Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Mammals
FerretsGuinea PigsHamstersRabbitsRats
Aquaria
GeneralMarine ReefFreshwaterPlantsCichlidsGoldfish
Birds
BirdsParrots
Miscellaneous
Animal HealthPet Loss
PetKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Pet Forum / Miscellaneous / Animal Health / January 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Diamond Dog Food

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Gabby's Mom - 12 Jan 2006 22:52 GMT
I hope no one has to go through the loss of a loved one due to Diamond.
If so, my deepest sympathies.

Please forward the link below to anyone you know who may be interested
or has had a negative encounter with the food!


http://www.thepetlawyer.com/Dogfoodpage.html
josh - 13 Jan 2006 04:10 GMT
>I hope no one has to go through the loss of a loved one due to Diamond.
> If so, my deepest sympathies.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> http://www.thepetlawyer.com/Dogfoodpage.html

Not that I don't think people should sue for recompense when a company
obviously screws up this badly, but how 'bout we don't feed the ambulance
chasers?
John Wesley - 13 Jan 2006 04:40 GMT
> >I hope no one has to go through the loss of a loved one due to Diamond.
> > If so, my deepest sympathies.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> obviously screws up this badly, but how 'bout we don't feed the ambulance
> chasers?

In my state dogs are considered property and the only thing a court will
give you is the cost of the dog.  The company has already offered to do
that and medical bills.  In my state a lawyer isn't going to get you any
more than they are being offered so I think it would just be a waste of
money.  

I hate to say this at such a bad time but this is yet another good
reason not to buy discount dog food.
buglady - 13 Jan 2006 14:26 GMT
> I hate to say this at such a bad time but this is yet another good
> reason not to buy discount dog food.

.........It's not discount dog food.  They were testing for aflatoxin.
There's a problem with the corn crop in the SE and as soon as they knew that
they instituted more tests.  In late December Japan ordered a corn shipment
from the US destroyed due to presence of aflatoxin.  Do you think that corn
was not inspected either?  This is a horrible human error.  We still don't
know how the contaminated corn got into the plant instead of being rejected,
but this scenario could happen to any company.  It still may if all the
other companies don't start taking extra precautions.

FWIW I don't feed kibble at all.

buglady
take out the dog before replying
Nicole H - 14 Jan 2006 01:02 GMT
Buglady
Thanks for confirming that Diamond isn't a cheap food.  It's only sold here
in feed stores next to Innova, Canidae, etc.

I used to work for Paramount Farms and we were always screening for
aflatoxin.  Our products were all nuts (pistachios, almonds, walnuts, etc).
Unfortunately, even with all the testing, a few bins got buy.

What do you feed if not kibble?  I have large dogs ( 75lbs and 120lbs or
so).. can't imagine making dinner for them.  My kids would probably get
jealous LOL
Nicole

>> I hate to say this at such a bad time but this is yet another good
>> reason not to buy discount dog food.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> buglady
> take out the dog before replying
sighthounds & siberians - 14 Jan 2006 02:05 GMT
>Buglady
>Thanks for confirming that Diamond isn't a cheap food.  It's only sold here
>in feed stores next to Innova, Canidae, etc.

It's hardly comparable to Innova and Canidae, however.  Those are
super-premium foods; Diamond is not.  The better varieties of Diamond
are okay foods, not great.  

Mustang Sally
Nicole H - 14 Jan 2006 20:07 GMT
how sneaky to put it between the premium food.

>>Buglady
>>Thanks for confirming that Diamond isn't a cheap food.  It's only sold
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Mustang Sally
sighthounds & siberians - 14 Jan 2006 20:20 GMT
>how sneaky to put it between the premium food.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> super-premium foods; Diamond is not.  The better varieties of Diamond
>> are okay foods, not great.

How sneaky to top-post.

I didn't say it was sneaky to put it with premium foods.  I said
Diamond isn't comparable in quality to foods such as Innova and
Canidae.  You don't need to believe me; anyone who can read and
interpret labels will see that.

Mustang Sally
Nicole H - 17 Jan 2006 02:57 GMT
Oh the horrors of top posting.  Mustang, I wrote that it was sneaky.  I
realize you were too busy to see that since you were trying to be the law of
the newsgroup.
Time to chill out.
buglady - 14 Jan 2006 13:48 GMT
> I used to work for Paramount Farms and we were always screening for
> aflatoxin.  Our products were all nuts (pistachios, almonds, walnuts, etc).
> Unfortunately, even with all the testing, a few bins got buy.

............Yes, it can happen.  What the public doesn't realize is that
there are allowed limits and just because their food isn't Diamond doesn't
mean it's aflatoxin free.

> What do you feed if not kibble?  I have large dogs ( 75lbs and 120lbs or
> so).. can't imagine making dinner for them.

......I don't have to make it, I just defrost it.  I feed a raw diet.

buglady
take out the dog before replying
Steve Crane - 14 Jan 2006 02:26 GMT
> .........It's not discount dog food.

I would agree it's not the $9.99 for 50 pounds type food, but calling
it a "premium" might be a stretch. I suspect their biggest business
isn't in the Diamond brand anyway, but rather the COSTCO Kirkland
Signature and Nutra Nuggets products. They have a number of brands
under different labels. Premium Edge, Country Value, Professional,
Chicken Soup, Nutra Gold (overseas only), and the short lived, ill
fated, Bayer Healthy Life food.

They were testing for aflatoxin.
> There's a problem with the corn crop in the SE and as soon as they knew that
> they instituted more tests.  In late December Japan ordered a corn shipment
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> but this scenario could happen to any company.  It still may if all the
> other companies don't start taking extra precautions.

Very true! Most have known of the problem since late summer and I
suspect most have imposed much more stringent testing. There seems to
have been a string of these this past year. Venezuela and Malaysia both
had contaminated foods and then the year before it was PetCurean's Go!
Natural made by Merrick that apparently had some kind of problem nobody
ever figured out.
buglady - 14 Jan 2006 13:50 GMT
There seems to
> have been a string of these this past year. Venezuela and Malaysia both
> had contaminated foods and then the year before it was PetCurean's Go!
> Natural made by Merrick that apparently had some kind of problem nobody
> ever figured out.

......with as dry as it is in TX, I wouldn't be surprised if they also had
an ongoing problem.

buglady
take out the dog before replying
Nicole H - 17 Jan 2006 03:01 GMT
Buglady,
At Paramont, all the orchards are irrigated and testing is frequently done
for aflatoxin.  So I guess it could be a problem anywhere.
John Wesley - 14 Jan 2006 04:19 GMT
> > I hate to say this at such a bad time but this is yet another good
> > reason not to buy discount dog food.
>
> .........It's not discount dog food.  

They make grocery store brands and costco brand.  To me thats discount.

> They were testing for aflatoxin.
> There's a problem with the corn crop in the SE and as soon as they knew that
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> buglady
> take out the dog before replying
Steve Crane - 15 Jan 2006 13:56 GMT
> > > I hate to say this at such a bad time but this is yet another good
> > > reason not to buy discount dog food.
> >
> > .........It's not discount dog food.
>
> They make grocery store brands and costco brand.  To me thats discount.

I would agree - "store label" brands, regardless of which one, are
generally the least expensive foods on the market. Ol Roy, Kirkland
Signature (COSTCO), Safeway Select, Kroger, etc. are products developed
to meet a store price point and put out to bid. Lowest bidder gets the
job. The following is from the Oregon vet board - not a confirmation by
any means, but interesting

The following message was sent to the Veterinary Board office.  I am
forwarding to you as information only without endorsement or comment.

From: Anderson, Michelle Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 11:16 AM
To: OVMEB Info
Subject: Diamond pet food

I know Diamond pet foods has denied that Kirkland food (sold at
Costco) is affected by their recall, but my cat has been affected, he
went
into liver failure the beginning of November, and almost died.  He's
only 4
years old, and has been on Kirkland for the last 3 years.  My vet had
5 other families with the same symptoms in their cats, 1 cat died, 4 of
those families used Kirkland Cat Food from Costco in Oregon.  2 other
vets locally (Forest Grove, Oregon) also said they had cats that had
the same symptoms and used Kirkland Cat Food, 1 cat died, 3 other vets
in
the area said they had sick cats and dogs with the same symptoms that
are calling the pet owners and asking what food they use, my guess
would be Kirkland.  I talked to Diamond pet food vets 2 different
times, and
Diamond has denied that it's possible for Oregon food to be affected,
but it's not a coincidence that all these pets in Oregon are becoming
sick with the same symptoms and the only link is Kirkland cat/dog
food. I have all my vet records and tests if you would like to see
them.
I'm trying to bring this to everyone's attention before more animals
needlessly suffer and die.  My cat was hooked up to a IV for 4 days at
the vets the first time, then he was sent home for me to force feed
him and continue the IV.  He wasn't getting better so he went back 2
weeks
later (Nov 23) and was admitted again for 6 days, they had to
surgically implant a feeding tube directly into his stomache so he
could be fed,
and was hooked up to a iv as well.  He was given a VERY slim chance to
live, I honestly believe the only reason he survived was because I
have the most AMAZING vet, with a very dedicated staff.  He went home
and I
had to feed him through his tube for 3 more weeks.  He's finally doing
better, but there's no way to know the long term affects this poison
had on him.  He's still VERY thin, and suffered tremendously, because
Diamond is hiding this information.

Michelle Anderson
Providence Health plans
Metro B team
buglady - 15 Jan 2006 14:17 GMT
The following is from the Oregon vet board - not a confirmation by
> any means, but interesting

........And how is this different from the people who say Hills causes dry
flaky skin?

........The writer of this letter assumes Diamond is lying.  I still don't
know that that is true.  You know very well that association is not
necessarily causation.  At least you hold to that view WRT flaky dry skin
and Hills products.

buglady
take out the dog before replying
Steve Crane - 16 Jan 2006 03:01 GMT
Apparently it's a fine point I guess - but dry flaky skin is a bit of a
way from being dead, don't ya think?
buglady - 16 Jan 2006 13:08 GMT
> Apparently it's a fine point I guess - but dry flaky skin is a bit of a
> way from being dead, don't ya think?

.......that's not the point and you know it.  You have cows when someone
disses Hills through anecdotal evidence.  The letter was posted on a vet
site, but was from an owner, who claimed to *know* of other cases she claims
were due to the food.  And I think it's kind of chickenshit for them to post
it and have no comment.  Hysteria is catching.  If it turns out Diamond is
*hiding* evidence, they're done as a company.

buglady
take out the dog before replying
John Wesley - 16 Jan 2006 18:50 GMT
> > Apparently it's a fine point I guess - but dry flaky skin is a bit of a
> > way from being dead, don't ya think?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> it and have no comment.  Hysteria is catching.  If it turns out Diamond is
> *hiding* evidence, they're done as a company.

Diamond is already done.  It doesn't matter what they do.  No one is
going to buy dog food that has killed dogs no matter how many checks
they have in place now.  Its just not human nature.

jw
buglady - 16 Jan 2006 22:04 GMT
> Diamond is already done.  It doesn't matter what they do.  No one is
> going to buy dog food that has killed dogs no matter how many checks
> they have in place now.  Its just not human nature.

.........Don't think so.   They'll only go down if they're trying to subvert
the truth.  This isn't the first time this has happened.  Did you quit
eating cereal, watermelon, hamburgers when they made people sick?

buglady
take out the dog before replying
John Wesley - 16 Jan 2006 23:28 GMT
> > Diamond is already done.  It doesn't matter what they do.  No one is
> > going to buy dog food that has killed dogs no matter how many checks
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the truth.  This isn't the first time this has happened.  Did you quit
> eating cereal, watermelon, hamburgers when they made people sick?

Its just like the food poisoning case here locally with Golden Coral.  
The health dept. shut the place down and had them clean everything with
clorox.  That place was probably 10 times cleaner after the food
poisoning case.  It wasn't even Golden Corals fault it was food they got
from a distributor.  They went out of business.  No one was killed but
it was just enough bad press to get 'em.  Bad press is hard to get by.  

> buglady
> take out the dog before replying
Steve Crane - 17 Jan 2006 00:54 GMT
> Diamond is already done.  It doesn't matter what they do.  No one is
> going to buy dog food that has killed dogs no matter how many checks
> they have in place now.  Its just not human nature.

I doubt it will affect them much at all. Remember that 90% of pet
owners don't read the newspaper, or watch the TV news at night - except
for the sports section I suppose. Most consumers will never figure out
that Diamond had a problem. Secondly the Diamond brand is a small part
of their business. The COSTCO Kirkland Signature, Nutra Nuggets,
Premium Edge, Chicken soup, Nutra Gold and Professional brands will
hardly notice anything and that's where a huge hunk of thier business
is. If the actual Diamond brand were much damaged - and I doubt that
will happen either, they have the majority of their business under
other brands that will remain pretty much unaffected. They could simply
change out the Diamond brand for Premium edge or Professional or
something else with the same retailers and the consumers would buy the
the same food under another label and never know the difference.
John Wesley - 17 Jan 2006 05:17 GMT
> They could simply
> change out the Diamond brand for Premium edge or Professional or
> something else with the same retailers and the consumers would buy the
> the same food under another label and never know the difference.

Thats a real good point!  I can see them doing that!

jw
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.