Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Mammals
FerretsGuinea PigsHamstersRabbitsRats
Aquaria
GeneralMarine ReefFreshwaterPlantsCichlidsGoldfish
Birds
BirdsParrots
Miscellaneous
Animal HealthPet Loss
PetKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Pet Forum / Miscellaneous / Animal Health / January 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

stump pyometra

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Smith - 18 Jan 2005 00:19 GMT
In spaying, how common is it for a portion of the uterus to be left which
might develop pyometra? Some references talk as tho this happened only
rarely, by oversight. Other references talk as though some stump were
normally left.

Are there different procedures involved, one of which normally leaves a
stump? If so, what would be the reason for using that method?

TIA,
Joan
Andrija - 18 Jan 2005 11:35 GMT
> In spaying, how common is it for a portion of the uterus to be left which
> might develop pyometra? Some references talk as tho this happened only
> rarely, by oversight. Other references talk as though some stump were
> normally left.
> Are there different procedures involved, one of which normally leaves a
> stump? If so, what would be the reason for using that method?

Actually, pyometra is quite rare if the ovaries are completely
removed(pyometra being mostly stimulated by hormonal changes), and this is
the reason why some surgeons removed only ovaries and leave the entire
uterus inside. Other removed entire uterus and leave cervix inside, while
some remove cervix as well. I don't think leaving a stump should do any
harm, unless the castration was being done as treatment of pyometra. In that
situation it is dangerous to leave a stump as it may contain pus as well.
Margaret S. - 18 Jan 2005 21:03 GMT
> > In spaying, how common is it for a portion of the uterus to be left which
> > might develop pyometra? Some references talk as tho this happened only
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> uterus inside. Other removed entire uterus and leave cervix inside, while
> some remove cervix as well.

When a breeder wants a sexually active female for 'sterile mating' to keep
his toms happy (female equivalent of a 'teaser tom'), one or both ovaries
would need to be retained. In this case, is there a procedure that normally
leaves no stump or other uterine tissue?

Margaret S.
Deborah, DVM - 19 Jan 2005 13:47 GMT
> In spaying, how common is it for a portion of the uterus to be left which
> might develop pyometra? Some references talk as tho this happened only
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> TIA,
> Joan

What I was taught, in a U.S. vet school, and what I've read in most text
books, is to remove the uterus just above the cervix, so you are leaving the
cervix itself.  Inevitably though there is going to be a little bit of
uterine tissue, where you have tied your ligatures.  Depending on how many
ligatures you tie, and where exactly you place them, you might wind up with
a bit more or less uterine tissue with different surgeons.  In my personal
opinion, it would be more unusual to NOT have a bit of a "stump" left.  But
still, we very very rarely see stump pyometra (I've never seen it in 8 yrs
of practice), simply because you usually have removed all the ovarian
tissue, and don't have the hormones that are responsible for pyometra (in
general).

Deborah, DVM
Ashley - 19 Jan 2005 18:29 GMT
>> In spaying, how common is it for a portion of the uterus to be left which
>> might develop pyometra? Some references talk as tho this happened only
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> the
> cervix itself.

Why do you leave the cervix? Just curious.
Deborah, DVM - 20 Jan 2005 00:34 GMT
> >> In spaying, how common is it for a portion of the uterus to be left which
> >> might develop pyometra? Some references talk as tho this happened only
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Why do you leave the cervix? Just curious.

no idea, it's just what we were taught!   :-)   I presume it has something
to do with not accidentally incorporating the bladder/ureters/urethra into
your sutures.

Deborah, DVM
Ashley - 20 Jan 2005 05:31 GMT
> no idea, it's just what we were taught!   :-)

This, IME, is why we do most things :-)

I presume it has something
> to do with not accidentally incorporating the bladder/ureters/urethra into
> your sutures.
>
> Deborah, DVM
zuzu22@webtv.net - 24 Jan 2005 16:59 GMT
Joan wrote:
<snip>

Gee, "Joan Marianne Margaret", why are you posting using one fake
identity and then posting in this same thread using yet another fake
identity?

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


Mary - 24 Jan 2005 18:02 GMT
> Joan wrote:
> <snip>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Megan

Megan, do you think Margaret hurts animals?
zuzu22@webtv.net - 24 Jan 2005 19:53 GMT
>Megan, do you think Margaret hurts
>animals?

Since she claims she "spays, but leaves the ovaries" of all her female
cats, and this forces them to live a miserable life of repeated heats
and ever increasing risk of cancers and stump pyometra, yes I do. I
suspect that's just the tip of the iceberg.

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


Mary - 24 Jan 2005 20:20 GMT
> >Megan, do you think Margaret hurts
> >animals?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Megan

I kind of wonder about her too. She says she is not
a breeder. Why subject the cats to heat?
Margaret S. - 24 Jan 2005 21:29 GMT
/snip/

> She says she is not
> a breeder. Why subject the cats to heat?

When people say things like this, it often turns out that they are thinking
of heat periods when the cat is PREVENTED from mating, as heat without
mating is in fact stressful.

When a pair of cats peacefully share an indoor/outdoor home and the male is
right there for the female as soon as she goes in heat, and no one tries to
keep them separate, there need be no stress of calling and waiting. My
females never needed to spray, sfaik; certainly they never sprayed in the
house. Mine finished their mating in a day or two, without stress.

After mating, my cats showed no sign of 'false pregnancy', but iirc they
could go anywhere from 6 months to 2 months between heats, depending on the
weather and other factors.

The shortest interval I have heard of, was a breeder's cat, brought out of
heat each time by  'sterile matings', who iirc stayed out about three weeks
between heats; she was mating with a vasectomied tom ('teaser tom').

Margaret S.
Signature

Who is speaking of "remove the uterus but leave the ovaries", not of tubal
ligation.
Nothing I say is professional advice. Consult your own doctor, lawyer,
veterinarian, butcher, baker, and candlestick maker.

Smith - 24 Jan 2005 22:25 GMT
Quick clarification here:

/snip/

> After mating, my ["remove the uterus but leave the ovaries"] cats showed
no sign of 'false pregnancy', but iirc they could go anywhere from 6 months
to 2 months between heats, depending on the weather and other factors.

> The shortest interval I have heard of [for cats allowed to mate], was a
breeder's cat, brought out of heat each time by  'sterile matings', who iirc
stayed out about three weeks between heats; she was [an intact breeding
queen] mating with a vasectomied tom ('teaser tom').

Margaret S.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 24 Jan 2005 22:47 GMT
>Why subject the cats to heat?

Because in Marianne/Joan/Margaret's warped and ignorant world she
believes that
"if you've been putting off spaying because of personality
change, you can avoid that by telling the vet "spay but leave the
ovaries."
Then she keeps her natural personality."

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


Mary - 25 Jan 2005 01:55 GMT
> >Why subject the cats to heat?
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Megan

What do the vets say about this?
zuzu22@webtv.net - 25 Jan 2005 02:11 GMT
>What do vets say about this?

They say that ovariohysterectomy doesn't change a cat's personality. I'd
say the UC Davis Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital is a very reliable
source:
http://www.vmth.ucdavis.edu/home/beh/feline_behavior/spay.html

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


Margaret S. - 25 Jan 2005 03:30 GMT
/snip/

> What do the vets say about this?

Good question. That's the bottom line. If leaving both full ovaries when the
uterus is removed really made a significant difference in danger of a
serious stump pyometra, then it seems that some vet would have mentioned
that tidbit of news to me.

In 40 years, on 3 US coasts, I've had this surgery performed by perhaps 10
different veterinarians; none seemed unfamiliar with this method or
reluctant to do it. One said other customers preferred keeping one ovary not
both. (One vet made a pass at me. :)

40 years ago I asked a vet about tubal ligation and explained that I wanted
my cat to keep her natural personality and continue mating. For my purpose
he recommended removing the uterus but leaving the ovaries
('non-ovario-hysterectomy') rather than tubal ligation, saying that removing
the uterus would prevent possible uterus problems later.

It worked fine, so I used non-ovario-hysterectomy with quite a few other
cats and dogs over the years. None of my animals got mammary tumors -- nor
did they get any kind of pyometra or other reproductive system problems. Nor
did they have false pregnancies. They came in heat about as often as before,
mated, finished the heat quickly. They had no serious on-going health
problems of any kind.

Maybe it's a fluke -- lucky in my animals' genes and in my vets. :) Or maybe
it's that animals who get to mate promptly whenever they go in heat, are
less likely to get a stump pyometra even with full ovaries. Other theories
welcome.

But I do find that telling people about a non-desexing method gets a lot of
people to stop producing litters, who would never agree to conventional
spaying. If there are ways to adjust the non-desexing surgery to minimize
risk of stump pyometra, I'd like to know about them. If tubal ligation is in
fact just as good as "remove the uterus but leave the ovaries", I'd like to
know that too, as tubal ligation is what most people begin by asking about.

Margaret S.
who hopes she has finally got the defaults set right for this ng
Mary - 25 Jan 2005 19:21 GMT
"Margaret S." <email@withheld.com> wrote :

> If there are ways to adjust the non-desexing surgery to minimize
> risk of stump pyometra, I'd like to know about them.

Do you consider women who have had complete hysterectomies
"desexed?" My sister had one at age 25 and she didn't seem
different at all. My cats are still very "girly," sans ovaries.
Are you actually saying that an animal loses its gender
when it loses its "package," so to speak?
Margaret S. - 25 Jan 2005 21:50 GMT
> "Margaret S." <email@withheld.com> wrote :
>
> > If there are ways to adjust the non-desexing surgery to minimize
> > risk of stump pyometra, I'd like to know about them.

/snip/

> Are you actually saying that an animal loses its gender
> when it loses its "package," so to speak?

I've seen 'desexing a female animal' defined as removal of both ovaries (and
any stray ovarian tissue, I presume). That is the sense in which I'm using
the term.

Margaret S.
Signature

Nothing I say is professional advice. Consult your own doctor, lawyer,
veterinarian, butcher, baker, and candlestick maker.

Mary - 25 Jan 2005 23:11 GMT
> > "Margaret S." <email@withheld.com> wrote :
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> any stray ovarian tissue, I presume). That is the sense in which I'm using
> the term.

Okay. Now tell me why you would rather not remove your
cats' ovaries along with their uteri.
John Hasler - 25 Jan 2005 22:31 GMT
> My cats are still very "girly," sans ovaries.  Are you actually saying
> that an animal loses its gender when it loses its "package," so to speak?

Words have gender.  Animals (including people) have sex.  And animals that
have their testicles or ovaries removed exhibit greatly reduced sexual
behavior.   That's the main reason we geld male horses.
Signature

John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA

Mary - 25 Jan 2005 23:13 GMT
> > My cats are still very "girly," sans ovaries.  Are you actually saying
> > that an animal loses its gender when it loses its "package," so to speak?
>
> Words have gender.  Animals (including people) have sex.

Right you are. Thanks.

>And animals that
> have their testicles or ovaries removed exhibit greatly reduced sexual
> behavior.   That's the main reason we geld male horses.

Okay. So this means there is a reason Margaret wants her cats to go
into heat, and the reason is not breeding. Margaret, can you tell
us why you want your female cats to go into heat when they can
no longer breed, e.g. no longer have wombs?
Margaret S. - 26 Jan 2005 01:13 GMT
/snip/
> >And animals that
> > have their testicles or ovaries removed exhibit greatly reduced sexual
> > behavior.   That's the main reason we geld male horses.

> Okay. So this means there is a reason Margaret wants her cats to go
> into heat, and the reason is not breeding. Margaret, can you tell
> us why you want your female cats to go into heat when they can
> no longer breed, e.g. no longer have wombs?

I'm not going to risk disrupting alt.med.veterinary (or anywhere else on
Usenet) by attracting the usual woo-woo flamers. I'm working on my website
today so I just put up a page where we can talk about this issue if you
insist -- and anyone else who is interested and can remain civil and
rational. :) I've put a link "Note to Mary Smith about desexing" on the
first page after the entry page.

But I'd really so much rather see more discussion on the thread topic --
technical aspects of various surgical alternatives as related to stump
pyometra. Or incidence of stump pyometra in animals who accidentally had an
ovarian fragment left and were allowed to continue mating. There must be a
few such cases when the owner said: "Don't open her up again. She's not
having babies, she and her mate are happy, we'll live with the fragment and
the mating." (My animals came in heat about as often as before, not
'continuously'.) -- Hm, for that matter, I'd love to have some knowledgeable
remarks on *those* issues on my site!

Margaret S.
Signature

http://www.sangerfan.com
Nothing I say is professional advice. Consult your own doctor, lawyer,
veterinarian, butcher, baker, and candlestick maker.

Mary - 26 Jan 2005 02:18 GMT
> /snip/
> > >And animals that
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I'm not going to risk disrupting alt.med.veterinary (or anywhere else on
> Usenet) by attracting the usual woo-woo flamers.

I asked you a simple question.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.