Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Mammals
FerretsGuinea PigsHamstersRabbitsRats
Aquaria
GeneralMarine ReefFreshwaterPlantsCichlidsGoldfish
Birds
BirdsParrots
Miscellaneous
Animal HealthPet Loss
PetKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Pet Forum / Miscellaneous / Animal Health / February 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Lump/mass on dog's elbow

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
hlorange@sheeo.org - 23 Feb 2005 17:28 GMT
Our 3 year old lab has a peanut-sized lump on the elbow of his front
leg.  It has been there at least 2 months (when we got him from the
shelter) and 2 different needle aspirations have been "inconclusive."
A biopsy was taken and sent to the CSU vet hospotal but it will take a
week for the results.  Blood work has been normal.  It's hard and under
the skin.  It's so hard the vet was unable to do a slice biopsy and had
to take a core instead. What puzzles the vet is that each procedure
(aspirations and biopsy) has generated a lot of "milky white fluid".
This might indicate a foreign body but it looks like another small lump
is forming indicating some kind of growth.

Ideas?
Andrija - 23 Feb 2005 21:05 GMT
> Our 3 year old lab has a peanut-sized lump on the elbow of his front
> leg.  It has been there at least 2 months (when we got him from the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> This might indicate a foreign body but it looks like another small lump
> is forming indicating some kind of growth.

> Ideas?

I don't have an idea what that might be. However, I find it somewhat amusing
that something the size of a peanut has to be aspirated and biopsized
instead taking it all out, especially if the "tumor" is solid and with clear
borders.

I'll check out my literature for anything which might help.
buglady - 23 Feb 2005 23:27 GMT
. However, I find it somewhat amusing
> that something the size of a peanut has to be aspirated and biopsized
> instead taking it all out, especially if the "tumor" is solid and with clear
> borders.

.........how do you know the borders are clear?  It may feel like it, but
then again, they may not be as discrete as they feel.  And I think elbows
might be hard to take lumps from as there's not a lot of extra skin to
stitch up.  If it was mast cell I'd certainly want them to take the
requisite margin - which would not be necessary if it wasn't.

buglady
take out the dog before replying
Deborah, DVM - 23 Feb 2005 23:53 GMT
> . However, I find it somewhat amusing
>> that something the size of a peanut has to be aspirated and biopsized
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> buglady
> take out the dog before replying

Yes but if you do an excisional biopsy, i.e. take the whole mass with
moderate margins, which should be possible on the elbow if it is really only
pea sized, then if it is *not* a mast cell tumor you are done.  And if it
*is* a mast cell tumor then you just go back in and take extra tissue.  At
least then you have a good chance that you won't have to go back in
surgically and put the dog through anesthesia again, whereas if all you do
is biopsy, you *definitely* have to go back in again!

I too was wondering about the logic in aspirations and punch biopsies of a
"small" mass!

Deborah, DVM
Deborah, DVM - 23 Feb 2005 23:55 GMT
> if it is really only pea sized,

Whoops meant peanut....still small relative to the size of a lab....

Deborah, DVM
buglady - 24 Feb 2005 12:35 GMT
> Yes but if you do an excisional biopsy, i.e. take the whole mass with
> moderate margins, which should be possible on the elbow if it is really only
> pea sized, then if it is *not* a mast cell tumor you are done.  And if it
> *is* a mast cell tumor then you just go back in and take extra tissue.

.............Deb, I read a study a long time ago that mentioned that success
in MCT was a sufficient margin on the first surgery and the expertise of the
surgeon (i.e., the more surgeries of this kind the doc had done the better).
So if you took a margin comparable to a Grade II tumor, then that might be
true.

http://www.hammocksvet.com/NewsArticles/PTCancer.htm
"A biopsy or tissue aspirate should be done if it will change the outcome
of treatment or surgery. For example, a mast cell tumor requires 1 ½ inches
of tumor free tissue to be taken to ensure 'clean margins'; normal surgical
rules recommend a ¼ inch margin. Without a pre-operative tissue aspirate
your dog may need two operations to remove the entire tumor; if we do an
aspirate pre-op the surgeon can remove it all the first time. In stitches
terms, a pencil eraser sized non mast cell tumor would take about 4
stitches; the same sized mast cell tumor would take about 12 stitches! (FYI
mast cell tumor is the most common skin tumor in dogs and it is very
unpredictable)."

http://cliniciansbrief.com/cb/capsules/may04capsules.asp
Surgical Margins for Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumors
Tumors were excised routinely, fixed in formalin, graded, and histologically
examined for neoplastic mast cells in the margins. All grade 1 tumors were
completely excised at all margins. Seventy-five percent of all grade 2
tumors were completely excised at the 1-cm margin, and 100% were completely
excised at the 2-cm margin. Grade 2 tumors located on the hind limbs of 2
dogs were excised with a complete but close (within 1-mm) deep margin. Their
results suggested that a 2-cm lateral margin with a deep margin of 1 fascial
plane is sufficient for complete excision of grade 1 and grade 2 MCTs.  In
another retrospective study evaluating the success of surgical treatment for
70 MCTs affecting the trunk and limbs of 56 dogs (head or neck tumors were
not included in either study), Baker-Gabb and coworkers found that the most
significant risk factor for local recurrence was histologic tumor grade.
Fine-needle biopsy yielded correct MCT diagnosis in 96% of the cases
(histologic tumor grade can be expected to be consistent regardless of MCT
size and location). In this study, grade 3 tumors were significantly more
likely to be incompletely excised than grade 1 or 2 tumors; however, wide
margins were not significantly more likely to achieve complete removal of
grade 3 tumors, hence the authors' recommendation that the invasiveness of
surgery be decided on the basis of histologic or cytologic examination.

Not to mention the issue of seeding with sectional biopsy:

http://www.vetinfo4dogs.com/dmulticancer.html
"There is some evidence that certain tumors can be seeded to other
areas through fine needle aspirate or other biopsy techniques but I have
not seen much information about tumor potentiation or activation as a
result of biopsy. In general, the risk of seeding is pretty low with a fine
needle aspirate but has definitely been observed with surgical biopsy
techniques and with partial removal of tumors."

buglady
take out the dog before replying
hans - 24 Feb 2005 15:45 GMT
Original poster here....we don't know what it is yet.  The vet didn't
want to get in and find there was malignent growth requiring much more
surgery or amputation.  In those cases, she would refer us to a nearby
vet hospital.  Yes, two surgerys are required here.  The first is local
and gives us much more information.  A decision can then be made on the
second; another local or a trip to the hospital for much more radical
surgery.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.