Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Mammals
FerretsGuinea PigsHamstersRabbitsRats
Aquaria
GeneralMarine ReefFreshwaterPlantsCichlidsGoldfish
Birds
BirdsParrots
Miscellaneous
Animal HealthPet Loss
PetKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Pet Forum / Miscellaneous / Animal Health / November 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

rabies vaccinated cat: can it still be rabid?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
windwatcher - 08 Nov 2006 12:46 GMT
My cat Jack jumped in my lap last night for affection.  While I was
petting him he sunk his teeth into my hand and wouldn't let go.  I
soaked my hand in salt water: about 3/8 inch deep puncture wounds.  He
has been rehabilitated from a car accident and we got him several
months ago from the city animal pound where they were going to put him
to sleep because no one wanted him.  He has major balance problems and
is overly sensitive to stimulation.  He has very likely had his rabies
shot within the past year since we adopted him after a few months at
the pound: will call to confirm this and the dates when the city opens.
We don't know his other history since no one knows who he belonged to
before the car accident. I don't want the remedial shots because I know
there are bad reactions and I have major allergies.  Guillaune Barre
syndrome is not unknown from people who have received the rabies shots
recommended for all who have been bitten and the list of possible long
term reactions down the road is unknown.  I would rather not have to
kill the cat to find out.  I am under the impression that a cat
vaccinated for rabies is unlikely to have rabies(percentage wise, is it
100 percent?) but have also read that it can take two years for a cat
to show symptoms and die if it has rabiesl.  I don't want to risk my
life for the cat.  Does anyone have an educated opinion on my
situation. I need to know quickly as I have to make the decision to get
the anti-rabies treatments within two weeks at the outmost. I know also
that animal control won't take any chances and my cat is dead if I
report it. Thanks in advance; appreciate advice.
diddy - 08 Nov 2006 12:49 GMT
in thread news:1162989964.990786.201570@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
"windwatcher" <stoye@mac.com> whittled the following words:

> My cat Jack jumped in my lap last night for affection.  While I was
> petting him he sunk his teeth into my hand and wouldn't let go.  I
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> that animal control won't take any chances and my cat is dead if I
> report it. Thanks in advance; appreciate advice.

If you think you have a chance of being exposed, all this diatribe is for
naught. Get thee to a doctor and get this sussed out. Rabies is 100% fatal.
It's not something to risk thinking about.
Sharon Too - 08 Nov 2006 13:29 GMT
> If you think you have a chance of being exposed, all this diatribe is for
> naught. Get thee to a doctor and get this sussed out. Rabies is 100%
> fatal.
> It's not something to risk thinking about.

Also - bacterial infections from cat bites is common. So as you get the
rabies vaccination figured out, make sure you get treated with antibiotics
for that bite wound.
Michael A. Ball - 08 Nov 2006 23:37 GMT
>My cat Jack jumped in my lap last night for affection.  While I was
>petting him he sunk his teeth into my hand and wouldn't let go.

Have you ever heard of a "Darwin Award"? No matter. It doesn't make
sense to keep a pet for "several months" without certainty the animal
has been vaccinated against rabies. A rabies vaccination should be among
the very first acts of love we perform for an adult pet; not to mention
it is required by law.

Things might be different where you live, but around here, Rabies
vaccinations have to be administered by a veterinarian--and *very* few
shelters have that luxury.

I hope you mend quickly.

________________________
Experience is something you don't get--until just after you need it.
windwatcher - 09 Nov 2006 12:16 GMT
Jack was vaccinated in February, and no one has an answer to my real
question: is there any possibility he could have had rabies from
earlier; sometimes symptoms take two years to develop.

> >My cat Jack jumped in my lap last night for affection.  While I was
> >petting him he sunk his teeth into my hand and wouldn't let go.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> ________________________
> Experience is something you don't get--until just after you need it.
Deborah, DVM - 09 Nov 2006 12:43 GMT
> Jack was vaccinated in February, and no one has an answer to my real
> question: is there any possibility he could have had rabies from
> earlier; sometimes symptoms take two years to develop.

2 yrs?  Never heard that figure.  6 months max to my knowledge.  I would
think that the risk is quite low, unless you know for a fact that he'd been
exposed to a raccoon or fox or bat or other known rabies reservoir.  And if
he's vaccinated, then reporting the bite is NOT a death sentence.  Standard
protocol for a vaccinated animal calls for a 10 day quarantine (which often
can be done at home).  And as another poster replied, you better see a
doctor for antibiotics, because cat bites to the hand have a nasty way of
getting severely infected.  I've known several people who wound up
hospitalized from cat bites on the hand.

Deborah, DVM
buglady - 09 Nov 2006 13:38 GMT
.  And if
> he's vaccinated, then reporting the bite is NOT a death sentence.  Standard
> protocol for a vaccinated animal calls for a 10 day quarantine

.......Dr. Deb, I wonder, despite the Rabies Compendium suggesting a
standard protocol, if all states/counties adhere to this philosophy.  Reason
would tell you that since this cat was vaxxed months ago, he's probably
protected, but I think that some areas of high rabies might have a different
take on this.  After all, it was only last Jan that the state of FL made
counties recognize that a 3 yr vax lasts 3 yrs.  Our county was one that
required yearly vaccination, still may be for all I know, only now they are
forced to recognize that a dog vaxxed every 3 yrs with a 3 yr vax is not
considred unvaccinated.

.......so to the OP, check your county regs WRT this situation.  Your state
law may say one thing, the county another.  Rabies laws are human public
health issues.  They figure if there's any chance at all of rabies being
contracted, better to kill the animal.

buglady
take out the dog before replying
Deborah, DVM - 09 Nov 2006 19:29 GMT
> .......Dr. Deb, I wonder, despite the Rabies Compendium suggesting a
> standard protocol, if all states/counties adhere to this philosophy.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> forced to recognize that a dog vaxxed every 3 yrs with a 3 yr vax is not
> considred unvaccinated.

I hate that Florida passed that law :-(.  It confused things here to no end.
Our county used to require annual rabies vaccination (good idea I thought --  
we had a positive HORSE of all things 2 yrs ago just up the road from our
clinic).  Now they are forced to honor a 3 yr vaccine -- some clinics are
only doing 3 yr vaccines, some (like us) offer it but still recommend
annual.  And the county can't make up it's mind -- for a while they were
saying that you had to give the 3 yr vaccine once, have it only be good for
1 yr, then the second time it would be good for 3 yrs.  But that's not how
the vaccine is labeled -- it is true that an animal's first rabies vaccine
is only good for 1 yr, but it doesn't matter which vaccine was given, just
that they were given a shot!  People get confused -- after we've done shots,
then they ask "so he's good for 3 yrs?" and we have to say, no, we gave a 1
yr.  And the standard in this area because of concern over losing income was
to charge 3 times as much for the 3 yr rabies vs the 1 yr rabies.  So now
those pets whom I preferred to only vaccinate every 3 yrs for health reasons
are having to pay the price (literally) -- and some owners don't like it.
Oh well.

Deborah, DVM
Sharon Too - 09 Nov 2006 19:36 GMT
>And the standard in this area because of concern over losing income was to
>charge 3 times as much for the 3 yr rabies vs the 1 yr rabies.  So now
>those pets whom I preferred to only vaccinate every 3 yrs for health
>reasons are having to pay the price (literally) -- and some owners don't
>like it. Oh well.

So at your practice, or others, you charge three times the fee for the
rabies vaccination when it comes due in 3 years? Our state requires the 1/3
protocol (first vac good one year, then q 3 after that). I've never heard of
charging 3 times the rate because it's a 3 year vaccine.

-Sharon
Deborah, DVM - 09 Nov 2006 19:42 GMT
> >And the standard in this area because of concern over losing income was
> >to charge 3 times as much for the 3 yr rabies vs the 1 yr rabies.  So now
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> -Sharon

Pretty much.  Not my decision, and I have mixed feelings.  I think it's
partly just to avoid income loss, but at least partly it's also to
discourage people with a lot of hunting dogs from only vaccinating every
three years.  We do see rabies in this area, and I don't think that hunting
dogs (who are at high risk of exposure) should get 3 yr vaccines.
Unfortunately most of these owners only vaccinate them at all because the
law says they have to, and they want to do it as cheaply as possible.  If
they could only get shots every 3 yrs, for the same price, they would!
(we're talking people with 20-30 dogs, not your average pet owner).  The 3
yr vaccine is more expensive, but not that much.

Deborah, DVM
buglady - 09 Nov 2006 20:38 GMT
> I hate that Florida passed that law :-(.  It confused things here to no end.
> Our county used to require annual rabies vaccination (good idea I thought --
> we had a positive HORSE of all things 2 yrs ago just up the road from our
> clinic).  Now they are forced to honor a 3 yr vaccine

...............Requiring me to vaccinate my dogs every year will NOT help
get those unvaccinated dogs in for a shot!  Nor will it, if they are fully
immunized, actually do ANYTHING to boost their immunity.  AND it may cause
them harm.  So for our state to finally come out of the dark ages and make
the counties recognize that a 3 yr shot lasts 3 yrs (when in all reality it
may last as long as 7 years), is nothing but good, AFAIC.

.........I'm not surprised a horse came up positive - probably bats.

People get confused -- after we've done shots,
> then they ask "so he's good for 3 yrs?" and we have to say, no, we gave a 1
> yr.

......my suggestion is to get a little sheet printed up explaining the
situation.  There's never been any difference in a 1 yr and 3 yr (for dogs
at least) anyway, so now you actually have to talk about it.

And the standard in this area because of concern over losing income was
> to charge 3 times as much for the 3 yr rabies vs the 1 yr rabies.

.........oh cripes, that's usurious.  If a vet's income depends on giving a
dog a totally unnecessary vaccination year after year, then, well, I don't
know what to say that's actually publishable.............that would be time
for me to look for another vet.  And I can't think of a better way to
discourage people with a lot of dogs from coming in for vaccinations.
Somehow I expected more from your boss, who I've come to admire over the
years.

buglady
take out the dog before replying
kate - 09 Nov 2006 21:55 GMT
>>.......Dr. Deb, I wonder, despite the Rabies Compendium suggesting a
>>standard protocol, if all states/counties adhere to this philosophy.
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> are having to pay the price (literally) -- and some owners don't like it.
> Oh well.

Apparently TN has passed that law as well. From what my vet told me my
understanding is that the dogs don't need the shots every year, but they
do have to get a new rabies tag yearly.

Kate - I could be wrong
John Hasler - 10 Nov 2006 01:42 GMT
> I hate that Florida passed that law :-(.  It confused things here to no
> end.  Our county used to require annual rabies vaccination (good idea I
> thought -- we had a positive HORSE of all things 2 yrs ago just up the
> road from our clinic).

Not all _that_ rare.  We've had several cases of rabies in horses in this
county over the last fifteen years.
Signature

John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA

buglady - 10 Nov 2006 12:59 GMT
> Not all _that_ rare.  We've had several cases of rabies in horses in this
> county over the last fifteen years.

..............from bats?   Or don't they know?

buglady
take out the dog before replying
John Hasler - 10 Nov 2006 15:16 GMT
I wrote:
> Not all _that_ rare.  We've had several cases of rabies in horses in this
> county over the last fifteen years.

> from bats?

Skunks, most likely, but of course it's hard to know for sure.
Signature

John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA

Susan (CobbersMom) - 10 Nov 2006 16:55 GMT
"John Hasler" <> wrote in message>> Not all _that_ rare.  We've had several
cases of rabies in horses in this>> county over the last fifteen years.

> "buglady" <> wrote in message >
> ..............from bats?   Or don't they know?

A number of years ago when I was involved with wildlife rehab and attended
some state conferences, there was discussion of rabies in domestic farm
animals.  Last I remember, more cows and horses in Wisconsin contracted
rabies than pets.  Reason being, the cow or horse would walk up to a skunk
in the field (out of curiosity) and get bit in the face/nose.
Couldn't find any documentation from recently but I doubt it's changed much.
Sue
Minocqua, WI
Yamaha '00 VStar 650
             '04 TW200 (mud = fun)
Kawasaki '95 Vulcan 1500  V#15937

"Do what you want and say what you feel because those that  mind, don't
matter and those that matter, don't mind". ~Dr. Seuss
buglady - 10 Nov 2006 20:17 GMT
Last I remember, more cows and horses in Wisconsin contracted
> rabies than pets.  Reason being, the cow or horse would walk up to a skunk
> in the field (out of curiosity) and get bit in the face/nose.

........huh - interesting!  I can't imagine a cat wanting to tangle with a
skunk, but don't think most dogs would pass up investigating one.

buglady
take out the dog before replying
John Hasler - 10 Nov 2006 21:05 GMT
> I can't imagine a cat wanting to tangle with a skunk, but don't think
> most dogs would pass up investigating one.

Most dogs are vaccinated.  Most cows and horses are, unfortunately, not.
Many people seem to think that only dogs and cats (and people) can get
rabies.
Signature

John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA

windwatcher - 09 Nov 2006 13:48 GMT
> > Jack was vaccinated in February, and no one has an answer to my real
> > question: is there any possibility he could have had rabies from
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Deborah, DVM

http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvrd/rabies/natural_history/nathist.htm
After uptake into peripheral nerves, rabies virus is transported to the
central nervous system (CNS) via retrograde axoplasmic flow. Typically
this occurs via sensory and motor nerves at the initial site of
infection. The incubation period (see figure, number 4) is the time
from exposure to onset of clinical signs of disease. The incubation
period may vary from a few days to several years, but is typically 1 to
3 months.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra
ct&list_uids=10319881

about side effects of the semper rabies vaccine
Deborah, DVM - 09 Nov 2006 19:18 GMT
> http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvrd/rabies/natural_history/nathist.htm
> After uptake into peripheral nerves, rabies virus is transported to the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> period may vary from a few days to several years, but is typically 1 to
> 3 months.

Okay, we're talking about two different things.  Yes, it's true that an
animal can take a long time to show signs of rabies.  But during that
"pre-clinical" phase they are *not* infectious.  Once the virus is in the
salivary system (and hence able to be spread), most animals will be dead
within 10 days (see your referenced article).  The 6 month period I
mentioned is the typical time for an animal to start showing signs of
clinical disease once exposed to a rabid animal.  Sorry if I'm confusing
today, not a lot of sleep last night!

Deborah, DVM
windwatcher - 09 Nov 2006 20:41 GMT
> > http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvrd/rabies/natural_history/nathist.htm
> > After uptake into peripheral nerves, rabies virus is transported to the
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Deborah, DVM

I had been sick with worry over this and also losing sleep with the
hand having awful pain until today when I last soaked it again (first
day was every hour or two) was not bad at all.  Jack had jumped into my
lap for a cuddle and within a minute sunk his teeth into my hand and
wouldn't let go.  I did not realize this had happened to my hubby a
month or so ago (I wish I knew exactly) until after posting my worries
here.  He said he was also surprised and that his hand was also not
released immediately.  He stayed limp until Jack let go and didn't
worry about it nor feel it worth telling me about.  I feel rather
foolish about how it's a big deal for me that I got this terrible bite
since, he is still alive and well of course six months isn't up yet and
he could still come down with it.  So I will continue soaking it a few
times a day for another day or two and thinking about whether the
treatment with the vaccine would be worth the risk; maybe call my
doctor and ask her but would likely get the "legally correct" answer
rather than her best medical opinion. Thanks much.
Sharon Too - 09 Nov 2006 20:47 GMT
>So I will continue soaking it a few
> times a day for another day or two and thinking about whether the
> treatment with the vaccine would be worth the risk; maybe call my
> doctor and ask her but would likely get the "legally correct" answer
> rather than her best medical opinion. Thanks much.

If you think that a doctor will play games with you when you are sitting
around with an old cat bite wound on your hand, then gear up and sue for
malpractice. If the cat was vaccinated and you have that certificate, you
have nothing to worry about. But bacterial infections from cate bites can be
serious. *Very serious*. Those long teeth sink in and cause puncture wounds
and the bacteria from the mouth is left behind deep in the tissue. Every day
you wait to get treatment you put tourself more at risk for an infection
spreading and possibly causing sepsis.
idontmind@gmail.com - 15 Nov 2006 08:45 GMT
> I had been sick with worry over this and also losing sleep with the
> hand having awful pain until today when I last soaked it again (first
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> doctor and ask her but would likely get the "legally correct" answer
> rather than her best medical opinion. Thanks much.

If the bite is infected, you want to soak it  3-4 times a day in HOT
salt water to draw out the infection.  You also want to see a doc asap
for some antibiotics - you could lose your hand, and I am *not*
kidding.  Call the doctor as soon as you can.

-L.
buglady - 09 Nov 2006 13:30 GMT
> Jack was vaccinated in February, and no one has an answer to my real
> question: is there any possibility he could have had rabies from
> earlier; sometimes symptoms take two years to develop.

.........While I feel for your situation, I don't know how anyone can answer
your question.  Apparently rabies can take a long time to show up.  How
often that happens I don't know.  And any professional person you ask isn't
going to be willing to tell you not to get a rabies vax.  For you, with your
health problems, it's a risk either way.

.......How long has it been since you got bit?  The CDC site mentions this
is not an emergency situation but an urgent one.

A few links:
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs099/en/
The most effective mechanism of protection against rabies is to wash and
flush a wound or point of contact with soap and water, detergent or plain
water, followed by the application of ethanol, tincture or aqueous solution
of iodine. Anti-rabies vaccine should be given for Category II and III1
exposures as soon as possible according to WHO recognized regimens.
Anti-rabies immunoglobulin (antibody) should be applied for all Category III
exposures and for Category II exposures in immunosuppressed patients.

In case of human exposure to animals that are suspected of having rabies,
immediate attempts should be made to identify, capture or kill the animal
involved. In case of a Category III exposure, post-exposure treatment should
start immediately and can be stopped if the animal is a dog or cat and
remains healthy after 10 days.

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00056176.htm
A currently vaccinated dog, cat, or ferret is unlikely to become infected
with rabies (68-71).

.........This phone number is for professionals, apparently not for victims.
I think you need to sit down with your primary care physician and talk this
through and if he/she has any questions they should call.  If you just get a
knee jerk reaction to kill the cat and find out if it has rabies, or to just
get the shot regardless, you need to find someone else to talk to.
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvrd/rabies/Professional/professi.htm
Clinician Information Line
Physicians, nurses, pharmacists, veterinarians, and health officers who have
questions about rabies or rabies prophylaxis can now call 877-554-4625 24
hours a day, 7 days a week for immediate answers.

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5403a1.htm
Within 28 days after primary vaccination, a peak rabies antibody titer is
reached and the animal can be considered immunized. An animal is currently
vaccinated and is considered immunized if the primary vaccination was
administered at least 28 days previously and vaccinations have been
administered in accordance with this compendium.

a. Dogs, Cats, and Ferrets. Rabies virus may be excreted in the saliva of
infected dogs, cats, and ferrets during illness and/or for only a few days
prior to illness or death (19--21). A healthy dog, cat, or ferret that bites
a person should be confined and observed daily for 10 days (22);
administration of rabies vaccine to the animal is not recommended during the
observation period to avoid confusing signs of rabies with possible side
effects of vaccine administration. Such animals should be evaluated by a
veterinarian at the first sign of illness during confinement. Any illness in
the animal should be reported immediately to the local health department. If
signs suggestive of rabies develop, the animal should be euthanized and the
head shipped for testing as described in Part I.A.7. Any stray or unwanted
dog, cat, or ferret that bites a person may be euthanized immediately and
the head submitted for rabies examination.

........Dogs and cats are vaccinated repeatedly for rabies.  However, if the
animal is immunologically competent and not too young, only one vax is
necessary.  The first vax, followed by a booster a year later (in case the
animal did not seroconvert with the first one or if it was a bad batch of
vax) is really all that's necessary to immunize an animal for rabies.  Hence
the *word on the street* is that any healthy animal (at the time of the vax)
with two rabies vaccinations is sufficiently immunized - for life.  The
second shot is just security.  So, can you get talk to the shelter and look
at the records and see if this cat was in fairly good shape when they took
him in?  If so, then the rabies vax probably *took* and the cat is
considered immunized.  There is no way to prove this, but the chances of
this cat having rabies is very very slim.  Note that the saliva of the
animal only carries the rabies virus shortly before frank illness/or death.

............Talk to your vet.  Talk to your doctor.  Keep reading.

buglady
take out the dog before replying
windwatcher - 09 Nov 2006 12:18 GMT
> I hope you mend quickly.

BTW Thanks for the best wishes; soaking it in epsom salts and betadine
and it's healing well. The vet who rescued him vaccinated him; she
thinks it is neurological results from the car accident.
windwatcher - 09 Nov 2006 14:05 GMT
I have misinterpreted my vet. she did not say that it's probably
neurological. We do know for a fact that he is easily overstimulated
and in fact has bit my husband a month or so ago but he had been in the
military in 1965 and may have been vaccinated at that time (will be
checking).  So there are actually two people bitten by poor little
Jack.  I got bit less than two days ago.  Jack has a kind of
schizophrenia around some of my other cats who he believes are
attacking him. We knew when we got him that he had side effects from
the accident and still want to keep him even though he has problems.
The vet said I might get the rabies vaccines if I'm worried.  My
concern now is I'm willing to go for the vaccine if the consensus is
that there is really a risk of rabies which of course cannot be
answered I see now so I shouldn't have posted it because no one is able
to give a definitive answer not knowing the cat, etc who is totally
indoors and won't leave our cellar. That there may be long term side
effects with the vaccine schedule for me and that I'm already on
corticosteroid inhaler for asthma wories me. Based on what I hear I
need to make a decision within a week or two but I'm leaning towards
not getting the prophylaxis. The vaccine is probably not the one they
used in 1999 the semper vaccine with the 1 in 122 people having
terrible long term immune system reactions but I havent read or heard a
real answer yet as to what they use now as vaccine and immuno.  I guess
that is my question now: does anyone know on this group or can offer a
link?  Medscape talks about the vaccine but I don't know what I'm
reading: too complicated for lay people to understand. Could it be the
semper vaccine under a new name with basically the same basis?  Long
term immune disease is not to be taken lightly.  Thank you for offering
your advice because I do appreciate it.  Wasn't sure I made that clear.
Thanks to all.
Michael A. Ball - 09 Nov 2006 15:27 GMT
>I have misinterpreted my vet... My
>concern now is I'm willing to go for the vaccine if the consensus is
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>your advice because I do appreciate it.  Wasn't sure I made that clear.
>Thanks to all.

And I have apparently misunderstood you. I'm sorry. Initially, you said,
"He has very likely had his rabies shot within the past year since we
adopted him after a few months at the pound: will call to confirm this
and the dates when the city opens." Today, I see "Jack was vaccinated in
February..."

This has become a thread that I definitely will keep for reference. But
I can't help wondering if you aren't making your concern more complex
than it needs to be. Jack was vaccinated in February (2006?). Seeing
that he didn't die or get sick, etc., the shot probably did no harm, but
did begin protecting him--and you. Are there exceptions? Yes. Heck, even
HeartGard isn't 100% reliable; but I can't worry myself sick over the
protection I *believe* I'm providing to my dogs.

From what I'm reading here, no one is foolish enough to say you are
totally safe, but no one seems to be advocating your taking the
counter-rabies treatment. Someone stated that you can start the
treatment, and stop, if the cat is determined to be safe. I'm certainly
no authority, and I note the possibility of exceptions, but millions of
cats owners would consider Jack safe and you, too.

You can go blind reading support material, and go batty fretting over
the risk, or you can trust the vaccination Jack received in February. Is
the issue any more complicated than that?

How does Jack's balance problem manifest itself? Does he always land on
his feet? Is it possible, in either bite case, your cat believed he was
falling, and bit in order to save himself? Is there any chance at all
that your cat was playing with you or your husband, when he bit either
of you?

I don't appreciate cats, but I love dogs. My Chow Chow, Tang, came from
the shelter; and I cherish him. He sometimes bites me, when we are
playing, and I love it! Even accidental bites are fine. However, if he
were to try to harm me, as your cat appears to have done, I'd make Tang
believe the end of time was at hand.

You seem disappointed that no definitive answer was available, but I'm
glad you understand why. Some truly learned and caring people, who I
count on, responded to your post.

Good luck with Jack. We never know what shelter animals have
endured--before reaching the shelter.

________________________
"...Other people are weird, but sometimes they have candy,
so it's best to try to get along with them." Joe Bay
Sharon Too - 09 Nov 2006 19:38 GMT
> We do know for a fact that he is easily overstimulated
> and in fact has bit my husband a month or so ago but he had been in the
> military in 1965 and may have been vaccinated at that time (will be
> checking).

He needs to have a titer done to see if he even has any immunity after all
these years. Our employees have the preventive vaccinations then have titers
done every 2-3 years. I doubt one series in 1965 would still hold up.
kate - 09 Nov 2006 14:43 GMT
> Things might be different where you live, but around here, Rabies
> vaccinations have to be administered by a veterinarian--and *very* few
> shelters have that luxury.

I'm in Nashville, TN and neither the shelter or the pound will adopt out
an animal that hasn't had a rabies vaccination. Perhaps a rescue might,
but not one that is reputable.

Peace,

Kate
Michael A. Ball - 09 Nov 2006 15:55 GMT
>> Things might be different where you live, but around here, Rabies
>> vaccinations have to be administered by a veterinarian--and *very* few
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>an animal that hasn't had a rabies vaccination. Perhaps a rescue might,
>but not one that is reputable.

[I'm in Johnson City, TN; northeast tip.] I suppose that's wonderful,
but how do they manage that? Does each facility have a vet present
during adoption hours? If so, that's fabulous! I really wish the shelter
here could afford that! Are exceptions made for younger puppies, of a
certain age?

I have noticed, in the past three months or so, the shelter staff
informing adopters that "the vet will charge you for a rabies shot, when
you pick up your dog." So, there is some effort to assure rabies
protection, but nothing close to what Nashville has.

___________________
A dog's life is too short; their only fault really.
kate - 09 Nov 2006 21:51 GMT
>>>Things might be different where you live, but around here, Rabies
>>>vaccinations have to be administered by a veterinarian--and *very* few
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> here could afford that! Are exceptions made for younger puppies, of a
> certain age?

Nashville Humane has a vet on staff as does Animal Control. The dogs and
cats for adoption at NHA are spayed/neutered and given all shots prior
to being put up for adoption, I believe (although I seem to remember
something weird about the rabies shots.) Animal Control does the
vaccinations, including rabies, but doesn't neuter/spay until after the
adoption as they aren't no kill - you come back the next day after the
surgery for the pet.

We've only rescued one puppy and yes, we had the rabies, other shots and
neutering done later.

Kate
http://www.emmylou.net/br.html
(dogs we've rescued)
Sharon Too - 09 Nov 2006 19:41 GMT
> I'm in Nashville, TN and neither the shelter or the pound will adopt out
> an animal that hasn't had a rabies vaccination. Perhaps a rescue might,
> but not one that is reputable.

Ditto in my area of the northeast (at least with pets over 12 weeks of age
which is the minimum age for rabies). Our county shelter has a vet on staff.
The other two humane groups we deal with work closely with all vets in our
area to provide the vaccinations and spaying/neutering.

Of course, today our day was busted by a tiny puppy with parvo bought at a
mall pet store. :-(
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.