Pat <ozman213@hotmail.com> wrote on Thu, 20 Apr 2006:
> I am looking to keep a clam or 2. An anemone. And a few assorted corals.
All requiring intense lighting. (Some corals don't, but hard/stony corals do.)
> 4. For not all that much more money I could get a 2 X 250 Watt setup. But
> that introduces more heat and will suck more power. Is that something I
> should do...or will the 175's be just fine?
The general rule of thumb for reef tanks is, the more light the better.
If you're deciding between 2x175 vs. 2x250, you should almost certainly
choose the 250W bulbs. Natural sunlight is far more intense than pretty
much anything we generate in the home. (Hard) corals (and clams and many
anemones) will grow faster and brighter with higher-watt lights.
> 5. Knowing nothing about corals(that's the next part of research). What
> impact do they have on the bioload of the tank. I know the theoretical
> "rules" of fish per gallon. But I assume that adding corals anemones and
> clams will reduce the number of fish I'm allowed to have. But I cannot find
> any information on what effect they have on the total picture.
No effect, at least in the way you're thinking.
The problem with fish is that, as they process food, they naturally produce
ammonia waste -- which is unfortunately highly toxic to themselves. So you
need to do something about that huge amount of ammonia, and the limits of your
ammonia processing (whether mechanical or biological) give you the "bioload"
capacity of your tank.
But corals, clams, and (to some extent) anemones don't really produce ammonia
waste in the same way. You can pack those things as densely as you want in a
reef tank, and it won't affect the water quality. (In fact, it can often
improve water quality a little, as most of these kinds of animals are filter
feeders, and constantly extract microscopic life from the water column.)
There are two caveats:
1. While corals don't pollute the water just by living, the way fish do, it
is true that nearby corals of different species can engage in chemical warfare
with each other. This is too complex a topic to say much more right here, but
it's possible that you'll get fouling of the water over time by placing
aggressive corals near each other, and having them deliberately generate toxins
(and releasing them into the water) in an attempt to kill the competitors.
2. (Stony) corals, clams, and anemones tend to require higher-quality water
conditions than fish. Fish are the ones that produce the ammonia, but they
can also tolerate more water toxins (ammonia, nitrates, etc.) than more
invertebrates. So, you may have an existing tank and a bioload that seems to
be "working" today, but from a reef perspective it is possible that it is
already overstocked with fish. Mostly depends what your chemical measurements
show for the nitrogen cycle.
That said, if your tank is currently functioning with excellent water
conditions, adding corals & clams will have no real impact on the "bioload
capacity" of the tank.
-- Don
_______________________________________________________________________________
Don Geddis don@geddis.org http://reef.geddis.org/
If you try to fail, and you succeed, which have you done?
Pat - 21 Apr 2006 18:03 GMT
Thanks very much for the input Don, appreciated!
miskairal - 21 Apr 2006 22:24 GMT
Thanks Don, that was very informative without being too technical.
> Pat <ozman213@hotmail.com> wrote on Thu, 20 Apr 2006:
>
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
> Don Geddis don@geddis.org http://reef.geddis.org/
> If you try to fail, and you succeed, which have you done?