> All you have is rock & sand? No animals or fish? If so, it'll never
> cycle in the true sense.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> didn't add anything, you probably won't see a noticeable cycle.
> Your bacteria colonies came along with the sand and rock.
Any live rock, even rock that is "cured" (do not let this term
fool you, any rock that has spent more than a few minutes out of
established water will undergo some die-off), will produce waste, and
the tank will undergo a cycle. You may not see a measureable amount
of ammonia or nitrite, or even nitrates, but the tank will cycle.
This is my preferred method of cycling, incidentally. It is not a
fast cycle, but in this hobby, slow is the best way to go.

Signature
Billy
----
Beta-Tester
WinExtra
Home Socrates
http://www.winextra.com
news://news.winextra.com
About our newsgroups:
http://www.winextra.com/Default.aspx?tabid=36
George Patterson - 23 Apr 2005 20:36 GMT
> You may not see a measureable amount
> of ammonia or nitrite, or even nitrates, but the tank will cycle.
> This is my preferred method of cycling, incidentally. It is not a
> fast cycle, but in this hobby, slow is the best way to go.
We're simply using different semantics. Many people consider the cycle to be a
situation in which there is a noticeable increase in ammonia, followed by an
increase in nitrites. In fact, there's another thread which contains "...fully
cycled (i.e amonia and nitrites have increased and then droped[sic]to
zero)....." It certainly appears to me that the OP follows this definition.
I would say (and, in fact, did) that his tank may not undergo a noticeable
cycle. But it may already be or become bacteriologically balanced without one.
George Patterson
There's plenty of room for all of God's creatures. Right next to the
mashed potatoes.
Billy - 23 Apr 2005 21:14 GMT
> We're simply using different semantics. Many people consider the
> cycle to be a
You're correct, of course. :)
David Cheney - 23 Apr 2005 21:14 GMT
Are you saying that it would be safe to move everything at this time?
>> All you have is rock & sand? No animals or fish? If so, it'll never cycle
>> in the true sense.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> method of cycling, incidentally. It is not a fast cycle, but in this
> hobby, slow is the best way to go.
George Patterson - 23 Apr 2005 21:52 GMT
> Are you saying that it would be safe to move everything at this time?
I'm saying that nothing will happen until you do. The bacterial colonies will
not grow until you provide food for them (urea, ammonia, and nitrites). The tank
is apparently stable at the moment with the rock and sand which you have in there.
If it were my tank, I would transfer at least part of the contents of your 29
now. During a "traditional" cycle, the ammonia levels usually spike at about 10
days, and nitrites become detectable at 14. You've gone 21, so I believe you
will not see any increase in nitrites with the tank set up the way it is.
I would also say that the contents of your 29 will probably not produce a
detectable rise in nitrates when they are added to your 75. The new tank is
large enough to absorb the additional load.
FWIW, there has never been a detectable increase in nitrates in my 125, nor in
the 100 I had before that (and I've moved several times). I've simply never been
able to find enough fish that I like to add enough load at one time to cause an
increase. Your situation sounds similar.
George Patterson
There's plenty of room for all of God's creatures. Right next to the
mashed potatoes.
Gerard Tremblay - 24 Apr 2005 14:32 GMT
I started out the same way with my 120 gallon tank. 170 lbs, of live rock
and 120 lbs of live sand. NO fish. It took 6 weeks. It WILL cycle. I added
bacteria but I don't think I really needed to. The live rock was overnighted
from Hawaii in an unsealed box and the rocks were wrapped in wet newspaper
so these had to cure in the tank.
> Are you saying that it would be safe to move everything at this time?
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>> method of cycling, incidentally. It is not a fast cycle, but in this
>> hobby, slow is the best way to go.
Ray Martini - 29 Apr 2005 15:55 GMT
I added 90 lbs of LR to a new 72 gallon and lights out for a month. Watched
NH3 skyrocket off the charts, then NO2 off the charts, even the daylight
from the room caused significant algae growth so it spent a week covered in
black garbage bags. After the month was over all levels were zero. That was
the longest month of my life, chompin at the bit to get animals in there. It
was totally worth the wait.
Takes time ....
>> All you have is rock & sand? No animals or fish? If so, it'll never cycle
>> in the true sense.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> method of cycling, incidentally. It is not a fast cycle, but in this
> hobby, slow is the best way to go.