Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Mammals
FerretsGuinea PigsHamstersRabbitsRats
Aquaria
GeneralMarine ReefFreshwaterPlantsCichlidsGoldfish
Birds
BirdsParrots
Miscellaneous
Animal HealthPet Loss
PetKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Pet Forum / Aquaria / Marine Reef / August 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

1 of deep ocean's most turbulent areas has big impact on climate

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
nicholaschapman.fr@gmail.com - 11 Aug 2007 16:23 GMT
FSU study in Nature says newfound turbulence in undersea mountains
affects ocean circulation.

http://www.evolutionarycommunism.com/news/n111.html

More than a mile beneath the Atlantic's surface, roughly halfway
between New York and Portugal, seawater rushing through the narrow
gullies of an underwater mountain range much as winds gust between a
city's tall buildings is generating one of the most turbulent areas
ever observed in the deep ocean.
Wayne Sallee - 11 Aug 2007 18:10 GMT
This post, and web address looked a little fishy to
me, so I googled the information, and found a bunch
of web sites with this story.

The new story says:
"turbulence levels as large as one-10th watt per
cubic meter"

One-10th watt ?? that would be 1/10 watt right?
that's nothing. That would be the equivalent of 1
100 watt powerhead every 1,000 cubic meters. That's
not much water movement. That makes no sense at all.
Maybe I'm missing something.

Wayne Sallee
Webmaster@LeesburgNazarene.org

nicholaschapman.fr@gmail.com wrote on 8/11/2007
11:23 AM:
> FSU study in Nature says newfound turbulence in undersea mountains
> affects ocean circulation.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> city's tall buildings is generating one of the most turbulent areas
> ever observed in the deep ocean.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

George Patterson - 11 Aug 2007 18:31 GMT
> The new story says:
> "turbulence levels as large as one-10th watt per cubic meter"
>
> One-10th watt ?? that would be 1/10 watt right? that's nothing.

In addition to that, the article makes no claim that this "turbulence" is
increasing or decreasing. If it's been doing this for thousands of years and
keeps it up, we're in good shape.

George Patterson
    If you torture the data long enough, eventually it will confess
    to anything.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.