HOWEDY sindy SADIST mooreon,
"Cindy Tittle Moore" <rpd-info@netcom.com> wrote in message
news:dogs-faq/faq-list_1101618939@rtfm.mit.edu...
> Archive-name: dogs-faq/faq-list
> URL: http://www.k9web.com/dog-faqs/lists/faq-list.html
> Last-modified: 30 Jan 1900
>
> =======
> There are many FAQ's available for this group.
That so? Does it state in your FAQ's that
you're a dog abusing mental case and fraud?
> For a complete listing of these,
You got the COMPLETE listing, sindy?
> get the "Complete List of RPD FAQs".
You mean, the FAQs, not FACTS.
THE FACTS IS, you're a dog abusing mental case.
> These faqs are written by different readers
> of RPD who have experience with the breed
> in question.
You mean the liars dog abusers cowards
and active long term incurable mental
cases who hurt intimidate and murder
dogs.
> While in many cases (not all!) I post them.
You CENSOR INFORMATION to DEFEND
your alleged RIGHT to HURT INTIMIDATE
and MURDER dogs, sindy SADIST mooreon.
You've been BANNED from 2 obedience clubs.
> you should direct any questions to the authors
> of the FAQ rather than automatically to me.
BWEEEEEEEEAAAHAHAHHAHAAAA!!!
> You are encouraged to volunteer to write
> new breed faqs, please contact me at
> rpd-info@netcom.com for details.
You're a DOG ABUSING FRAUD, sindy SADIST mooreon.
> I am happy to help you archive the faqs properly;
The Amazing Puppy Wizard sez you can't
post your IDIOCY here abHOWETS no
doGgamenedMOORE, you dog abusin
mental case.
> however, you may decide to do it yourself
> or keep them offical; whatever.
BWEEEEEEAAHAHAHAHHAHAAA!!!
> Please do let me know about it,
BWEEEEEEEEAAAHAHAHHAHAAA!!
> though, so I can list it here
You HID your page on Forced Fetch
and COMPLAINED you'd SUE The
Amazing Puppy Wizard for COPYRIGHT
violation for EXXXPOSING you as a
dog abusing MENTAL CASE.
BWEEEEEEEAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!
> Complete List of rec.pets.dogs.* FAQs
> Cindy Tittle Moore, cindy@k9web.com
>
> Hosted by
> K9 WEB
They're DOG ABUSERS FRAUDS and ACTIVE
LONG TERM INCURABLE MENTAL CASES.
Subject: Re: Thinking About Using Shock Collars
In The House? Read This.
Date: 2001-06-21 09:04:00 PST
"Cindy" <tittle@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:d3oY6.57738$Uo3.1931139@news6.giganews.com...
> In article <3B31E172.BB1DB44E@ns.sympatico.ca>,
> Bre <barleeNOSPAM@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> > Hi Doug,
> > I hate shock collars and would never use one,
> > although I hear claims all the time that they do
> > not hurt the animal... Yeah right...
>
> > Although it seems to me that there is really
> > something wrong with the one you bought..
>
> > Too bad you hadn't tried it on yourself first.
> > Glad you did eventually though.
>
> They don't when properly used.
sindy SEZ shocking dogs DON'T HURT.
> This is, of course, a classic text book
> case on how NOT to use them,
You mean to NOT HURT dogs when you're
SHOCKING them to train them to be NICE.
> and is why I always recommend against using them,
BWEEEEEEAAHAHAHHAHAAAA!!!
> as you can see by checking
> archives at groups.google.com.
You're a dog abusing mental case.
> --Cindy
Tell us HOWE you DO use your shock collars, cindy.
Do you use it like amy does in her "swiss cheese" training???
Do you use it like you'd jerk and choke a dog
with a pronged choke collar?
Do you use it like you'd shove your fingers
down a puppy's throat to choke them out
of mouthing?
Do you use it like you'd twist and pinch a puppy's ears and toes?
Tell us HOWE you like to shock your dogs, cindy.
Forget about sending us to GOOGLE to get
SPECIFICS there's MILLIONS of irrelevant
posts there. HERE, we've got it straight from
the horses' @$$#$' mouth. SPEAK.
Tell us about your forced fetch.
Tell us HOWE COME you've been banned
from two obedience clubs.
Get the heel outta this business. J;~}
Subject: prong collars and shock collars are not = pain methods -
Says Dog Expert cindy moore
This is the only article in this thread
View: Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.pets.dogs.behavior
Date: 2001-06-11 14:58:51 PST
Hello cindy,
"Cindy" <tittle@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:JIaV6.39299$Uo3.1331248@news6.giganews.com...
> In article <20010611171800.04620.00000048@ng-ba1.aol.com>,
> J1Boss <j1boss@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >>Hi Jerry,
>
> >> If advice is offered recommending prongs or
> >> shock collars, the most effective thing you can
> >> do is to give *your* advice showing that you do
> >> not need to use pain methods to train a dog.
>
> >> You don't have to be nice, just a bit less of
> >> the bwahaha
> >> (bg) Alison
> > Alison - that would be fine except it would
> > be a tad confusing, since prong collars and
> > shock collars are not = pain methods.
Right. It's the INCOMPETENT THUGS like janet and
SADISTS like cindyusing them. They're the only ones
saying hurting dogs doesn't hurt.
Understand, people?
> > I believe that statement alone can be the heart of
> > the frequent debate here.
Well, that's because we've got a bunch of incomptent
Thugs who hurt dogs to train them and kill dogs they're
scared of hurting anymoore.
> Yep, what she said.
What do you do to a dog you're force fetching if he
turns to snap at you for hurting them, cindy?
You are aware dogs will try to bite if you hurt them.
Twisting and pinching ears hurts, or you wouldn't
use it to force dog to open his mouth.
Your koehler book says to beat and hang a dog that
tries to bite his "TRAINER." Tell us HOWE cindy moore
handles a force fetch biter?
> --Cindy
If you'd post your force fetch page here it will help
all of us to understand your expert methods. amy
is welcome to participate in our discussions and
post her "forced fetch without the Ecollar".
Yours, Jerry.
From: DEMON CHILD 666 (demonchild666@my-deja.com)
Subject: Re: To Marilyn Rammell about
Jerry Howe's abuse of dogs
Date: 2000/07/03
In article <20000628090023.10545.00000060@ng-fh1.aol.com>,
jfrchrdsn@aol.com (John F Richardson) wrote:
> the poster formerly known as canis666 writes:
>
> :i could pretend to not understand what
> :you find objectionable about jerry. i could
> :tell you i/m baffled by what you/re "trying"
> :to say about him. i could be real polite right
> :now and not point out that saying you/re
> :"honestly baffled by what [i/m] *trying*
> :to say about Cindy..." is just a subtle way
> :of saying "meds" "babble" and "delusional"
> :and that is anything but honest.
>
> Or, you could just say what exactly it is
> that has made you so PO'd at Cindy.
I already have.
> We all know that a lot of nasty things
> get said around here and we all know
> that there are some deep disagreements.
> But to suggest that everyone ought to
> know what exactly has made you single
> out Cindy for your ire and that anyone
> who expresses puzzlement is "feigning
> ignorance" suggests that you may have
> an elevated sense of how much people
> ought to know or care about who said
> what to whom in some flame war.
There never was and is no flame war between cindy and me. To
suggest, as you most certainly did in a previous thread, that
I have no right to comment or involve myself in something
without an understanding of its history, and then upon
discovering that I do have that history, to say that I have no
right to comment or involve myself in something without you
having an understanding of it's history is abusive in it's
double standard. To charge me with the task of familiarizing
you with that history, when you did not initially offer the
same is disgusting.
I do hereby dismiss your further underhanded and
biased attempts to shield and protect cindy tittle
moore (whatever other stalls and sidetracks you
may be set to try) from producing explanation and
evidence of her statements in the same manner
that I have been producing same for over one year.
I dismiss you on the same grounds that you
attempted to dismiss me. Although I do not
believe it is a valid reason for dismissal, it is
certainly good enough for you, as you tried
to use it yourself against me.
1. cindy tittle moore did, with cruel and malicious intent,
tag and snipe the posts of canis55 with effortless and
thoughtless single or double sentence condescending
remarks, and or "er uhm" insincere questions relentlessly
and for a period well over one year.
2. cindy tittle moore did, with cruel and malicious intent,
refuse to cease the above stated harassment when canis55
did kindly apply for relief.
I resent the 2 person grand jury you and lynn are attempting
to establish, and I resent the way you delete my questions to
you from attributed text as though that was a reasonable and
polite way to conduct a conversation. I protest, vehemently,
your request for evidence you fully know cindy herself
intentionally destroyed. And I very much resent the way cindy
is indirectly using both you and lynn to rob me of even more
time and energy while continuing to reserve her own.
It is time for her to explain and support her statements as
she so often compelled me to.
> JohnR
> Pit Bull Libertarian
>
> Never sneer at the power of a little
> pink squeaky toy!
--
You are deceived, for I will tell you. Yet if you were not
dunces you would never ask me such a question, for
is he not *corpus naturale*, and is that not *mobile*?
From: Helle Haugenes (haugenes@idi.ntnu.no)
Subject: Re: Jerry Howe?
Date: 2001-06-18 19:02:15 PST
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 01:00:29 GMT, "Christy"
<easily.amused@gtenospam.net> wrote:
[..]
>Cindy's post made sense to me, however,
It didn't to me, however. I was asking questions about
a method I don't understand and made it fairly clear
that I did not like the results of the method (ie I
would not use it on my own dog). To be honest, I was
rather surprised to get the reaction I got from Cindy.
She must have read an awful lot into my post that I
didn't write.
Dianne and Amy understood what I was asking about and
answered in a polite and informative manner.
>I have been on the NG for ages and
>so I'm aware of what she's referring to. Since your
>arrival on the group was pretty recent, you likely
>haven't followed the litany of attacks made by
>various people on users of certain training tools
>(e-collars and prong collars are generally the eeevil
>tools, but Jerry attacks the use of clickers and
>treats as well.)
Am I in the habit of attacking people? Do you think I
deserve to be put in the same category as Jerry? The
only thing we have in common is that we are in
agreement on some training issues (not all BTW).
>Basically, there seems to be a line drawn
>right down the middle of the NG - people who claim to
>be "Purely Positive" dog trainers, and everyone else.
>This line has not been drawn by the "everyone else"
>category, though.The apparent opinion of most, if not
>all, of the PP'ers is that the folks in the "everyone
>else" category are either dog abusers or
>wholeheartedly support dog abuse, by virtue of the
>fact that they aren't heaving those accusations
>of dog abuse at the "guilty parties."
Well, I have certainly not claimed to be 'purely
positive', nor have I drawn the line. Yes, my opinions
are different than others on some issues, and I have
no plans to use certain tools or methods. Neither am I
going to recommend these methods and tools to others.
IMO that would be very stupid of me to do as I have no
experience with them.
>The rallying cry of "dog abuse" has been led by Jerry
>Howe, and is aimed at any person who doesn't, how
>would this be put in UK terms - snog his arse? This,
>along with his otherwise odd behavior, has disgusted
>every logical thinking person in this group, but he
>has picked up his share of supporters - the PP crowd.
>Those supporters are more than happy to sling
>the same accusations of abuse, but turn a blind eye
>towards Jerry's claims of protection training dogs by
>a method that, if actually used, would truly be
>horrendous dog abuse. [..]
You obviously consider me one of the 'PP crowd',
otherwise you wouldn't defend Cindy's post to me.
Since seem to be the case I need to explain a few
things to you: 1) I do not 'snog his arse'.. I discuss
with him, not very often. I tell him when I agree or
not agree, and ignore him when he's being rude to
posters. I don't go out of my way to annoy him, just
like I don't go out of my way to annoy other posters
who I find just as rude. 2) I am not one of his
supporters, actually I am nobody's supporter. All I
write are my own opinions and thoughts. I may agree
with some sometimes and others at other times though,
just like you hopefully do to. 3) I do not accuse
people of abuse nor do I flame people. If you think I
do, please show me where so that I can appologize. And
last; 4) I do not turn the blind eye to a method that
may be dog abuse. If I was, why would I ask questions
about it to learn more?
And for your information, like you and 'everybody
else', I am getting very tired of being placed into a
category because of _some_ of my opinions. I bet we
agree with more than we disagree on, but that will
never be clear as long as we're fixed on categories
and 'who's on my side'-type of thinking.
Helle
The Puppy Wizard - 28 Nov 2004 17:21 GMT
HOWEDY sindy SADIST mooreon,
> Archive-name: dogs-faq/faq-list
> URL: http://www.k9web.com/dog-faqs/lists/faq-list.html
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> For a complete listing of these, get the "Complete
> List of RPD FAQs".
You want COMPLETE FACTS, sindy SADIST mooreon?:
"Many People Have Problems Getting The Pinch
Right, Either They Do Not Pinch Enough, Or They
Have A Very Stoic Dog. Some Dogs Will Collapse
Into A Heap. About The Ear Pinch: You Must Keep
The Pressure Up," sindy "don't let the dog SCREAM"
mooreon, author of HOWER FAQ's pages on k9 web.
You think HURTING a HUNTING DOG to
MAKE IT HUNT is NECESSARY???
> Complete List of rec.pets.dogs.* FAQs
> Cindy Tittle Moore, cindy@k9web.com
>
> Hosted by
> K9 WEB
Here's MOORE reasons HOWE COME HOWER
Gang Of Thugs are EMBARRASSED by their own
works. Here's the post cindy mooreon of our faqs
page at k9web threatened to sue us for copyright
infringement if we quoted it:
What is Force Fetching All About?
by Cindy Tittle Moore
Copyright 1997,1998 by the
author; all rights reserved.
THE FORCE FETCH
Alright! Now you are (finally) ready to force fetch
your dog. I repeat, you want to have an experienced
person help you out, someone who has already force
fetched her own dogs whether for obedience or field.
This step in the training entails what is termed
avoidance behavior. In a nutshell, the dog is taught
how to "turn off" a negative stimulus. He is carefully
taught that he has complete control over it.
This is a very effective way of teaching, but does
require a more astute sense of timing than some other
training methods and is very difficult for some people
to do, for a variety of reasons. However, if the dog
properly knows HOLD at this point, it's easily done
with a minimum of fuss.
Return to your quiet starting place, with the dog on a
collar and leash in front of you, sitting quietly.
Instead of opening his mouth as you have been for the
HOLD, put your hand through the dog's collar (to hold
him steady) and with your thumb and forefinger pinch
the tip of his ears and say TAKE IT (or FETCH, or
whatever you want) Watch his mouth closely -- the
moment he opens his mouth, pop that dumbbell in, let
go of his ear but not the collar, and PRAISE PRAISE
PRAISE. Do this three or four times per session.
When he is opening his mouth in anticipation of the
dumbbell, the next step is to hold the dumbbell just
past his lips. This next step is for him to move his
head forward that inch (or half inch) necessary to get
the dumbbell. At this point, he has a pretty good
notion that getting that darned thing into his mouth
is the way to turn off the ear pinch. Most dogs will
lean forward and get it. That's his second milestone!
Praise, praise, praise and repeat three or four times
this session. Remember, I said these sessions were no
more than 5 minutes or so each. That's still true.
Gradually extend the distance so he has to reach
further to get it. Now here is where a few subtleties
come into play. It's not enough for him to merely
reach out and grab it. You want him to commit to
getting it. You want him to be intent on getting it.
If he sort of limply reaches over and gets it,
that's not what you want. If you pinch him but have to
drag him toward the dumbbell, that's not what you want
either. We're back to the visualization.
What do you want him to do? You want him to, if
necessary, bust through just about anything to get
that dumbbell. So hold on to that collar until you
feel him pulling out of it to get that. That's his
committment.
You want to say TAKE IT and have him just about
explode out to get the dumbbell. As you get further
along in this, you will release him when he's made a
good committment -- this will help shape a speedy
response nicely. I think you can see why it helps to
have an experienced person around when you are
doing this! It can be difficult to keep all these
things in mind when you are actually sitting there
with a dog in your hands.
About the ear pinch: You must keep the pressure up
until the instant he has the dumbbell securely in his
mouth. Many people have problems getting the pinch
right, either they do not pinch enough, or they have a
very stoic dog in which case case a collar may be
needed to help make the pinch more effective.
Also some dogs are screamers, and if they find that
they can stop the pinching by screaming, they've
learned the avoidance technique just fine -- but not
with the behavior you had in mind!
Don't let your dog scream. Use your hand to hold his
muzzle closed and tell him to quit moaning. Some dogs
will collapse into a heap. Don't let them do that,
that's why your hand is in the collar. Hold them up
and get them back into a sitting position. What your
dog is doing is trying to find other ways of avoiding
the ear pinch.
You need to be firm and consistent and demonstrate
that getting the dumbbell is the only means of
avoidance.
Remember to keep him under control. When he gets that
dumbbell in his mouth, pull him gently around back to
you and sit him back down. You may in fact want to sit
him at your side in the heel position (whether or not
he actually knows the heel position), hold the
dumbbell in front of him, command him to take it and
then pull him back to a front or finish position
as you wish. The pattern will do him good later.
The next major milestone is putting the dumbbell on
the ground for him to pick up. For many dogs this can
be a big deal and may be difficult. Set the dumbbell
on the ground just in front of them, with your hand on
the dumbbell. He may not reach for it, he may refuse
-- keep up the ear pressure until he finally picks it
up. If he really doesn't seem to understand this,
then break this down into an intermediate step where
you hold the dumbbell, but about 1/2 way between the
ground and his mouth.
Once he's picked the dumbbell off the ground, that's a
major milestone and you are just about home free.
As before slowly place the dumbbell further away on
the ground in front of him. Make sure he is pulling
out of your hold on the collar before you let him pick
the dumbbell up. If he drops the dumbbell from this
point on, you will get control of him (put him in a
sit with a firm hold on his collar) and pinch him back
to the dumbbell -- he can pick it up now so there is
no need for you to put it in his mouth any more. HE
is the one responsible for getting it.
When he is reliably picking up the dumbbell a few feet
from you, then you can stop using the pinch at the
beginning of the exercise.
You will instead reserve it for when he drops the
dumbbell or refuses to pick it up, etc. So for
example, you might go out, place the dumbbell 6 feet
away, put the long lead on him, tell him to take it.
Let's say he hesitates and doesn't go out. Then you
pinch, force him to commit, send him to the dumbbell.
Let's say he goes and gets it, but starts playing with
it. Pull him in, and if he hasn't already dropped the
dumbbell, take it out of his mouth, put it back where
it was, and pinch him to it.
There is one last problem you need to watch for. Many
dogs, especially retrievers, will start pouncing on
the dumbbell once they are able to run out a few steps
to it before picking it up. So transition to this
point with a long cotton lead about 20-30 feet long.
With this you can spin him round the moment he scoops
up the dumbbell, teaching him that he cannot play with
it. If your dog drops the dumbbell, use the lead to
pull him back to you (do not let him try to pick it
up), and pinch him back to it. the basic rule of thumb
is that if he drops it, he will be pinched back to it
regardless.
Thoughts to Consider
Force fetching is never completely done, per se (as
with any exercise taught to a dog). You may need to do
a refresher course when it's something new to pick up,
or if it's something disgusting (like a very dead
bird) to pick up. He may also start to get lazy, you
need to keep an eye on him. You may also realize you
omitted some step in training him that shows up later
so you will have to go back and fix it.
But you should also take care to make sure he doesn't
forget any of these hard-earned lessons! Make him
carry things for you. He can carry his own ball out to
the park. He can carry his own utility articles to the
ring. He can help you carry a light bag of groceries
into the house. He can help you carry firewood. They
will just love this, and it's a good way to keep the
talents honed. Use it!
> --Cindy