Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Mammals
FerretsGuinea PigsHamstersRabbitsRats
Aquaria
GeneralMarine ReefFreshwaterPlantsCichlidsGoldfish
Birds
BirdsParrots
Miscellaneous
Animal HealthPet Loss
PetKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Pet Forum / Aquaria / Marine Reef / May 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Sump - Do you still need a cannister filter?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
dave - 15 May 2006 22:43 GMT
Just wondering really as i have a 125 gallon main tank (uk gallons) and a
35G sump with wet/dry and a skimmer is there really any need for a cannister
filter? I have live rock in the main display and in the sump refugium also
with a caulerpa bed for nutrient absorpsion. Hmmm.
Stocking is currently 3 cleaner shrimp, 1 Atlantic anemone (think it's
atlantic still trying to identify), 12 hermit crabs 1/2 red leg other 1/2
levimanus, 8 turbo snails and a common clown.
Wayne Sallee - 15 May 2006 23:07 GMT
No, there's no need for a cannister filter.

Wayne Sallee
Wayne's Pets
Wayne@WaynesPets.com

dave wrote on 5/15/2006 5:43 PM:
> Just wondering really as i have a 125 gallon main tank (uk gallons) and a
> 35G sump with wet/dry and a skimmer is there really any need for a cannister
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> atlantic still trying to identify), 12 hermit crabs 1/2 red leg other 1/2
> levimanus, 8 turbo snails and a common clown.
kim gross - 17 May 2006 03:35 GMT
> Just wondering really as i have a 125 gallon main tank (uk gallons) and a
> 35G sump with wet/dry and a skimmer is there really any need for a cannister
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> atlantic still trying to identify), 12 hermit crabs 1/2 red leg other 1/2
> levimanus, 8 turbo snails and a common clown.

I would say that you don't need the canister at all, the only reason to
use it is for carbon or other chemical media.

Also on your sump, I would suggest removing the wet/dry portion of the
sump also.  If you have enough live rock you do not need any extra
filtration other than the skimmer plus you have a fuge with algae filter
so you are set.

Kim
dave - 17 May 2006 19:37 GMT
Thanks for the advice, only have 15KG of live rock at the moment so will
keep the wet/dry in place until i have managed to aquire enough rock to
remove it!

>> Just wondering really as i have a 125 gallon main tank (uk gallons) and a
>> 35G sump with wet/dry and a skimmer is there really any need for a
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Kim
deep_end - 31 May 2006 05:24 GMT
Dave,

Depending on how long you plan to use the canister until you have enough LR,
you just MIGHT be fighting a losing battle against NO3- buildup. Since you
have a very low bioload now in relation to your tank volume, I would suggest
you just remove all biological and mechanical media in the canister, and as
Kim mentioned, just use it for chemical adsorption purposes - carbon, NO3-
resins, Rowaphos, etc.

Roger

> Thanks for the advice, only have 15KG of live rock at the moment so will
> keep the wet/dry in place until i have managed to aquire enough rock to
> remove it!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.