Here's a reply to a similar question asked a while back:
Glass typically transmits approx 80% +/- of the visible spectrum
(400-700nm)
Acrylic typically transmits approx 92% +/- of the visible spectrum
(400-700nm)
Glass typically "filters" approx 90% +/- of utraviolet (<400 nm)
Acrylic typically "filters" approx 95% +/- of ultraviolet (<400 nm)
These numbers are "generalities" between plain ol' plate glass and cast
acrylic
(non-specific mfrs)
There are also some color variations based on the nature of each mfr,
grade,
and batch, ie.,, glass has a slight green hue which will vary and these
variations will affect light transmittal to some degree, and different
acrylics
made by different mfrs also have some color but a complete comparison
would be
prohibitive
Of course there are special grades of both that transmit or filter
different
wavelengths for different applications. When you get to longer
wavelengths
(>700 nm) they do a coupla switchbacks as far as transmission goes
but...
If you need more info, lemme know.
Krunchy the krown - 25 Dec 2005 13:23 GMT
> Here's a reply to a similar question asked a while back:
>
> Glass typically "filters" approx 90% +/- of utraviolet (<400 nm)
> Acrylic typically "filters" approx 95% +/- of ultraviolet (<400 nm)
Is the lack of exposure to the lower end of the spectrum(<400 nm ) going to
have an adverse effect on SPS,LPS or anemopnes?
I understand that the upper band(>400 nm) is essential to their well being,
but is the lack of the lower band ( <400 nm) detrimental?