Thanks buglady,
Its a lot to take in. Actually I can answer a few of the things you brought
up.
> .......I think most vets consider the giardia vaccine as nonessential. To
> me, it's a vaccine in search of a disease. Have your dogs ever been
> diagnosed with Giardia?
No, but I think I'm probably in a higher risk group than most due to the
amount I take my dogs out in to the woods with me, and the amount they drink
from mountain streams and what not (exactly what they tell people not to do,
to avoid getting it...)
> ......Giardia is a major problem in infants in developing countries due to
> fecal contamination of water. That doesn't mean your dogs need a vaccine,
> because it won't fix this problem. I didn't search enough to find out if
> they've got a vaccine for humans, but I didn't find any indication that
> there is one that works.
Actually this is where I first came across the information. We were chatting
in my genetics class, and the subject came up of how its a lot easier to get
vaccines approved for animal use than people use. Apparently my genetics
prof knew the folks who came up with the giardia vaccine. They apparently
looked at the prices to get it approved for use in people, and said, nope we
don't have those kinds of dollars. It just cost too much. There is
apparently no reason though why the same vaccine shouldn't work for people
though (even though it would be illegal to inject yourself or someone else
with it...)
> .....As most things, it appears the host defense system is the most
> important factor in taking care of Giardia infection:
> http://iai.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/70/1/11
This is what made me think about it for the old dog. His immune system may
be going downhill a bit (he is older after all), and anything I can do to
boulster it up might help...
> AAHA recommendations for vaccines 2006. The Giardia vaccine is not
> recommended because all it does is reduce cyst shedding.
> http://www.aahanet.org/About_aaha/vaccine_guidelines06.pdf#search=%22CVM%20g
> iardia%20vaccine%20dog%22
I'll have to look some more at that. Some things I read suggested that it
prevented infection, and other things I read suggested that helped control
the infection, and yet another article I read suggested that it didn't do
squat for already infected dogs...
> If you want more to read on Giardia go to Google Scholar (hit more and
> even
> more at main Google site) and input Giardia vaccine.
good point. I've got access to a lot of journals though the university
(trying to get in to vet school), maybe something good to be found in
them...
Dale
buglady - 18 Aug 2006 17:16 GMT
I think I'm probably in a higher risk group than most due to the
> amount I take my dogs out in to the woods with me, and the amount they drink
> from mountain streams and what not (exactly what they tell people not to do,
> to avoid getting it...)
...........All the more indication that if they've been continually exposed
and haven't been suffering from bouts of diarrhea, then they're probably
immune. Nature has a way of taking care of a lot of these things!
Apparently my genetics
> prof knew the folks who came up with the giardia vaccine. They apparently
> looked at the prices to get it approved for use in people, and said, nope we
> don't have those kinds of dollars. It just cost too much. There is
> apparently no reason though why the same vaccine shouldn't work for people
> though (even though it would be illegal to inject yourself or someone else
> with it...)
......For people, IMHO it would make much more sense to ensure a clean
drinking water supply for those that need it! As for the same vax for dogs
and people, there's a MUCH higher requirement WRT *risk*, when developing
any kind of drug or vaccine for people.
> This is what made me think about it for the old dog. His immune system may
> be going downhill a bit (he is older after all), and anything I can do to
> boulster it up might help...
.........And all the more reason to believe that at this point he's immune
to Giardia. Better to focus on good food and maybe some anti-oxidants in
his old age. And above all make sure the gut is in good shape, as a healthy
mucosal lining and the presence of good bacteria will hinder getting
something like Giardia more than anything else you can do. Toss some eggs
and sardines in his bowl a few times a week. Any transitory diarrhea I
treat with probiotics for a few days.
> I'll have to look some more at that. Some things I read suggested that it
> prevented infection, and other things I read suggested that helped control
> the infection, and yet another article I read suggested that it didn't do
> squat for already infected dogs...
............You need to read the whole paper, there's sometimes a huge
disconnect between what the abstract says and the paper proves. I read a
study on that once - it was more than 10% I think. Since you have access
via a university, this shouldn't be a problem.
buglady
take out the dog before replying
Dale Atkin - 18 Aug 2006 18:09 GMT
> I think I'm probably in a higher risk group than most due to the
>> amount I take my dogs out in to the woods with me, and the amount they
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> and haven't been suffering from bouts of diarrhea, then they're probably
> immune. Nature has a way of taking care of a lot of these things!
Well the old guy probably wasn't exposed much when he was younger (I've only
had him since last November), so he might not be. The old guy actually has
been suffering to loose stool and occaisional bout of diarrhea (along with
cramps), probably a totally seperate issue, but it does make you wonder. Put
him on a probiotic for a while (Eagle Pack's powder stuff), and it just made
it worse. Took him off the powder, then he seemed to get better (although
his stool does look fairly loose on occaision).
> Apparently my genetics
>> prof knew the folks who came up with the giardia vaccine. They apparently
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> and people, there's a MUCH higher requirement WRT *risk*, when developing
> any kind of drug or vaccine for people.
True enough, I think the key thing that my prof was getting at was that the
researchers felt they could satisfy the risk requirements for the people,
but they didn't have the $$$ to prove that they could satisfy the risk
requirements.
>> I'll have to look some more at that. Some things I read suggested that it
>> prevented infection, and other things I read suggested that helped
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> study on that once - it was more than 10% I think. Since you have access
> via a university, this shouldn't be a problem.
I think the big problem was, for starters they weren't all journal articles,
but more to the point they were from very diferent dates, some of the
articles seemed to be written in response to what some of the others were
saying (i.e. a more detailed study). I'll have a better look around when I
get the chance (for now I'm busy studying for my cell biology final on
saturday, in fact I should be doing that rather than reading usenet....)
> buglady
> take out the dog before replying
Dale
toucanldy@aol.com - 18 Aug 2006 19:02 GMT
> Well the old guy probably wasn't exposed much when he was younger (I've only
> had him since last November), so he might not be. The old guy actually has
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> it worse. Took him off the powder, then he seemed to get better (although
> his stool does look fairly loose on occaision).
Maybe it's bouts of pancreatitis, and some digestive enzymes might
help.
Regards