Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Mammals
FerretsGuinea PigsHamstersRabbitsRats
Aquaria
GeneralMarine ReefFreshwaterPlantsCichlidsGoldfish
Birds
BirdsParrots
Miscellaneous
Animal HealthPet Loss
PetKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Pet Forum / Miscellaneous / Animal Health / December 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Reasons to neuter

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
xlookinnyx@yahoo.com - 16 Dec 2005 00:01 GMT
Hello all,
My Girlfriend has a 6 month old puppy. I hate the thought of getting
him "fixed".
I guess its a male thing but I also cant see him being happy about it
either. I have heard that it is better for them in some way and helps
them to live longer.
How beneficial is this for a male dog? Are the health benefits extreme
or marginal? Are we talking about "he MIGHT be less susceptible to
certain problems"?
Behavior issues if he is not fixed as opposed to fixed?
This dog will not be getting out and creating unwanted puppies so that
is not a good reason in this case.
Any help would be appreciated.
josh - 16 Dec 2005 15:25 GMT
> How beneficial is this for a male dog? Are the health benefits extreme
> or marginal? Are we talking about "he MIGHT be less susceptible to
> certain problems"?

He will be less susceptible to certain forms of cancer.  Obviously, he'll
never get testicular cancer.  He'll also not get benign prostate
hyperplasia, which would necessitate neutering him.  He'd also be less
likely to get prostatitis and prostatic abcesses.

> Behavior issues if he is not fixed as opposed to fixed?

That's less easy to answer.  On the whole, dogs who are neutered tend to be
calmer, don't hump things, and don't lose thier minds when they smell a
female in heat.  However, the longer you wait to neuter him, the more likely
he'll associate some of these behaviors with being a dog rather than being a
sexually intact dog.

> This dog will not be getting out and creating unwanted puppies so that
> is not a good reason in this case.

Ha ha.  Yeah, right.  I'm gonna guess you've never been around an intact
male who knows there's a female in heat around.  They'll chew through walls.
Getting out, creating unwanted puppies, and being turned into road pizza is
a GREAT reason to neuter a dog.  People who own unneutered males should go
ahead and set aside $3000 for health care.  If you don't use it for surgery
and radiation for the cancer, you'll need it to put his legs and/or pelvis
back together after the car hits him.
IHateToSayItButITOLDYOUSO@Inbox.Com - 20 Dec 2005 01:36 GMT
HOWEDY josh,

Ain't you finished vet school yet?

> > How beneficial is this for a male dog? Are the health benefits extreme
> > or marginal? Are we talking about "he MIGHT be less susceptible to
> > certain problems"?
>
> He will be less susceptible to certain forms of cancer.

You mean testicle cancer, josh?

>  Obviously, he'll never get testicular cancer.

SHAAAZZZAAAMMM? Is that what they taught you in vet school?

> He'll also not get benign prostate hyperplasia, which
> would necessitate neutering him.  He'd also be less
> likely to get prostatitis and prostatic abcesses.

That's a load of crap, josh:

"The interval between castration and onset of prostatic
problems was highly variable, suggesting that castration
does not initiate the development of PCA in the dog, but
it does favour tumor progression."

 "COMMENTARY: This article supports previous studies
 showing BPH as the most common prostate disease in
 dogs; that prostate carcinoma is relatively rare; and that
 the prevalence of prostate carcinoma is higher in castrated
 dogs than in intact dogs.

The age of castration had no effect on the age at
which the tumor was diagnosed. Because prostate
carcinoma is so rare in both intact and neutered dogs,
this should not be a deterrent to castration.

 Prostate carcinoma is seen only in dogs older
 than 6 years. When prostate disease is diagnosed
 in castrated dogs, the probability of cancer is very
 high. - David F. Senior, BVSc, Diplomate ACVIM &
 ECVIM"
          ---------------------------

> > Behavior issues if he is not fixed as opposed to fixed?
>
> That's less easy to answer.

You mean on accHOWENT of surgical sexual mutilation HAS
NO BENEFICIAL EFFECT on behavior and IN FACT CAUSES
PHOBIAS and AGGRESSION, josh.

>  On the whole, dogs who are neutered tend to be calmer,

CITES PLEASE?

> don't hump things,

Humping is an anXXXIHOWESNESS RELIEF MECHANISM
not a result of testosterone or testicles, josh.

> and don't lose thier minds when they smell a female in heat.

THAT'S A TRAINING PROBLEM, josh.

>  However, the longer you wait to neuter him, the more likely
> he'll associate some of these behaviors with being a dog
> rather than being a sexually intact dog.

THAT'S ABSURD.

> > This dog will not be getting out and creating unwanted puppies
> > so that is not a good reason in this case.
>
> Ha ha.  Yeah, right.

Dogs are INSTINCTIVELY TERRORTORIAL CREATURES, josh.
Neutering dogs got NO EFFECT on "roaming" or ESCAPE behaviors
CAUSED BY MISHANDLING, josh.

>  I'm gonna guess you've never been around an intact male

Perhaps it's YOU who's never been arHOWEND intact males, josh?

> who knows there's a female in heat around.

That's IRRELEVENT, josh.

> They'll chew through walls.

ONLY if they're MISHANDLED, josh.

>  Getting out, creating unwanted puppies, and being turned
>  into road pizza is a GREAT reason to neuter a dog.

ONLY IF YOU'RE A VETERINARIAN GETTIN PAID TO
SURGICALLY SEXUALLY MUTILATE INNOCENT
DEFENSELESS DUMB CRITTERS, josh.

>   People who own unneutered males should go ahead
>  and set aside $3000 for health care.

To give to YOU, josh?

> If you don't use it for surgery and radiation for the cancer,
> you'll need it to put his legs and/or pelvis back together
> after the car hits him.

THAT'S MALARKEY, josh.

Surgically sexually mutilated dogs have a shorter life
span and a greater likelihood for prostate cancer:

"Canine prostate carcinoma: epidemiological
evidence of an increased risk in castrated dogs."

"Neutered bitches lived longest of dogs dying
of all causes, though entire bitches lived longest
of dogs dying of natural causes, with neutered
males having the shortest lifespan in each category."

"Cancer was the most common cause of death in
the groups as a whole, accounting for 44.9% of
deaths of entire males, 34.7% of deaths of neutered
males, 50.2% of deaths of entire females, and 39.6%
of deaths of neutered females."

"The interval between castration and onset of prostatic
problems was highly variable, suggesting that castration
does not initiate the development of PCA in the dog, but
it does favour tumor progression."

 "COMMENTARY: This article supports previous studies
 showing BPH as the most common prostate disease in
 dogs; that prostate carcinoma is relatively rare; and that
 the prevalence of prostate carcinoma is higher in castrated
 dogs than in intact dogs.

The age of castration had no effect on the age at
which the tumor was diagnosed. Because prostate
carcinoma is so rare in both intact and neutered dogs,
this should not be a deterrent to castration.

 Prostate carcinoma is seen only in dogs older
 than 6 years. When prostate disease is diagnosed
 in castrated dogs, the probability of cancer is very
 high. - David F. Senior, BVSc, Diplomate ACVIM &
 ECVIM"
          ---------------------------

> Any help would be appreciated

You AIN'T gonna be gettin no doGdameneD HEELP from the
lying dog abusing punk thug cowards and active acute chronic
long term incurable mental cases and unscrupulHOWES ignorant
veterinary malpracticioners who post here abHOWETS.

J Vet Intern Med 1987 Oct-Dec;1(4):183-7

The influence of castration on the development of prostatic
carcinoma in the dog. 43 cases (1978-1985). Obradovich J,
Walshaw R, Goullaud E

Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary
Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824.

Prostatic carcinoma (PC) was diagnosed in 43 dogs at the Michigan State
University Veterinary Clinical Center (MSU-VCC) between 1978 and 1985.

Of the 43 dogs with histologically confirmed PC, 19 (44.19%) had been
castrated at least three years prior to the development of any
prostatic
disease. Seven of the castrates had been neutered at less than 12
months of age. Fourteen dogs (32.55%) were presented as intact males
at the time of diagnosis. The remaining ten dogs (23.62%) had been
castrated as treatment for presumptive prostatic disease prior to
referral
to the MSU-VCC. Dates of castration were known in all cases.

In this study, therefore, castration at any age showed no sparing
effect
on the risk of development of PC in the dog. The etiology of PC in the
dog may not be exclusively related to testicular hormones.

Work in humans suggests that the adrenal and pituitary glands play
a significant role in the disease. Preliminary work in dogs supports
that nontesticular androgens exert a significant influence on the
canine
prostate.

>From the Merck Veterinary Manual 8th Edition

Page 416 - The Thyroid Gland

Clinical Findings: Although onset is variable, hypothyroidism is most
common
in dogs 4-10 years old. It usually affects mid-to large-size breeds and
is rare
in toy and miniature breeds. Breeds reported to be predisposed include
the
Golden Retriever, Doberman Pinscher, Irish Setter, Miniature Schnauzer,
Dachshund, Cocker Spaniel, and Airedale Terrier.

There does not appear to be a sex predilection, but the risk of
developing
hypothyroidism appears to be higher in spayed females than in intact
females.

Cardiac tumors in dogs: 1982-1995.
Ware WA, Hopper DL.

J Vet Intern Med 1999 Mar-Apr;13(2):95-103
A Veterinary Medical Database search from 1982 to 1995 identified 1,383
dogs
with tumors of the heart from a total population of 729,265 dogs (0.19%
incidence). Hemangiosarcoma (HSA) was the most common cardiac
tumoridentified.

In the subset of dogs with specific histologic diagnoses, the number
with HSA
was almost 10-fold that of the 2nd most common tumor, aortic body
tumor.
Primary heart tumors were more common than cardiac metastases.

When biologic behavior was noted, most heart tumors were classified as
malignant. Cardiac tumors (excluding lymphoma) occurred most often in
dogs between the ages of 7 and 15 years. In very old dogs (>15 years),
the frequency of cardiac tumors was the same or lower than that of the
youngest age group. Tumors occurred with similar frequency in males
and females, but the relative risk for spayed females was >4 times that

for intact females. For HSA, spayed females had >5 times greater
relative
risk than did intact females.

The risk for castrated males was slightly greater than that for intact
males,
which had 2.4 times the relative risk of intact females. Thus,
neutering
appeared to increase the risk of cardiac tumor in both sexes.

Intact females were least likely to develop a cardiac tumor, whereas
spayed
females were most likely to develop a tumor. Twelve breeds had greater
than
average risk of developing a cardiac tumor, whereas 17 had lower risk.

Influence of Gender and timing of Gonadectomy on risk for appendicular
bone sarcoma in Rottweilers

Cooley DM, Beranek B, Glickman LT, Waters DJ.
Departments of Veterinary Clinical Sciences and Veterinary Pathobiology
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907

Background: The role of sex hormones in bone sarcomagenesis has not
been
extensively studied. In a previous study using the Veterinary Medical
Database
(VMDB), Ru et al. (Vet J 1998:156??-39) found a significantly increased
risk for
osteosarcoma in castrated males and spayed females compared with
sexually
intact dogs.

However, this VMDB- based study could not evaluate whether age at
neutering significantly influenced osteosarcoma risk. Purpose: To
determine if gender or
lifetime duration of gonadal exposure influences the risk for
appendicular bone
sarcoma in Rottweilers.

Methods: Data were obtained from owners of 746 purebred Rottweilers as
part
of a nationwide, population based study. Each dog owner completed a
questionnaire
regarding gender neuter status, age at spay or castration, bone tumor
occurence,
age at diagnosis, current vital status and age of death.

The incidence of appendicular bone sarcoma per 1000 dog years at risk
was determined for intact males, castrated males, intact females, and
spayed females.
The relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence limit of appendicular bone
sarcoma
was calculated by dividing the incidence rate for each gender-neuter
category
by the incidence rate for intact males (reference category; rr=1.0).
For males and
females, the influence of lifetime exposure to gonadal hormones on bone
sarcoma
was determined by comparison of the incidence of four subgroups
stratified by age
at neutering.

Results: Appendicular bone sarcoma affected 111 of 746 (14.9%)
Rottweilers.
The RR for bone sarcoma was 1.64 for castrated males, 1.36 for spayed
females
and 1.04 for intact females. Females spayed at <1 year of age had a
significantly
increased risk for appendicular bone sarcoma compared with intact
females
(RR=2.21). Similarly, males castrated at <1 year of age had a
significantly increased
risk for bone sarcoma compared with intact males (RR=3.12%)
Conclusions: In this
population-based study, Rottweilers that underwent gonadectomy at <1
year of age
had a significantly increased risk for bone sarcoma.

These observations may be explained by either a direct effect of sex
hormones
on skeletal homeostasis or by indirect effects on body conformation or
physical
 activity.

Alternately, confounding factors unique to dogs that undergo
early spay or castration may account for this association

From: michael <c...@dogtv.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:04:57 GMT

Subject: Re: Neutering & Health (everything our "experts"
                      have preached for YEARS is wrong)

Canine prostate carcinoma: epidemiological evidence of an increased
risk
in castrated dogs.

Teske E, Naan EC, van Dijk EM, Van Garderen E, Schalken JA.

Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Utrecht
University, P.O. Box 80.154, 3508 TD, Utrecht, The Netherlands

The present retrospective study investigated the frequency of prostate
carcinoma (PCA) among prostate abnormalities in dogs and determined
whether castration influences the incidence of PCA in dogs. During the
years 1993-1998, 15363 male dogs were admitted to the Utrecht
University
Clinic of Companion Animals, and of these dogs 225 were diagnosed with
prostatic disease. In addition, another 206 male dogs were diagnosed as
having prostatic disease based on cytologic examination of aspiration
biopsies submitted by referring veterinarians. Benign prostatic
hyperplasia was diagnosed in 246 dogs (57.1%), prostatitis in 83 dogs
(19.3%), and PCA in 56 dogs (13%). Dogs with PCA were significantly
older (mean age=9.9 years) than dogs with other prostatic diseases
(mean
age=8.4 years). The Bouvier des Flandres breed had an increased risk
(odds ratio (OR)=8.44; 95% CI 4.38-16.1) of having PCA. Castration
(26/56) increased the risk (OR=4.34; 95% CI 2.48-7.62) of PCA. The mean
age at diagnosis of PCA in castrated dogs and in intact male dogs was
not significantly different. The interval between castration and onset
of prostatic problems was highly variable, suggesting that castration
does not initiate the development of PCA in the dog, but it does favour
tumor progression.

From: michael <c...@dogtv.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:44:49 GMT

Subject: Re: Neutering & Health (everything our "experts"
                       have preached for YEARS is wrong)

WalterNY wrote:
>michael <c...@dogtv.com> wrote in message <news:3DD9636E.7010508@dogtv.com>...
>>Canine prostate carcinoma: epidemiological evidence of an increased risk
>>in castrated dogs.
>>Teske E, Naan EC, van Dijk EM, Van Garderen E, Schalken JA.
>>Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Utrecht
>>University, P.O. Box 80.154, 3508 TD, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Hello WalterNY,

I'm not talking about our "scientist experts." As they are a lot MOORE
free from bias than our so-called "expert" spay and neuter nazi
nannies.
A brain dead contingent of primarily white, suburban, overfed,
undersexed
radical control freak TOXIC MOMMIES who pave the road to heel with
their
good intentions.

For DECADES they have disinformed the public about the so-called
DANGERS
of a dog living with all the natural organs the dog was born with. VETS
are complicit in this as well, because SPAY and NEUTERING is a PROFIT
CENTER for many of them, much like VACCINES are.

But this is the CHANGING of the MUZZLE and SMARTENING UP of the
PUPULACE.

For DECADES our Spay and Neuter Nazis have nagged and scolded and lied
and skewed and pupularized the idea that sex organs on a dog are an
EVIL, a veritable cancer waiting to happen. They have used FEAR and
IGNORANCE and LOATHING for dogs so that they could further their goal
of
the ELIMINATION of dogs. Dogs (yes, actual dogs themselves) make our
so-called "dog lovers" radically uncomfortable and they are driven to
round them up and systematically ELIMINTATE them in our so-called
"Shelters."

They have PROMULGATED the LIE of a "PUPULATION CRISIS" in order to
justify their means of radically removing sex organs from dogs and dogs
themselves from society. They don't believe a dog has a right to live
if
it is uncaged, unfenced and unowned. Meanwhile, they care nothing about
loose, unowned deer, squirrels, rats, possums, etc... and to a lesser
extent CATS. It is only DOGS that DRIVE THEM CRAZY with the desire to
ELIMINATE them from the streets of America.

They think there is TOO MANY DOGS and they are desperate to GET RID OF
THEM. They claim to be "dog lovers" but really their main and ONLY
concern is CONTROLLING PEOPLE that they deem "irresponsible."

Unfounded FEAR of rabies drives the OVERvaccination of the Pupulace and
UNFOUNDED fears of CANCER and UNFOUNDED FEAR of UNCONTROLLABLE intact
dogs drive the POUND OF FLESH that our so-called "dog lovers" radically
DEMAND be cut out of our dogs to "FIX" them.

But I got news for ya WalterNY.

DOGS AIN'T BROKE! And they don't need radical, invasive surgery in
order
to "FIX" them.

Welcome to the NEW MUZZLE.

I'll be your host:

http://dogtv.com/michael_matty.rm
http://dogtv.com/michael_matty.rm
http://dogtv.com/michael_matty.rm
http://dogtv.com/michael_matty.rm
http://dogtv.com/michael_matty.rm

Look for MOORE of me on TV discussing this and sundry other dog issues.
YOU HEARD IT HERE FIRST!

this is michael
reporting live...
from the NEW MUZZLE of  Dog Training

http://dogtv.com
http://changethemuzzle.com

From: Michael Patton <zzen...@earthlink.net>
Date: 1999/11/20
Subject: Sex and the Modern Day Spay and Neuter Nazi...

Eric Hayreh wrote:
> Jerry
> Maybe if you kept it short you wouldn't annoy so many people.  Say what you
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> In Britain there is always a drive to get pets neutered to try and reduce
> stray problems and unwanted dogs.

In Britain, there is also always a drive to exterminate
whole breeds of dog, and/or force whole breeds of dog to
live miserably, by forcing them to wear muzzles at all times
in public.  All this, is spurred on by people who think they
are doing it in the interest of dogs.

Congratulations!  You've done so well, that you've exported
your hate toward dogs to America and many other points West
and East...

You see, the vast majority of spay and neuter nazis, whether
in the US or Britain, aren't really interested in dogs at
all.  They are interested in control.  They have a
bloodthirsty desire to cut out the sex organs of dogs, yes
any dogs they can get their hooks into, all this, of course,
in order to "save" dogs.  Dig beneath the surface, and you
see that all they are really interested in, is in obtaining
some type of "control" and "ownership" of the dog "problem"
by presenting themselves as the "good guys" and obtaining
some cheap moral authority which allows them to feel good
about themselves and their pernicious quest to stigmatize
and eliminate a fundamental part of dogs, their reproductive
organs.

Are you still with me, sweetie?

The vast majority of spay and neuter nazis are pitiful
control freaks who fear and detest dogs as they really are,
and who are too cowardly to go afer the people who cause all
the supposed problems in the Dog Game....so they take their
pound of flesh where they can get it, out of the dog, and it
gives them some satisfaction and helps them think they are
bettering life for dogs.  They hystericalize to mythological
proportions the supposed "overpopulation" and "health"
problems related to dog sex organs, and make it seem like a
dog with sex organs is a disaster waiting to happen...

All of which is to further their own pathetic, self serving
agenda, and all of which has little or nothing to do with
the overall long term benefit of dog in society.

Are you still with me, Sweetie?

What the Spay and Neuter Nazis don't realize, sweetie, is
that by encouraging and demanding the elimination of dog sex
organs so rabidly, they are unwittingly participating in the
overall stigmatization and elimination of dogs altogether.

Sex organs are a fundamental part of dogs and dogs are (or
at least, "were") a fundamental part of society.  Let's see
how long it lasts with friends like the Spay and Neuter
nazis helping out so diligently.

If there is a problem with dogs in society, it has little to
do with their sex organs, and everything to do with the two
legged part of the symbiosis who isn't keeping up their end
of the bargain.  Any extreme focus on the dog end, or the
dog reproductive end of the equation, is simply a quick,
easy, cowardly, scapegoating play for self-gratification by
a do gooder desperate for a cause.

Are you still with me, sweetie?

If your rabid focus is on parts of the dog, then you are not
a part of the solution, you are part of the problem.

Are you still with me sweetie?

Have a nice day!

This is Michael
Reporting Live...
>From the SuperDog Station

http://dogtv.com

From: michael <c...@dogtv.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 01:06:57 GMT
Subject: Re: *ooomph*

The Puppy Wizard wrote:
> These imbeciles are pretty hung up, eh Soup???
> michael wrote:

HOWEdy Wiz,

our spay and neuter nazis' fear and loathing of testicles is emblematic
of their fear and loathing of dogs in general. They are deeply and
shamelessly repulsed by the natural parts which  make up the dog. They
seek to eliminate parts of dogs, to eliminate dogs themselves and
eliminate access to dogs in HOWER society.

They are HOWER dogs worst enemy. Yes, it's the Suja's and the BethF's
and the Tara O's and TaraGreen2's and the "rescue" BWAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!
societies and the shelly and MALinda's who talk a good game, but all
they really want is blood and their pound of flesh.

This sick freaks need to be exposed for the dog haters and enemies of
dog that they are. They need to find another species to busybody into
the ground and love to DEATH.

That's not gonna happen anyMOORE, Wiz. Not on our watch. We're flippin
the script on these Bizatches. It's DOG GAME TIME.

>> If you bitches are so repulsed by testicles, why did you get male dogs
>> in the first place?
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>> truly hideous.
>>> I will take a photo and post.

--
this is michael
reporting live...
http://dogtv.com

with the all
new & exciting
dogtv.com couchcam
Dale Atkin - 19 Dec 2005 03:14 GMT
> This dog will not be getting out and creating unwanted puppies so that
> is not a good reason in this case.

You never know though do you... Even if he's not the father if a litter
suddenly appears in the neighbourhood and your guy isn't fixed, he'll be
suspect. I know around here, a Collie just gave birth to a lab-type puppy.
If my guy wasn't fixed, suspicion certainly would have fallen on him.

The roaming instinct is certainly something to consider. You'll likely have
a much harder time keeping him home if he's intact. Then there's that issue
when some moron brings their dog in heat to the park. Then of course you'll
wonder if the his behavior issues are related to him being intact or not
(and of course you'll never know).

We've got an intact male who routinely escapes around here, and comes
roaming the neighbourhood. AFAIK, there is no real reason that he's intact,
just they never got him fixed. One of these day, he's going to be run over
by a car, or be caught and end up at the humane society. Is it because he's
intact that he's like this? I certainly suspect it.

A better question is, why should you keep him intact?

The arguments I've seen are all pretty flimsy. Its a day or two of
discomfort (and it really doesn't seem to bother them that much). Its a very
routine operation.

Yeah, as a guy, I feel the pain,.but really its for the best.  I know I had
a really hard time bringing my guy in, but I've never regretted it.

Dale
Sharon - 19 Dec 2005 04:33 GMT
> A better question is, why should you keep him intact?

Some men will get a vasectomy for themselves -walk awkwardly for a few days
and sit with a bag of frozen peas in his crotch - before he gets his dog
neutered. Go figure...
IHateToSayItButITOLDYOUSO@Inbox.Com - 20 Dec 2005 01:41 GMT
HOWEDY sharon too,

> > A better question is, why should you keep him intact?
>
> Some men will get a vasectomy for themselves -walk awkwardly for a few days
> and sit with a bag of frozen peas in his crotch - before he gets his dog
> neutered. Go figure...

HOWEDY wilson,

wilson wrote:
> Thanks for the reply sharon,

sharon recommended surgically sexually MUTILATING
your dog to cure his OCD behavior, wilson.

> yes, he has been neutered.

That alone could EXXXPLAIN his OCD behavior, wilson.
Surgically sexually mutilating dogs for non medical
reasons is MALPRACTICE and CAUSES FEAR BEHAVIORS like
your dog is displaying.

>  His "attacks" are very spontaneous.

Your dog started these "attacks" as NIGHTMARES.

As you continued pursuing veterinary medical
treatment of his BEHAVIOR PROBLEM your dog
has NATURALLY PROGRESSED in his OBSESSIVE
COMPULSIVE DIS-EASE to doing so while awake.

> For example, I was walking him today and after
> about 1 mile, he suddenly started to whimper
> and I knew straight away that he was starting.
> 30-40 seconds later he was fine.

Now, with further ignoring of his FEARS it has
NATURALLY PROGRESSED to doing so while walking
on leash with you.

> Once it is over, he returns to being a normal,
> playful dog as if nothing has happened.

Just like when he was first EXXXPERIENCING his NIGHTMARES.

> During his attacks he gives no indication
> of where the pain is coming from

His PAIN is coming from MISTRUST and INSECURITY.

> and I have now completely exhausted my bank
> balance in trying to determine the cause.

That's a very sad commentary on the level of
incompetence in veterinary care, wilson. Your
vet should have discovered that grass seed on
his 1st thourough EXXXAM for UNDIAGNOSED PAIN,
which of curse, was NOT the CAUSE of his FEAR
BEHAVIORS.

> My stress levels are off the scale and I don't
> know what to do.

Well, you JUST GOT LUCKY, wilson. You can CURE
your dog's FEAR BEHAVIOR simply by PRAISING HIM
as per the PRECISE INSTRUCTIONS in your own FREE
COPY of The Amazing Puppy Wizard's 100% CONSISTENTLY
NEARLY INSTANTLY SUCCESSFUL FREE WWW Wits' End Dog
Training Method Manual: http://www.tinyurl.com/7bl5u

From: "The Puppy Wizard" <ThePuppyWiz...@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 19:13:12 GMT

Subject: Cure OCD Behaviors NEARLY INSTANTLY Using PRIASE

          OCD "Success In One Day," Puzzle.

> Bad Dogs May Be Sad Dogs
> Researcher studying canine compulsive disorder
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> distracted by its own shadow that it stopped drinking
> water.

It's much higher than our good doctor supposes.
It'll be another fifteen years before the scientists
understand the full ramifications of stress on behavior
and health.

"Things are beginning to get much worse day
by day and the vets seem unable to help.
http://www.oofus.com/pix/PoorR ufusMed.WMV
http://www.oofus.com/pix/PoorR ufusSmall.WMV"

THAT'S an OCD. It's similar to what professor
SCRUFF SHAKE'S little dog Maxie The Magnificent
FuriHOWESLY Obsessive Compulsive Masturbator
does when he misses his daily five miles of bicycle
chasing exercise to control his HYPERACTIVITY.

>Strange behaviors caused by the disorder are often
>misdiagnosed as neurological problems.

Yeah. Like janet boss's declawed kat attacking her
every time she punishes her dogs. The NEUROLOGIST
is treating her "seizure" activity with valium.

> The longer the behaviors are allowed to continue,
> the more difficult treatment can be, Luescher says.

NO. The "problem" is caused by mishandling.

Stop mishandling the dog and use the non force non
confrontational scientific and psychological
techniques taught in your FREE copy of my FREE
Wits' End Dog Training Method manual and you'll
break any behavior problem in a few minutes over
a couple of days, maybe less. Maybe INSTANTLY.

Subject: OCD "Success In One Day," Puzzle.

HOWEDY People,

Here's an account of a dog who'd been involved in a
traumatic HOWES invasion and is now Ooops! WAS
barking uncontrollably.

I'm countin on 100% success in two days. Care to stake
your life, career, and reputation that I won't cure this
OCD behavior BEFORE three days are up???

>----- Original Message -----
>From: puzzle
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> they get up and move or scratch her) however, she still is
> barking at little things.

Praise her.

> We have never ignored her when she barks (ever since
> she was tiny) we always get up and check what she's
> barking at tell her "good girl" and then "that's enough"
> (her release command). she always stops when I say
> "enough" but my problem is that

NOPE. That's the problem!

YOU GOT TO SAY IT EVERY TIME, or it don't work....

Is THAT training? NOPE...

Training is supposed to control the behavior automatically,
as you like it. Too much, too little, no problem. Just train the
pup to respond as you'd prefer.

You'd prefer her not to bark, follow the technique
and there'll be no more barking. But telling her to STOP,
is only perpetuating your NEEDING to tell her "enough."

Don't improvise on the technique, because "just telling
her ENOUGH" is NOT in the method, and WILL cause
anxiety about the situation and put you at odds with
your pup.

Use distraction and praise till the behavior is extinguished
instead of stopping the behavior by forced control, i.e.,
"enough." Even though you're not saying it in a scolding
way, you're still arguing with your dog.

> since that guy was stalking me she barks at the tiniest sound,

Praise first, tell her it's O.K., and then interrupt further
barking
with distraction and praise, calling her as a default should the
distraction / praise fail, and then RELEASE her to attempt
another bark if that's her desire, so you may break that attempt
using distract/praise till the behavior is properly extinguished.

That way you can train her to only bark enough to alert you
when something disturbs her. Then you can train her to
not bark at all but to come get you to say there's sumpthin
up...

> the neighbors across the street coming home,

Praise first, then tell her it's friends, more praise, next
bark distract / praise and LET HER WORK THROUGH
the problem till it's extinguished and then generalize it
in other areas. When she looks like she's about to bark
but hasn't YET, PRAISE THAT and prepare to interrupt
her next bark following the VARIABLE distraction and
praise technique.

> the cat in the kitty litter,

EZ. Same same. Every thing is same same. If you can't
envision the sameness of a problem, give me a holler
and we'll look at it from every angle till we see HOWE'S
best to deal with it. You're better off to momentarily avoid
or even ignore a problem RATHER than jump into an issue
you're not prepared to PROPERLY EXTINGUISH. That's
HOWE bad habits and OCD's are caused. Like this one.

> some one walking on the other side of the street,

Relax. You're walkin down your own street, every thing
is O.K. friends and you're not going to pull back on her
lead to force control, you'll continue as you desire and
simply interrupt any inappropriate action or thought with
distract/praise for 5-15 seconds.

> she only reacts like this when I'm in bed

No problem. The OBJECTIVE of training is to have the
behaviors you desire and extinguish those you don't.
The techniques will break the behaviors as best they
can, but some behaviors are going to always be
restimulated by the outside sounds or the kat trying
to get her goat.

Just follow the routine and every behavior will come
into control as she learns to not need to respond to
every sound and every temptation the kat offers.
Should take a couple of days.

> so it means I'm getting woken any where between
> 2 and 5 times a night.

Not for long. So long as you don't get frustrated and holler
SHUDDUP! That'll cause her anxiety and you're back in
the jackpot again. Follow the technique and in one or
two nites you should be cuttin Zzzzz's right through.

But that may require a couple nites for you to make
a sound distraction and praise, and then if she barks
again, you'll probably need to SILENTLY get up and
go to where you're able to present the sound
distraction from opposite of that of the last one from
your bed.

If you're in a small bedroom you might be able to
snap your fingers on one side of the bed and then
the other, depending on the layout. Like say the
window is at the foot of the bed and you dog is
at your feet standing there 12' away. You might
be able to reach over and snap your fingers
from alternate sides of the bed and be all set.

>i've tried letting her sleep in the bed room,

If my dogs are chewing or scratching or even panting
too loudly, I can distract and praise them quietly enough
not to disturb the Mrs.

> but that just makes it worse- as she doesn't sleep at all
>but sits in the "alert" position facing the door.

NO PROBLEM. Distract and praise every anxious thought
or behavior. Notice her breathing. If she's huffing and puffing
that's anxiety, distract and praise till it's extinguished and
she'll sleep. If it takes you fifty times tonite, break each
symptom of anxiety using the techniques and you'll be DONE
by tomorrow nite.

> at least if I leave her to sleep downstairs she snoozes
>on her bed (near the back door).

She probably feels safe there cause she's got the
jump on an intruder. Work my methods and she'll
feel safe trusting your judgement. Correcting her
has DIMINISHED her confidence in your ability
to PROTECT the HOWES because in her mind
you're not aware enough to know there's somethin
spookey out there!

Teach her to understand REAL spooks from phantasms.

> I realise that she is just doing her job,

Right. Pay her and she's done!

> but do you have any ideas on how to calm down her

Hyper-vigilence,

Yup follow the techniques to extinguish any inappropriate
behaviors, feelings, thoughts etc. I've got other techniques
and guaranteed sure fire cures for this and all behaviors,
but this is the starting point for you. Get your handling
techniques up to par and your dog will have no problems
because you won't be creating any stress. Crating is
a major problem for this sort of issue so DON'T be crating
him to calm him down cause it'll likely backfire.

> or is it some thing that's just gonna take time??

I dunno. Should be DONE by tomorrow nite if you
can do all of the exercises in part 1 of your manual.
That'll insure you've got all the confidence issues
straightened out through the Family Leadership Exercise
and the come command as a conditioned reflex.

Is that soon enough for you? If not, I can put the Elves
on it for you but they could be flighty if I disturb them
unnecessarily. Just ask me if you have difficulty with
the methods.

> She doesn't react this way at all when my husband is home,

Because he's POWERFUL. You're defenseless. Also, if
he's more stern with her than you are, it will cause her
much insecurity and that's got to be dealt with or she'll
always be overstimulated by his 'proper handling.' It
doesn't take much repression to cause major anxiety
problems.

Tellin a dog not to bark or ignoring when he's scared is
repressive and causes much anxiety. You can't
command a crying baby to go back to sleep, you
check and reassure him and set him down when
he's ready to catch some Zzzz's.

> but his work takes him away for about 9mths of the year...
> and quiet frankly it's starting to feel like sleep deprevision

torture.

No problem. Give this till tomorrow nite and call me
if you can't sleep and ask me to tell you HOWE COME
you can't get your dog to shut up!!!

> I also suspect that it's starting to become attention seeking

That's another reason we don't respond as our 'common sense'
might tell us to. Most of my training methods are CONTRAWISE,
to quote a soon to be famous ANAL-ytic behaviorist who recommends
scruff shaking and is comfortable with shock collars if YOU are.

> as when I appear to check the noise, she grabs a toy and
>does the happy dance (tail wagging full body wriggle) cute

THAT'S an ANXIETY RELIEF mechanism from...repressing her barking.

> but not so endearing at 3 am!!!

You COULD rather easily teach her to shove the toy into
her own mouth each time she thinks of barking. Should
be able to do that in about ten minutes, given the set up.

> any idea's would be appreciated

Naaah. You don't need me for ideas. I'll help you through
the basics, and then you'll use your ideas to make your
dog naturally want to do every thing you ask. Just ask
if you need any help or really really run out of ideas.
Sometimes I think for a couple days about a problem
before figuring out all the ramifications of everything
and come up with a set up or lesson plan to extinguish
the behavior.

> at this stage !!!

As stated. You'll get the basics down, and then you'll
follow the technique, and most of the problems will
be done by tomorrow nite. If you have a special
concern just back up and look at it from the big
picture and don't focus on the SYMPTOM.

Although it's not often necessary to go into deep
worry about the cause of a problem, sometimes
if you got a pain in the butt it might help to stand
up and remove the tack from your seat instead
of taking a pain killer.

For behaviors that don't resolve quickly using
appropriate methods we can be pretty sure it's
a physical problem or a consistent source of stress.

Try to figure out the stressor or physical cause,
and then you'll be able to break the anxiety.

In this case the barking is not cause by the noises,
it's caused by lack of confidence in you, complicated
by the strong persona of the Mr., giving her false
messages. IOW, if Mr. was an omnipotent leader,
he'd be able to control the noises when he's not
there to take charge.

That's what we tell the dog when we force control.

> thank you so much for your manual-

My pleasure. I'm looking forward to updating it soon.

> I've passed it on to my sister (who is getting a G.
> shep. puppy in a few weeks and is v. excited about
> your method)

Excellent.

>  thanks !!!

My pleasure. Just ask if you need any help. Keep me
posted. I expect to hear from you in two or three days
sayin he's 100% cured.

>  puzzle & crash-dog

The Amazing Puppy Wizard. <{} ; ~  )   >
showdogbark@yahoo.com - 20 Dec 2005 02:43 GMT
jerry ninny poop, you are a dog!
showdogbark@yahoo.com - 21 Dec 2005 07:11 GMT
it is only alright to neuter a dog when it is a danger to itself or
others, by beahvios such as being at large ( mostly in male dogs) that
the dog can be in a car accident so unless you have a yard, the best
thing would be to neuter it. it does need to only be done when the
testicals have dropped at about the age of six or seven months.
showdogbark@yahoo.com - 21 Dec 2005 23:51 GMT
nUt,re nOn
p,IGh
ISIS
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.