are a few inverts which will handle nitrates that high, but most significant
intentionally kept ones wont, two that come to mind *very* quickly are brine shrimp,
however they also tolerate about 100ppm ammonia and choc chip stars seem uneffected by
400ppm+ but probibly require *very slow aclimation* I have 20ish(number decreases every 2
weeks as they are feeders) in a 15gallon pond thing, they were added when nitrates were
very low, and lack of waterchanges and constant feeding has got nitrates above 400 they
all are active and growing, ready to become food, starfish vs. nitrates is well documented
you can look around(search for the smaller brittle stars).  there are even some anemone's
that will handle high nitrates but again not desired ones (think aptasia)

Signature

Richard Reynolds
Richard.Reynolds@usa.net

Fred Fisher - 19 May 2004 09:25 GMT
> Actually, fish tolerate high nitrates, but invertebrates won't.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> > nitrates they kick out are poisonous to the fish, which are much more
> > sensitive to nitrates than fw fish.

I have a wet/dry but only for skimmer and heater purposes. I have no
bio balls in there at all. I have another 20 gallon that I use as a
refugium. Works very well and keeps A/N/N at 0. The macro grows like
crazy!!
Marc Levenson - 19 May 2004 14:30 GMT
Perfect!

Marc

> I have a wet/dry but only for skimmer and heater purposes. I have no
> bio balls in there at all. I have another 20 gallon that I use as a
> refugium. Works very well and keeps A/N/N at 0. The macro grows like
> crazy!!

--
Personal Page:     http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com/oanda/index.html
Business Page:     http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com
Marine Hobbyist:   http://www.melevsreef.com
CapFusion - 19 May 2004 18:11 GMT
> I have a wet/dry but only for skimmer and heater purposes. I have no
> bio balls in there at all. I have another 20 gallon that I use as a
> refugium. Works very well and keeps A/N/N at 0. The macro grows like
> crazy!!

Very good setup.
Me, too. I have the same method.

CapFusion,...
David - 25 May 2004 21:28 GMT
>>I have a wet/dry but only for skimmer and heater purposes. I have no
>>bio balls in there at all. I have another 20 gallon that I use as a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> CapFusion,...

Can you be more specific on your setup? Maybe I should utilize the same.

Thank you.
CapFusion - 25 May 2004 22:23 GMT
> Can you be more specific on your setup? Maybe I should utilize the same.

Water Pump:
Main Tank > Refugium
Sump > Main Tank

Gravity Feed:
Refugium > Main Tank
Main Tank > Sump

Sump job is to remove nutrient and bad critter
Sump [40GUS] hold:
Heater [#1]
Skimmer [Mostly turn off]
DSB [5in]
Algae
Agressive critter [shrimp / crab / etc]
Water Pump

Refugium is use to grow pod / algae / Nutrient
Refugium [40GUS]:
Light
Heater [#2]
DSB [~4 to 5.5in]
Algae
Pod
Co2

Main Tank [100GUS]
DSB [4in Front 5.5in Back]
LR
LS
Varies Inhabitant
Light
Water Pump
Heater [#3]

So in reality, Both Sump and Refugium are taking up nutrient.
Sump will also get fresh water mix.
Sump have a spare chamber for multi-purpose use.

Do you any more specific on the setup?

CapFuion,...
CapFusion - 19 May 2004 18:06 GMT
> I've learned that true w\d filters are a no-no in marine tanks...the
> nitrates they kick out are poisonous to the fish, which are much more
> sensitive to nitrates than fw fish.

W/D filter produce nitrate [very effecient]. Marine fish can tolerate some
high nitrate but will not kill immediate, though. But invert can be deadly.

CapFusion,...
Richard Reynolds - 19 May 2004 06:41 GMT
> My levels seem to be fine
so what are they ???

Signature

Richard Reynolds
Richard.Reynolds@usa.net

Fred Fisher - 19 May 2004 19:03 GMT
> > My levels seem to be fine
> so what are they ???

A refugium, at least the way I have it, is another tank that sits in
the stand next to my wet dry filter. Basically, it holds my caulerpa
and sand/mud. This is good for nutrient export which keeps my nitrates
down. Other people might use it as this AND keeping little critters in
there as well. On a different message board, I've seen lots of people
keeping mantis shrimp in there. It all depends on how you want to use
it. Mine is just sand and the caulerpa, as far as I know :) You can
also use Rubbermaid bins as refugiums as well, TONS of people use
this. I just happened to use a tank because it was laying around. HTH
CapFusion - 20 May 2004 19:17 GMT
> > > My levels seem to be fine
> > so what are they ???
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> also use Rubbermaid bins as refugiums as well, TONS of people use
> this. I just happened to use a tank because it was laying around. HTH

That is fine.
I keep all my trouble maker in there too. Maybe I should call it a prison
tank instead.

CapFusion,...
David - 25 May 2004 21:20 GMT
My water levels are as follows:
pH: 8.2
Ammonia: 0
Nitrite: 0
Nitrate: 0
Phosphate: < 0.1
Hydrometer: 1.023
ALK: Normal

That is all I have tests for.  I had my tank water tested for copper. I
was told it was not an issue.  Should I be testing for anything else?
I do about a 7 galllon water changes about 1/month.

> How D,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> My question: should I be adding the "blue balls" to the wet/dry? Or use
> something like a true sump or refugium?  Will this help with my problem?
Richard Reynolds - 26 May 2004 01:26 GMT
questions

> pH: 8.2
how did you test it? which kit or probe?

> Nitrate: 0
also which kit?

> Hydrometer: 1.023

you might consider upping this some, though thats probibly not important to the major
concern

> ALK: Normal
get a real kit or have the LFS test it using a real kit come back with a number normal
could be soooo many things

> That is all I have tests for.  I had my tank water tested for copper. I
> was told it was not an issue.  Should I be testing for anything else?
> I do about a 7 galllon water changes about 1/month.

why did you have it tested for copper, who tested it??? reasons I ask is IF the tank was
previously used you wont be able to measure the copper, but itll still kill things.

> > My question: should I be adding the "blue balls" to the wet/dry? Or use
> > something like a true sump or refugium?  Will this help with my problem?
no blue balls :D you probibly have a true sump already as most true sumps are wetdrys
without the bio balls :D its probibly not gona help :( but it wont hurt.

Signature

Richard Reynolds
Richard.Reynolds@usa.net

David - 26 May 2004 03:10 GMT
> questions
>
>>pH: 8.2
>
> how did you test it? which kit or probe?  
Tested with Aquarium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. High Range pH Test Kit.

>>Nitrate: 0
>
> also which kit?
Tested with Red Sea Reef Lab test kit.

>>Hydrometer: 1.023
>
> you might consider upping this some, though thats probibly not important to the major
> concern
to what?

>>ALK: Normal
>
> get a real kit or have the LFS test it using a real kit come back with a number normal
> could be soooo many things
What is LFS?  What "real" kit would you recommend?

>>That is all I have tests for.  I had my tank water tested for copper. I
>>was told it was not an issue.  Should I be testing for anything else?
>>I do about a 7 galllon water changes about 1/month.
>
> why did you have it tested for copper,
Because of dieing Anemone, cleaner shrimp, and hermit crabs.
 who tested it???
Local Pet store.
reasons I ask is IF the tank was
> previously used you wont be able to measure the copper, but itll still kill things.
Tank was converted from freshwater to saltwater by myself.

>>>My question: should I be adding the "blue balls" to the wet/dry? Or use
>>>something like a true sump or refugium?  Will this help with my problem?
>
> no blue balls :D you probibly have a true sump already as most true sumps are wetdrys
> without the bio balls :D its probibly not gona help :( but it wont hurt.
Richard Reynolds - 26 May 2004 08:38 GMT
> >>pH: 8.2
> > how did you test it? which kit or probe?
> Tested with Aquarium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. High Range pH Test Kit.

ok could be better but wont worry its more likely not the problem.

> >>Nitrate: 0
> > also which kit?
> Tested with Red Sea Reef Lab test kit.

not ok, you need something other than redsea,  the salifert and seachem kits seem reliable
IME there are others but redsea isnt a good one. you should check into this AFTER you
respond about copper below.

> >>Hydrometer: 1.023
> > you might consider upping this some, though thats probibly not important to the major
> > concern
> to what?

fix whats broken first then up it to between 1.024 and 1.026

> >>ALK: Normal
> > get a real kit or have the LFS test it using a real kit come back with a number normal
> > could be soooo many things
> What is LFS?  What "real" kit would you recommend?

sorry LFS == local fish store
really ive had close enough results out of all of the ones that give you a number, the
"ok" "ideal" "safe" ..... readings are not apropreate

> > why did you have it tested for copper,
> Because of dieing Anemone, cleaner shrimp, and hermit crabs.
>   who tested it???
good enough just needed the connection

> Local Pet store.
ok.

> reasons I ask is IF the tank was
> > previously used you wont be able to measure the copper, but itll still kill things.
> Tank was converted from freshwater to saltwater by myself.

did you use *ANY* copper in that tank, and i mean *ANY* at all ever, if so you cant use it
for SW inverts. and this result is why. the best hobby kit ive seen reads to .1ppm the
single source I found in 2 seconds shows copper toxic at .01ppm(there are better
references and I know that number is real low.)  if you have used copper in this tank you
do not need to look any further for problems. if you didnt use copper then get to the LFS
and get the nitrates checked with a kit, that gives you a number, and NOT one that uses a
plastic strip and color changing pads :D IME the free tests use the strips and the $ ones
use better kits my lfs charges $1 each test with 4 tests minimum

Signature

Richard Reynolds
Richard.Reynolds@usa.net

David - 28 May 2004 03:19 GMT
>>>>pH: 8.2
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
> plastic strip and color changing pads :D IME the free tests use the strips and the $ ones
> use better kits my lfs charges $1 each test with 4 tests minimum

I never used any copper in this tank that I am aware of.  I used to use
lead weights for plants when it was a fresh water tank.  That totally
messed up the fresh water tank and once removed the tank returned to
normal. As stated before, I did have the water tested at LFS and he told
me there was no copper in the water.  So you think I need better test
kits?  Could the problem be from a deficiency instead of a toxic?  I
currently use as additives: 2 1/2 tbs 2 x/week SeaChem Reef Plus, Reef
Complete and Reef Calcium.  To each gallon of water I add due to
evaporation (every 2 days) on weeks 2 & 4 I add 1tbs Reef advantage and
week 3 1tbs reef builder.  I do admit I was slacking for about 2 months.
- thanks.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.