Older dog house-breaking
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Jen A - 19 Oct 2005 02:48 GMT I have a Maltese that I just adopted, he is about 2 years old. I have had him for about 6 months now, and I have 2 others. For the past month or so it is like he "forgot " that he was trained. He has started going to the bathroom in the house. Sometimes even after we just took him out and he did his business outside! Any insight?
AtHisMastersFeet@MuchoMail.Com - 19 Oct 2005 03:15 GMT HOWEDY Jen A,
> I have a Maltese that I just adopted, You mean you bought IT from a "shelter / rescue" organization who GOT PAID to take IT in to find IT a new HOWES where ITS temperament and behavior problems could be MANAGED or IGNORED.
> he is about 2 years old. A dog is a dog, Jen A.
> I have had him for about 6 months now, and I > have 2 others. For the past month or so it is > like he "forgot " that he was trained. HOWEsbreaking is INSTINCTIVE at four weeks of age. There's ONLY TWO REASONS HOWE COME a dog would have HOWEsbreakin problems:
1. HE'S SICK.
OR
2. HE'S UNHAPPY.
> He has started going to the bathroom in the house. If he's UNHAPPY you can CURE THAT in WON DAY if you study and follow the INSTRUCTIONS in your own FREE COPY of The Amazing Puppy Wizard's 100% CONSISTENTLY NEARLY INSTANTLY SUCCESSFUL FREE WWW Wits' End Dog Training Method Manual:
<{#}: ~ } >8< { ~ :{@}> <{#}: ~ } > < { ~ :{@}> <{#}: ~ } > < { ~ :{@}> <{#}: ~ } > < { ~ :{@}> <{#}: ~ } > http://www.tinyurl.com/7bl5u < { ~ :{@}> <{#}: ~ } > < { ~ :{@}> <{#}: ~ } > < { ~ :{@}> <{#}: ~ } > < { ~ :{@}> <{#}: ~ } >8< { ~ :{@}>
http://www.irishdogs.ie/Information/Wits_End_Dog_Training.pdf
> Sometimes even after we just took him out > and he did his business outside! That's VERY COMMON amongst the dog lover's dogs you're askin for ADVICE, Jen A.
> Any insight? DECENT PEOPLE DO NOT POST HERE, Jen A.
Punishment Deranges Behavior. "NO!" Does NOT Have Any Behavioral Function EXCEPT To DERANGE Behaviors.
Here's professor dermer pryor:
From: Marshall Dermer (der...@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu) Subject: Re: Jerry's Dog Training Manual Date: 2001-07-12 06:49:13 PST
And how do we know this aspect of his advice is right?
Jerry is not God and his manual is not the Bible. His advice could be subject to an empirical analysis.
(Also, it is best to killfile posts from the few regulars here who are either ill-tempered, ill-mannered, or just plain ill.),
--Marshall
"At this point, "No" does not have any behavioral function. But, if you say "No,"pick up the puppy by its neck and shake it a bit, and the frequency of the biting decreases then you will have achieved too things.
First, the frequency of unwanted chewing has decreased; and two, you have established "No" as a conditioned punisher.
How much neck pulling and shaking? Just the minimum necessary to decrease the unwanted biting.
**********IS THAT A CONSISTENT 5 SECONDS?************
When our dog was a puppy, "No" came before mild forms of punishment (I would hold my dog's mouth closed for a few seconds.) whereas "Bad Dog" came before stronger punishement (the kind discussed above).
"No" is usually sufficient but sometimes I use "Bad Dog" to stop a behavior. "Bad Dog" ALWAYS works," marshall dermer, research professor of ANAL-ytic behaviorISM at UofWI. For MOORE animal abuse, please visit dr p.
BWAHAHAHHAHAAAA!!!!!
That's INSANE. Ain't it.
Here's professor dermer AFTER gettin JERRYIZED:
"We Are Lucky To Have You, And More People Should Come To Their Senses And Support Your Valuable Work. God Bless The Puppy Wizard," Professor Marshall Dermer, Dept Of ANAL-ytic Behavior, UofWI.
From: "Marshall Dermer" <der...@csd.uwm.edu> To: "The Puppy Wizard" <ThePuppyWiz...@earthlink.net> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 2:53 PM
Subject: God Bless The Puppy Wizard Dear Mr. Puppy Wizard,
I have, of late, come to recognize your genius and now must applaud your attempts to save animals from painful training procedures.
You are indeed a hero, a man of exceptional talent, who tirelessly devotes his days to crafting posts to alert the world to animal abuse.
We are lucky to have you, and more people should come to their senses and support your valuable work.
Have you thought of establishing a nonprofit charity to fund your important work? Have you thought about holding a press conference so others can learn of your highly worthwhile and significant work?
In closing, my only suggestion is that you try to keep your messages short for most readers may refuse to read a long message even if it is from the wise, heroic Puppy Wizard. I wish you well in your endeavors.
--Marshall Dermer
Subject: < BEFORE -> "Jerry, You filthy, Unctuous, No Good Charlatan,"
< AFTER -> "Thank You Jerry For Putting Up With A Constant Barrage Of Really Infantile Crap At The Hands Of Supposedly Adult Dog Lovers.
'Naive' Is Believing You Can Terrorize A Dog Into Good Behavior," Robert Crim.
>Subject: Re: Fritz---a retrospective >Date: 02/05/1999 [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > be in a jail cell right now for turning you into the pile > of sh.t you really are Hey, Howe, you really are a wacko, eh?
Crim wrote this about *YOU,* you insipid piece of cow dung!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! -- Dogman mailto:dog...@i1.net http://www.i1.net/~dogman
=====================
> On Thu, 17 Jun 1999 20:24:15 -0700, dogsnus <"Terri"@cyberhighway> Wrote:>
> Hey, do like me, and killfile Jerry. > He has millions of people aleady reading his posts and > watching him extract his soggy foot out of his mouth! > Out of these MILLIONS, I've only seen 2 naive childs > come forward and actually believe in his training manual. Robert Crim writes:
I assume that I and my wife are those two naive childs since I freely admit to having read and, I hope, understood enough of the manual and it's counterparts by John Fisher and the posts of Marilyn Rammell to believe and use it.
This naive child would like to say thank you to both Jerry and Marilyn for putting up with a constant barrage of really infantile crap at the hands of supposedly adult dog lovers.
The other naive child (LSW) has to put up with the nagging idea that if people like them had been posting earlier, maybe we would not have had to hold the head of a really magnificent animal in our arms while he was given the needle and having to hug him and wait until he gasped his last gasp.
To my mind, "naive" is believing you can terrorize a dog.
Naive is believing that people that hide behind fake names are more honest than people that use their real names. Naive is thinking that dilettante dog breeders and amateur "trainers" like Joey (lyingdogDUMMY, j.h.) are the equal or better than those that have studied and lived by their craft for decades.
"Stupid" is believing that people do not see kindergarten level insults for what they are. Really stupid is believing that people like Jerry Howe and Marilyn Rammell are going to just go away because you people act like fools.
Why do you act like fools? I really have no idea, and I don't really care.
> And, to date: I've not seen ONE come forward and > actually admit to buying and having success with his > little black box. I think I'm going to get one myself for Father's day and take it down to the Animal Shelter for their use and testing. You would never believe the results, so you'll never know.
> Anyone by now that doesn't see a scam man coming by > Jerry's posts deserves to get what is sure to be coming > to him! LOL! I don't see a "scam man", so I guess I and Longsuffering Wife and Rollei will just have to get what we deserve, eh? As Joey (Dogman) says, "poor Rollei.".......right.
>Terri Yes it was, and that is sad.
Robert, Longsuffering Wife and Rollei (do I get to listen to the box first?)
===========
Crim wrote THAT about *YOU,* tommy, "you insipid piece of cow dung!"
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
From: "George von Hilsheimer, Ph.D." <drv...@mindspring.com> To: "Jerry Howe" <theamazingpuppywiz...@mail.com> Subject: Alleged Professors of Animal Behavior Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:50:51 -0400
Dear Jerry, I paged through some of the "dog business" and was astonished at the low quality of opinions arising from professors of behavior analysis.
I had the very great privilege of meeting Sam Corson (Pavlov's last Ph.D. student) and his dogs at Ohio University. I even got to spend a night at Sam's house.
There is no question but that you are a spiritual brother to Corson and to Pavlov, both of whom knew that the dog's great capacity for love was the key to shaping doggie behavior.
Paradoxical reward and paradoxical fixing of attention are both well documented Pavlovian techniques. Even so humorless a chap as B.F. Skinner taught students like the Breland's whose "The Misbehavior of Organisms" demonstrate the utility of your methods and their deep roots in scientific (as opposed to commercial) psychology.
George von Hilsheimer, Ph.D., F.R.S.H. you may find my resume in Who's Who in Science and Technology
From: "The Puppy Wizard" <ThePuppyWiz...@EarthLink.Net> Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 17:26:31 GMT
Subject: Dr. George VonHilshimer Writes: "No Loving, No Learning."
HOWEDY People,
Perhaps the PROBLEM is "TOO MANY WORDS?"
From: "The Puppy Wizard" <ThePuppyWiz...@EarthLink.Net> To: "George von Hilsheimer, Ph.D." <drv...@mindspring.com> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 4:40 AM Subject: Fw: Counter Cruising must stop
> From: "diannes" <dian...@bolt.sonic.net> > Newsgroups: rec.pets.dogs.behavior [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > > > > then there must be a flaw in the philosophy > > > > > underlying that technique.
> > > > Ditto for dog training. No failure nor flaw of method > > > > is involved - that's just acceptance of reality.
> > > First of all, I didn't say that there was a flaw in the > > > method, though anyone is welcome to make that > > > leap.
> > > I said there was a flaw in the underlying philosophy > > > and its model of learning.
> > Correction accepted. I think that perhaps we are using > > terminology differently here. Here is my use of the terms: Jerry, I don't know where you find these folk who can't read.
> In order to use negative reinforcement, one must > typically administer the aversive stimulus in order > to be able to terminate it. This is not negative reinforcement. Negative means no.
Positive reinforcement = behavior emitted by dog, reward emitted immediately by trainer;
Negative reinforcement = behavior emitted by dog, no response by trainer;
Aversive reinforcement = behavior emitted by dog, aversive stimuli emitted immediately by trainer;
The term "reinforcement is used only tentatively with "aversion" because aversive stimuli (aka punishment) typically derange learning and are not followed by clean learning curves equivalent to those which follow reward or positive reinforcement;
Escape conditioning = dog has an aversive stimulus applied without any dog related reason and when behavior is emitted aversive stim is immediately turned off .
There is some indication that Escape Conditioning works in a manner closely approximating reward; but, ear pinch? -- too aversive.
I remind you that you should beat them over the head with "The Misbehavior of Organisms" by Breland and Breland, published in B.F. Skinner's CUMULATIVE RECORD. Ignored by most profs of psychology, but the distillation of his work.
NO PUNISHMENT.
Must pay attention to who is the animal?
His evolution, his development, and his personal history - cannot train without respect for who is the dog? So says the BIG TIME operant conditioning guru - and you can also refer back to MARY COVER JONES (mother of scientific systematic psychology), no loving, no learning.
I suppose I could wire up a dog so that his brain was badly interrupted and the loving method of puppy training might not work well - but it would still work better than the methods used by dominatrix and their ilk.
Lovingly applied ethological techniques like the one espoused by the Wizard of ALL puppies work for all dogs, for that matter for all mammals higher than cat.
Indeed, they will work for cats if trainer is warmly competent.
You can see this in Key West on any sunny day. Housecats performing quite happily.
Fondly, Dr. Von
From: TooCool (larrym...@hotmail.com) The Puppy Wizard's Wits End Training Method
I have studied canine behavior and dog training for years. I have a huge library that covers every system of training.
The Puppy Wizard's (Jerry Howe's) Wits' End Training Method is by far the most scientific, the most advanced, the kindest, the quickest and the most effective training method yet discovered.
It is not an assortment of training tips and tricks; it is a logically consistent system. Every behavior problem and every obedience skill is treated in the same logically consistent manner.
Please study his manual carefully. Please endeavor to understand the basis of his system and please follow his directions exactly. His manual is a masterpiece. It is dense with theory, with explanation, with detailed descriptions about why behavior problems occur and how their solution should be approached.
One should not pick and choose from among his methods based upon what you personally like or dislike. His is not a bag of tricks but a complete and integrated system for not only training a dog but for raising a loving companion.
When I once said to Jerry that his system creates for you the dog of your dreams, his response was that it produces for your dog the owner of his dreams.
You see, Jerry has discovered that if you are gentle with your dog then he will be gentle with you, if you praise your dog every time he looks at you, then you will become the center of your dogs world, if you use Jerry's sound distraction with praise, then it takes just minutes-sometimes merely seconds-to train your dog to not misbehave (even in your absence) (Just 15 seconds this morning to train my 10 week old puppy to lie quietly and let me clip his nails).
Using Jerry's scientific method (sound distraction / praise / alteration / variation) it takes just minutes to train you dog to respond to your commands.
What a pleasure it was for me to see my 6 week old puppy running as fast has his wobbly little legs would carry him in response to my recall command-and he comes running every time I call no matter where we are or what he is doing.
At ten weeks old now, my puppy never strains upon his leash thanks to Jerry's hot & cold exercises and his Family Pack Leadership exercises.
Jerry has discovered that if you scold your dog, if you scream at him, if you intimidate him, if you hurt him, if you force him then his natural response is to oppose you.
Is Jerry a nut?
It doesn't make any difference to me whether he is or not. It is a logical fallacy to judge a person's ideas based upon their personality. As far as dogs are concerned, Jerry wears his heart upon his sleeve. It touches him deeply when he hears of trainers forcing, intimidating, scolding or hurting dogs.
More than that, he knows that force is not effective and that it will certainly lead to behavior problems; sometime problems so severe that people put their dogs down because of those problems.
I believe that it is natural for humans to want to control their dog by force. Jerry knows this too. We have all been at our wits' end, haven't we?
Dogs have a natural tendency to mimic. In scientific literature it is referred to allelomimetic behavior. Dogs respond in like kind to force; they respond in like kind to praise.
Don't bribe your dog with treats; give him what he wants most-your kind attention. Give him your praise. You will be astonished at how your dog 's anxiety will dissipate and how their behavior problems will dissipate along with their anxiety.
Treat Jerry Howe's (The Puppy Wizard) Wits' End Training Method as a scientific principle just as you would the law of gravity and you will have astounding success.
Dog behavior is just as scientific as is gravity.
If you follow Jerry's puppy rules you will get a sweet little Magwai; if you don't you will surely get a little gremlin (anyone see The Gremlins?). --Larry
From: Mike (m.bidd...@ns.sympatico.ca) Subject: Re: Info. on the puppy wizard? Date: 2004-07-18 14:27:02 PST
> > Oh, and did I mention his methods work, ya nuff said. > > Mike > Ok Mike which part worked for you? It helped clear problems from my dogs in the field using the can penny distraction technique.
Works like a charm.
My dogs get distracted easy from their jobs ie, retrieving or training to find lost people, oh did I mention that I am a Search and Rescue Team Leader.
Sorry that slipped my mind.
I have read volumes of training books and don't know where people get that Jerry copied others work as I have NEVER come across his methods before. I would like to see proof.
Just like Jerry outlined I eliminated problems one at at time as they arose. I used to try and train to the way I wanted them but this is backward, you train out the problems leaving what you want left over.
Funny part is the second dog who had the same problems as the other didn't need correcting for some of his habits after I cleared it from the first dog.
Seemed he learned through osmosis.
Nice side benefit there.
It nearly came to giving them up to a 3rd party trainer as they were not performing well. The VAST majority of working dog trainers are agressive in their actions with the dogs.
I tried it and it didn't work and guess what I was at my "Whits End" then someone I new turned me onto Jerry and the rest is history.
I referred friends and families to Jerry's manual and all have had great results. Starting puppies out on the distraction technique is especially good because they never develop the habit.
I had my sisters dog healing, sitting and down stay reliably at 8-9 weeks. The first night home following Jerrys advice we ditched the crate and put the pup on the floor beside the bed and after 2 whimpers NOT A SOUND OUT OF THAT DOG FOR 6 HRS! first night, that has never happened in all my days.
Sorry, the man understands dogs its that simple.
Mike
"Ama...@DCFWatch.com" wrote:
No, the dog learned that I would hold still the second she began to pull. She would pull to go where *she* wanted.
Well if she wanted to stop and go in another direction.. say to sniff my neighbors yard..
she learned if she wanted to do it I would stop walking and she could go.. and if there wasn't enough slack on her lead she would just pull me.
Then when she got done doing *her* thing, she woudl heel.. smile at me and wait for me to say "let's go" and finish *my* thing. I would refuse to move .. i looked like an idiot.. freezing mid walk for minutes waiting for *my* dog to heel and give *me* permission to go again.
I did the treats and the let's go... she got to do her stuff and get a cookie.. if she even wanted the cookie.
I wound up calling Jerry.. as I have a half red nose pit and half amstaff.. who is incredibly protective..
we had a new pup on the way.. and i needed help.. i followed petsmarts trainnign guides.. memorized them... and they *did* work, don't get me wrong.. but only when my pet wanted a cookie or felt the cookie was better than what she wanted.. which was not often.
She quickly learned to ignore my commands if she could see my hands were empty. So I called Jerry... he chatted me for about an hour and a half.. gave me his link... and even when i had probs intro'ing the pup he called me withn i5 mins of my email for help at 10pm on a sunday night.
One.. singular.. uno family pack exercise after the hot and cold exercise and i could zig zag down my street.. about face .. whatever.. and never had tension.
two men were acrossed the street and she walked right by them... ordinarily she'd snarl and protect us.
And in two days.. my dog.. who bit the puppy if he even looked like he was going near my husband or kids.. is nursing him every hour.. cleaning him.. rough housing gently.. and teaching him to go potty outside..
actually watches him to make sure he doesn't go in the house... and has milk.. which is awesome since she's 19 months old and has never had a litter.
She also has stopped barking non stop at our neighbor's dogs and pig.. does not bark at eveyr car that drives by and has stopped jumping on people. she's even starting to ignore our cat who has lived on her dome litter box and our window sill (literally) for over a year and a half.
She also does her commands on cue.. and doesn't look for a treat.
From: "George von Hilsheimer, Ph.D." <drv...@mindspring.com> Subject: The Amazing Jerry's take on psychobabble Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:13:44 -0400
You might improve the learning of folk who actually live with and train dogs to do useful things if you excluded everyone who uses psychobabble from your lists.
I recommend to all of you who wish to taste the flavor of sensible animal behaviorists to read THE MISBEHAVIOR OF ORGANISMS, Breland and Breland.
This married pair of psychologists began the long trail of highly trained animals who are symbolized by Shamu eating a mackrel from a girl's hand instead of eating the much more tasty pretty girl who is exactly the size of the natural food of killer whales, seals. Yum!
The essay, by the way, is a chapter in B.F. Skinner's summing up book, CUMULATIVE RECORD. They include a sentence which more or less says, "unless you understand the personal history of the particular animal, and the history of this animal's species and group, the developmental history of the animal, you cannot effectively train the animal.
Pigs root and hen's scratch, if you try to train hens without scratching or pigs without scratching or pigeons without pecking, you aren't going to have much success.
A conditional reflex is one which is learned, the original primitive reflex occurs no matter what the history of the animal, and is hard wired. If you train the animal to respond, say by ringing a bell immediately before turning on a bright light, then you've taught the animal and made his native reflex of pupil constriction conditional upon the ringing of a bell.
Thorndyke added some terminology to this kind of training and insisted that when you train the animal to make gross motor responses that this learning is "instrumental", the animal takes action and uses an instrument.
The Russian word translated as "conditional" in all other contexts was mistranslated by Pavlov's American translator, Horsley Gannt, as "conditioned" and so American psychology went haring after phantasmagora.
The major theorists for the development of the language of operant conditioning are Edward Thorndike, John Watson, and B. F. Skinner. Their approach to behaviorism played a major role in the development of American psychology.
They proposed that learning is the result of the application of consequences; that is, learners begin to connect certain responses with certain stimuli. This connection causes the probability of the response to change (i.e., learning occurs.)
Thorndike labeled this type of learning instrumental. Using consequences, he taught kittens to manipulate a latch (e.g., an instrument). Skinner renamed instrumental as "operant" because in this learning, one is "operating" on, and is influenced by, the environment. Where classical conditioning illustrates S-->R learning, operant conditioning is often viewed as R-->S learning since it is the consequence that follows the response that influences whether the response is likely or unlikely to occur again.
It is through operant conditioning that voluntary responses are learned.
One should note that Russian Psychology did very well without the operant language, and only pettifogging university professors ought to worry about what kind of label we attach to the learning. Pfui!
Even Skinner understood this!
And please note if you saw the original movie, THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE, you saw a Chinese psychologist who was based on Andrew Salter, CONDITIONED REFLEX THERAPY.
Alas, Salter didn't have a Ph.D., but he basically rescued us from the long Freudian nightmare and returned psychotherapy to a scientific basis. Alas, the 2nd movie didn't even cite Salter as a source. "...all the highest nervous activity, as it manifests itself in the conditional reflex, consists of a continual change of these three fundamental processes -- excitation, inhibition and disinhibition." Ivan P. Pavlov
George von Hilsheimer, Ph.D., F.R.S.H.
What's important is, "does Shamu reliably eat the fish and not the pretty girl?"
George von Hilsheimer, Ph.D., F.R.
From: "George von Hilsheimer, Ph.D." <drv...@mindspring.com To: <d...@arcane-computing.com Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 5:38 PM Subject: Doggy advice
Scott, Jerry Howe forwarded me the letter below. I'm glad that you referred negatively to Jerry's habit of CAPITALIZING and HOWEING everything.
I personally hate this habit of his. I think it is his way of diluting his authority - IME he is a very modest fellow. However, contrary to your sneer, he is very competent at living with dogs.
I thought I'd list a series of actions which I found on the list, folk asking advice on what to do about dogs doing this and that, for example:
whining, humping, hunching, pacing, self mutilation - paw licking, side sucking, spinning, prolonged barking, barking at shadows, overstimulated barking, fighting, bullying other dogs, compulsive digging, compulsive scratching, compulsive chewing, frantic behavior, chasing light, chasing shadow, stealing food, digging in garbage can, loosing house (toilet) training. inappropriate fearfulness aggression.
The thing that is fascinating to me, as an ethologist who graduated from college 50 years ago and has spent all of the intervening time working with animals (including the human animal), is that you never see any of these behaviors in wild dingoes, jackals, coyotes or wolves, you don't even see these behaviors in hyenas (who aren't dog related).
You see these behaviors in human managed animals, especially animals who live with neurotic hysterical humans.
As Sam Corson (Pavlov's last student) demonstrated for nearly 50 years at Ohio University (Oxford, O.) there is no treatment more useful for dogs than tender loving care.
George von Hilsheimer, Ph. D., F. R. S. H., Diplomate, Academy of Behavioral Medicine
"Linda" <llindaleedan...@msn.com wrote in message news:
I have been trying for the last 18 months to help my dog who became fear aggressive at 18 month of age. I do not know what started the problem but he came aggressive first with dogs and then began lunging and snapping at people. Until this time he loved everyone and could play with any dog. He was well socialized ad I took him with me everywhere.
At 13 months he passed the Canine Good Citizens Test except he could let me leave him. I had used clicker training to teach him manners and tricks but it was not working on his aggression problem.
I took him to vets who suggested a low protein diet, trainers who charged $800 to only make him worse. They tried to use a prong collar and he froze, urinated and tried to climb on my head to help him. they then suggested a shock collar I knew this approach was not working as he was becoming more aggressive.
I took him to an animal behaviorist with Ph. D. 400 miles away who told me to "KEEP HIM SAFE" and read a book on the fearful canine. I tried another trainer who tried to use a nylon chock collar but it only made him worse.
I read hundreds of books,"CULTURE CLASH", "DOG ARE FROM NEPTUNE", "THE OTHER END OF THE LEASH", ETC looking for help. We finally went to Purdue University Small Animal Behavior Clinic and they said he had fear aggression, punishment would not work, use the gentle leader and when out walking and he got stressed have the people stop until he could get in control using treats, and work on clicker training.
At that point I knew more about clicker training and using the gentle leader than they did! Nothing was working--he would not come when I called him and would run away when I tried to catch him. I was afraid to walk him even in the neighborhood as we had become that "mean dog and women who hasn't trained her dog"
I went to four trainers in both Michigan and Florida who were trainer/specialists in aggression and the last two were so afraid of him they could not approach him. No one said I should give up on him and kill him but they would say "You have to realize he is dangerous and you are responsible for him."
*(You got LUCKY, Linda... They coulda got Sunshine DEAD on us. Damned near did... too.)
As last resort I tried the internet again--I had had on going discussions with trainers from Triple Crown and Dr Meister with out any help-and I found the ad to Doggy Do Right and messaged Jerry to ask if this might help my dog. He said solving the aggression problem was EZ but I could not believe him even when I downloaded the manual.
The name of the method was right I was at my Wits End. I had been working for 18 months!
Using the can sound three time he came, and still comes from anywhere with the command-"comegoodboy" Next I tried the can when walking him--when he saw a dog three blocks away he went off-lunging and snapping-I used the can sound and he looked at me like uhn?
I used it three more times and we got to the other dog- -the looked at me wagging his tail--the other person looked at me like why are shaking that can but just walked on by.
When ever I try to explain about the sound people look at me like "you must be out of your mind"
The results can make a believer!!!
Three weeks since beginning the Wits End Training Manual program I walked him without the gentle leader in a busy shopping area with many dogs.
He just seemed to not notice any one.
When people talked to him or ask his name he would look at then and wag his tail and let then pet him.
I still can not believe the change in him--we can now enjoy life out in public.
If I had not found the Wits End method I know there was no hope for him and he would have hurt someone Through all this he never growled at me, guarded his toys or food or showed any sign of aggression with me.
My goal is to get the message out to all dog lovers that dogs can be trained fast, easily and problems solved with out force, pain, food or anything but sound and praise!!!!
I know most people would have given up on him a long time ago but he was and is my life. Solving the problem was EZ but only with the right approach-sound and praise.
I know because I tried everything else and nothing worked!!!
================================
From: Linda Daniel To: Jerry Howe Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 1:06 AM Subject: Re: - Re: dog aggression
Thanks for writing--I would be happy to do almost anything to get your approach out to dog owners as I know it would save so many lives. I know at times I was so frustrated I thought of giving up on Sunshine but of course I never would have but many people would have. The world just does not know you can train a dog in just a few sessions and actually solve problems.
We will be here until late April and we really have no plans- -just to enjoy the warmth and sun of Florida, so any time you could meet us would be great. I drive so I would be happy to come to you anytime anywhere!
We went to Celebration today and two little poodles got right into his face and he just sat there--I GOT a little scared but he handled it just fine.--a couple of times people would ask his name and want to pet him and he just went to them tail wagging and rolled over for them rub his tummy.
He really just is not concerned about people passing, even those on rollerblades! I have always used a gentle leader in public but he spent most of time rubbing his face on the grass--today I used his collar and he was so much happier!!
Only problem is he will stop to smell and I can not get stopped soon enough to keep the leash loose. He never pulled ahead of me but when he gets into smelling I have a hard time getting him going--at times I think he could smell a blade of grass for 10 minutes.
I can never thank you enough for giving Sunshine back!!!!!
I wrote to Purdue and told them about him being able to walk in a crowd with out the /gentle leader and not having a problem with other people and dogs.
I told them their advice did not work. Their advice was to use the gentle leader at all times and when he was around people or dogs to have him sit and reward with treats--one really good suggestions was to have people coming toward us stop when he got stressed or aroused and not move until we backed away-
- can you just see me yelling at people to stop on the street until I get his attention with treats.
They also suggested the possibility of using drugs-prozac- but thought he was too dangerous as the drug would make him less fearful and then he might attack or become more sure of himself and become dominate aggressive. Just had to share their great advice with you but I am sure you have heard it all--even I am becoming an expert on bad advice.
----------------------------------
("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._ `6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`) (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-' _..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' ,' (((' (((-((('' ((((
|\ _.-'~~""'~`'~) /, ~-,__,,,.'~ ,-;;--'' |,4) ./ ' ; ;/' '-~~;'@ ( ; ; _.--'' _.-_..' .;.' (,_..----''' (,..--''
Meow
/),,/) ( ' ; ') (,,)-(,,)
/),,/) (' ; ') kiss me (,,)-(,,)
/),,/) ( ; ' ) kiss me here (,,)-(,,)
/),,/) ( ; ) kiss me here (,,)-(,,)
/) ( * ) and KISS ME HERE! (,,)-(,,) The Amazing Pussy Wizard <{@); ~ } >
<{#}: ~ } >8< { ~ :{@}> <{#}: ~ } > < { ~ :{@}> <{#}: ~ } > < { ~ :{@}> <{#}: ~ } > < { ~ :{@}> <{#}: ~ } > http://www.tinyurl.com/7bl5u < { ~ :{@}> <{#}: ~ } > < { ~ :{@}> <{#}: ~ } > < { ~ :{@}> <{#}: ~ } > < { ~ :{@}> <{#}: ~ } >8< { ~ :{@}>
http://www.irishdogs.ie/Information/Wits_End_Dog_Training.pdf
Please DON'T BE The Amazing Pussy Wizard's PREY.
IT AIN'T PRETTY.
<{@); ~ } >
Jen A - 19 Oct 2005 03:39 GMT Well I didn't get him from a rescue. I got him from an older couple who were not home a lot and did not feel they spent enough time with him. He is not sick, and has been fine for 6 months now. Nothing has changed in the household, so I am not really sure he is all that unhappy
> I have a Maltese that I just adopted, he is about 2 years old. I have had > him for about 6 months now, and I have 2 others. For the past month or so > it is like he "forgot " that he was trained. He has started going to the > bathroom in the house. Sometimes even after we just took him out and he did > his business outside! Any insight? IHateToSayItButITOLDYOUSO@Inbox.Com - 19 Oct 2005 06:20 GMT HOWEDY Jen A,
> Well I didn't get him from a rescue. Good, cause most of the "rescues" only DISADVANTAGE dogs and their owners due to a lack of INFORMATION.
> I got him from an older couple who were not home a > lot and did not feel they spent enough time with him. Oh, so you bypassed the middle man.
> He is not sick, Of curse not.
> and has been fine for 6 months now. And NHOWE he AIN'T.
> Nothing has changed in the household, Right.
> so I am not really sure he is all that unhappy Well then, he's probably not shittin in your HOWES either.
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:41:01 -0500 From: "George von Hilsheimer, Ph.D." <drv...@mindspring.com> Subject: "time-out"
Dan, my own firm hatred of punishment has recently been intensified by meeting The Puppy Wizard, Jerry Howe, whose work with dogs is marvelous.
There is a literature on harms caused by time out, and perhaps you'd like to look at http://www.dogydoright.com George von Hilsheimer, Ph.D., F.R.S.H.
"As Sam Corson (Pavlov's last student) demonstrated for nearly 50 years at Ohio University (Oxford, O.) there is no treatment more useful for dogs than tender loving care."
George von Hilsheimer, Ph. D., F. R. S. H., Diplomate, Academy of Behavioral Medicine
From: "George von Hilsheimer, Ph.D." <drv...@mindspring.com To: <d...@arcane-computing.com Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 5:38 PM Subject: Doggy advice
Scott, Jerry Howe forwarded me the letter below. I'm glad that you referred negatively to Jerry's habit of CAPITALIZING and HOWEING everything.
I personally hate this habit of his. I think it is his way of diluting his authority - IME he is a very modest fellow. However, contrary to your sneer, he is very competent at living with dogs.
I thought I'd list a series of actions which I found on the list, folk asking advice on what to do about dogs doing this and that, for example:
whining, humping, hunching, pacing, self mutilation - paw licking, side sucking, spinning, prolonged barking, barking at shadows, overstimulated barking, fighting, bullying other dogs, compulsive digging, compulsive scratching, compulsive chewing, frantic behavior, chasing light, chasing shadow, stealing food, digging in garbage can, loosing house (toilet) training. inappropriate fearfulness aggression.
The thing that is fascinating to me, as an ethologist who graduated from college 50 years ago and has spent all of the intervening time working with animals (including the human animal), is that you never see any of these behaviors in wild dingoes, jackals, coyotes or wolves, you don't even see these behaviors in hyenas (who aren't dog related).
You see these behaviors in human managed animals, especially animals who live with neurotic hysterical humans.
As Sam Corson (Pavlov's last student) demonstrated for nearly 50 years at Ohio University (Oxford, O.) there is no treatment more useful for dogs than tender loving care.
George von Hilsheimer, Ph. D., F. R. S. H., Diplomate, Academy of Behavioral Medicine
Koehler On Correcting The Housebreaking Backslider.
"If the punishment is not severe enough, some of these "backsliders" will think they're winning and will continue to mess in the house. An indelible impression can sometimes be made by giving the dog a hard spanking of long duration, then leaving him tied by the mess he's made so you can come back at twenty minute intervals and punish him again for the same thing. (Dogs are REALLY stupid. J.H.)
In most cases, the dog that deliberately does this disagreeable thing cannot be made reliable by the light spanking that some owners seem to think is adequate punishment. It will be better for your dog, as well as the house, if you really pour it on him."
"Housebreaking Problems:
"The Koehler Method of Dog Training" Howell Book House, 1996"
Occasionally, there is a pup who seems determined to relieve himself inside the house, regardless of how often he has the opportunity to go outside. This dog may require punishment. Make certain he is equipped with a collar and piece of line so he can't avoid correction.
When you discover a mess, move in fast, take him to the place of his error, and hold his head close enough so that he associates his error with the punishment. Punish him by spanking him with a light strap or switch. Either one is better than a folded newspaper.
It is important to your future relationship that you do not rush at him and start swinging before you get hold of him.
When he's been spanked, take him outside. Chances are, if you are careful in your feeding and close observation, you will not have to do much punishing.
Be consistent in your handling.
To have a pup almost house-broken and then force him to commit an error by not providing an opportunity to go outside is very unfair. Careful planning will make your job easier.
The same general techniques of housebreaking apply to grown dogs that are inexperienced in the house.
For the grown dog who was reliable in the house and then backslides, the method of correction differs somewhat. In this group of "backsliders" we have the "revenge piddler." This dog protests being alone by messing on the floor and often in the middle of a bed.
The first step of correction is to confine the dog closely in a part of the house when you go away, so that he is constantly reminded of his obligation. The fact that he once was reliable in the house is proof that the dog knows right from wrong, and it leaves you no other course than to punish him sufficiently to convince him that the satisfaction of his wrongdoing is not worth the consequences. If the punishment is not severe enough, some of these "backsliders" will think they're winning and will continue to mess in the house.
An indelible impression can sometimes be made by giving the dog a hard spanking of long duration, then leaving him tied by the mess he's made so you can come back at twenty minute intervals and punish him again for the same thing.
In most cases, the dog that deliberately does this disagreeable thing cannot be made reliable by the light spanking that some owners seem to think is adequate punishment.
It will be better for your dog, as well as the house, if you really pour it on him.
"Handsome Jack Morrison" <handsomemorri...@thedetonatorearthlink.net> wrote in <message news:a236iv0ngp58gv9jmi818kbmk928rjcokq@4ax.com... > On 26 Jul 2003 22:14:29 GMT, dogstar...@aol.com > (DogStar716) wrote: > > >>>Never mind dogman :) > >> > >>You too? Some folks just never learn. > > > >Uh huh :) > > One of the signs of mental illness is to say "Uh > huh" a lot. > > >>PS: If the "trainer" you were talking about isn't > >>on this list, he (or she) is NOT an approved > >>Koehler trainer, no matter how loud you scream > >>otherwise. > > > >May I laugh again? LOL! One doesn't need to be on > >a list to use Koehlers methods or teach his > >methods. > > Let me be among the first (apparently) to tell you > that not every trainer who uses a leash is a > *Koehler* trainer. > > Sheesh. > > This person may call herself a Koehler trainer, but > if she's hanging 12 week old puppies, she's about as > far from a Koehler trainer as a dog trainer can > possibly be. > > Again, this is just your IGNORANCE showing. > > I can call myself a devout Christian, but if I'm not > adhering to the doctrine, I'm something else. > > >>http://www.koehlerdogtraining.com/patoflearn.html > >Sorry, the very first sentences make me aware that > >whoever wrote it knows nothing about PR based > >training: > > > >"Amidst the current (and politically correct) trend > >in Positive Reinforcement Only training systems" > > > >You cannot use PR only. > > Au contraire. Many, many posters to r.p.d.b. (and > many other places as well) *claim* that they use > nothing but R. You know, the PPers. > > And they do it quite loudly, too. > > Surely you aren't blind (and deaf), as well as > ignorant? > > Those are hard handicaps to overcome, Dogstar. > > >And if you knew anything about PR BASED training, > >you would realize that. It's not all cookies and > >babytalk. > > There is no stronger supporter of R than Handsome > Jack Morrison, but I also use every behavioral tool > in my bag, including R-, P, and P-, because I know > that even R has its limits. > > You'd know that too, if you didn't have your head in > the sand. > > > But that seems to be the battle cry of the > > Koehler-ites. > > The Koehlerites have no battle cry. > > They have behaviorism on their side, and that's more > than enough. > > >I don't need instruction on how to give my dogs a > >proper leash correction as I do not rely on a leash > >to control or teach my dog. > > That may or may not be suitable for your needs, but > it's not suitable for the majority of dog owners, > especially since the advent of leash laws. > > Besides, after just a few weeks of proper Koehler > training, Koehler dogs likewise are no longer in > need of a leash. > > That you apparently don't know that, once again > shows me just how ignorant of anything to do with > Koehler you are. > > >My last two dogs have been trained offleash right > >from the start, using rewards for what I like, and > >nothing for what I don't like. > > Good for you, and if that level of training is good > enough for you, fine. But it's not good enough for > many of the rest of us. > > >Again, I'm not saying Koehler doesn't work. > > I really have no idea what you're saying anymore, > because you apparently know so damn little about > Koehler and behavioral principles in general that > it's hard to have an informed discussion with you. > > PS: It boggles my mind at how stupid you must be to > keep denying that those certain harsh methods are > only for LAST RESORT situations, intended only to > SAVE A DOG'S LIFE, even after I've repeatedly given > you direct *quotes* from Koehler's book saying just > that. It's like you don't even care how stupid > people think you are, or how devious you are, etc. > That can't help your cause any. You'd think that > you'd at least want to *appear* to be honest, even > if you're not. -- Handsome Jack Morrison *gently > remove the detonator to reply via e-mail
"Handsome Jack Morrison" <handsomemorri...@thedetonatorearthlink.net> wrote in <message news:spb3ivgh7prvq9omhka0bcif0tfknv6oop@4ax.com... > On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 17:52:18 -0400, "Krishur" > <kris_br...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Good books huh? > > Absolutely. Some are, in fact, classics. > > >Which idea was your favorite, the one where they > >tell you to alpha roll a "dominant" dog, > > There's nothing inherently wrong with rolling a dog > (i.e., it *can* and *does* work in *some* > situations). Unfortunately, most people either do it > incorrectly, do it at the wrong time, etc. > > >or where they tell you that you didn't hit him hard > >enough if he doesn't yelp or approaches you within > >5 minutes of his punishment? > > If physical discipline is deemed necessary (after > careful evaluation), it's much more cruel not to get > it over with quickly than it is to do it > incrementally and half-heartedly, which usually only > invites the need for even more discipline. > > >Maybe you liked when they recommend these beatings > >for housebreaking accidents, chewing/destructive > >behavior, stealing, trying to get on your bed > >at night and dog on dog aggression. > > At no time do the Monks *ever* advocate beating a > dog. A swat on the rump or a check to the chin does > *not* constitute a "beating." > > I'm sorry if you don't agree. > > And each of those behavior "problems" needs to be > looked at in its proper context. > > A quote from the Monks: > > "We repeat, these situations may merit physical > discipline. Since no book can pretend to analyze > every individual dog and situation, we feel > obligated to emphasize from the outset that > discipline is never an arbitrary training > technique to be applied to each and every dog for > all offenses. We do, however, believe that physical > and verbal discipline can be an effective technique. > The best policy if you experience any of the above > problems is to consult a qualified trainer or > veterinarian for evaluation of your individual > situation.... > > "If discipline is decided upon as a training > technique, it should be the proper technique. We > feel we have developed several methods that depend > less on violent physical force than timing, a flair > for drama, and the element of surprise. > We feel an obligation, as responsible trainers, to > map out > these methods, rather than simply skip the topic > because it is unpleasant. Dog owners want to know > what to do." > > In other words, physical discipline is reserved for > those serious, special occasions when other methods > have failed. > > For example, they do not recommend using physical > discipline for *routine* housebreaking chores -- > only on those rare occasions when an already > reliably housebroken dog is (after careful > evaluation) deemed to be soiling the house on > purpose, backsliding, etc. > > I'll give you an actual example. Years ago, an > adult dog was brought to me as an *incurable* > house-soiler. It was either get the dog reliably > housetrained or the dog was going on a one way trip > to the pound. Being the kind, compassionate trainer > that I am, I was prepared to do whatever it took to > get this dog house-trained and save his life. > > After several weeks of more or less traditional > training, and to poor result, I brought out the big > guns -- physical and verbal discipline. Whenever the > dog soiled the house (no, you don't even have to > catch him in the act), I immediately (but very > calmly) tossed a leash on his collar, dragged him to > the scene of the crime, and (using a large > chair as a prop) tethered him to the leg of the > chair, with his nose about two inches away from the > poop. After a couple of swats on the rump, some > loud vocalizing, and a wait of about 20 minutes, I'd > release the dog and then ignore him for a while. I > had to repeat this process *three* times, I think -- > and the house-soiling miraculously stopped. The dog > went home to enjoy a long and contented life with > his original owners, and I got to feel good about > myself. > > So, yes, the Monk's books are good ones. Even for > novices. > > Yup, that's my opinion, and I'm sticking to it. > > -- Handsome Jack Morrison *gently remove the > detonator to reply via e-mail
Spot - 19 Oct 2005 23:20 GMT Jen
Sometimes you just have to start over again with housebreaking. I would go right back to training him just like he was a new dog in the house. This means no unsupervised time, keep him by your side teather him to you if need be, out the door at frequent intervals and lots of treats & love when he does right.
I had to do the same thing with Lady who we thought had the hang of it all after 4 months but then started leaving messes. After the 2nd round of house breaking I feel she completely has the hang of it because now she comes and gets me no matter what I'm doing when she has to go out.
PS...........ignore the nutcase he's so far out there that most everyone just killfiles him.
Celeste
>I have a Maltese that I just adopted, he is about 2 years old. I have had > him for about 6 months now, and I have 2 others. For the past month or so > it is like he "forgot " that he was trained. He has started going to the > bathroom in the house. Sometimes even after we just took him out and he > did > his business outside! Any insight?
|
|
|