Butch is an adult, male Rottweiller at the shelter. A man wanted to
adopt him today. When the man revealed that he wanted to have Butch's
tail amputated during his neuter, the shelter staff scrambled to
discourage the amputation and invoked a home check before finalizing the
adoption.
Aside from unnecessary suffering, what other medical reasons exist to
oppose the cosmetic tail amputation?
Thank you.
__________________________
When I count my blessings, I count my dog twice.
> Butch is an adult, male Rottweiller at the shelter. A man wanted to
> adopt him today. When the man revealed that he wanted to have Butch's
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Aside from unnecessary suffering, what other medical reasons exist to
> oppose the cosmetic tail amputation?
......No matter what they say, they'll do what they want once the animal is
in their possession. I adopted out a kitten to people who promised not to
declaw her, then they did it anyway.
.....The only thing you can do is have a policy and consequences for
violating the policy. Even then, how do you enforce it? Will vets in the
area comply with this request? Some don't do tail docking.
buglady
take out the dog before replying
Michael A. Ball - 04 Feb 2007 17:09 GMT
>"Michael A. Ball" <Guardian@wireco.net> wrote in message
...
>> Aside from unnecessary suffering, what other medical reasons exist to
>> oppose the cosmetic tail amputation?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>violating the policy. Even then, how do you enforce it? Will vets in the
>area comply with this request? Some don't do tail docking.
Yes, enforcement of a policy would be tough; especially seeing how hard
it is to enforce an adoption contract--even when the adopter has paid
for the spay/neuter in advance.
The Rottwieller was gone the next day. :-( The vet doing his neuter had
priced the tail amputation at $53.00, if done at the time of the neuter.
I'm not sure how many local vets would be willing to amputate a healthy
tail, on request.
I've read that certain powerful tail waggers have their tails docked so
they won't injure themselves by banging it into things. I can barely
accept that, but I can't accept tail amputation for cosmetic reasons at
all.
________________________
Whatever it takes.
Dale Atkin - 05 Feb 2007 20:40 GMT
> I've read that certain powerful tail waggers have their tails docked so
> they won't injure themselves by banging it into things. I can barely
> accept that, but I can't accept tail amputation for cosmetic reasons at
> all.
It can sometimes be necessary. My older guy actually fractured his tail,
on the chain link run they had him in at the shelter. If he hadn't been
able to find a foster home (me), they were talking about the necessity
of amputation.
Dale
Ebbtide - 05 Feb 2007 23:31 GMT
>> I've read that certain powerful tail waggers have their tails docked so
>> they won't injure themselves by banging it into things. I can barely
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Dale
oh, you sound like a wonderful owner.
Dale Atkin - 06 Feb 2007 00:06 GMT
>>> I've read that certain powerful tail waggers have their tails docked so
>>> they won't injure themselves by banging it into things. I can barely
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> oh, you sound like a wonderful owner.
Was that meant to be sarcasm? I can't tell for sure. I'd say I'm a
pretty darned good dog owner myself, but I don't see what this has to do
with what I wrote above.
Dale