> To be honest I'm not totally sure I've been given the entire story. I
> e-mailed a guy in the Alberta government who is responsible for information
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> but the source is reputable, so is probably true), all species of rat are
> also illegal.
.........you need to see law on that to believe it. Sounds totally
ridiculous to me. What exactly is a S/N rat going to do? Eat all the grain
crops in Canada? Go out and purchsee new testicles so they can breed? Or
are they worried about rabies? Better start killing off all the wildlife
capable of catching rabies.......oh and cows too. I'd be really interested
in the year this law was enacted - liable to be back in the dark ages. OK
to keep ferrets in Canada?
> 2. The law says that illegal rats have to be relocated or destroyed.
> 3. There was nothing in the e-mail he sent me about who would actually be
> euthanizing the animal, but they expect a vet to report any cases of rats
> being brought in.
........they can expect anything they want, but is it a legal requirement
that they do so?
buglady
take out the dog before replying
Dale Atkin - 27 Apr 2007 15:17 GMT
>> To be honest I'm not totally sure I've been given the entire story. I
>> e-mailed a guy in the Alberta government who is responsible for
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> also illegal.
> .........you need to see law on that to believe it.
I've been looking... I haven't been able to find a copy of it (which is why
I e-mailed to ask)
> Sounds totally
> ridiculous to me. What exactly is a S/N rat going to do? Eat all the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> interested
> in the year this law was enacted - liable to be back in the dark ages.
I think its roughly 1950s ish.
>OK
> to keep ferrets in Canada?
Yep. Its also Ok to keep rats in most of Canada, just not Alberta.
>> 2. The law says that illegal rats have to be relocated or destroyed.
>> 3. There was nothing in the e-mail he sent me about who would actually be
>> euthanizing the animal, but they expect a vet to report any cases of rats
>> being brought in.
> ........they can expect anything they want, but is it a legal requirement
> that they do so?
You know I'm not sure... I think I'll e-mail the Alberta Veterinary Medicine
Association. They've probably got a better idea.
> buglady
> take out the dog before replying
buglady - 29 Apr 2007 12:44 GMT
> > ........they can expect anything they want, but is it a legal requirement
> > that they do so?
>
> You know I'm not sure... I think I'll e-mail the Alberta Veterinary Medicine
> Association. They've probably got a better idea.
Dale, go read this for one vet's viewpoint on these kind of issues:
http://tinyurl.com/2bbdof
buglady
take out the dog before replying
> What I suspect (although this wasn't what I was told, but seems to make
> the most sense given the new information I have) is that the vet told the
> client the law, and said the animal will have to be relocated or seized
> and detroyed, and they said essentially "Ok destroy it then".
That's different. I had the impression that the vet took it upon himself
to destroy the rat.

Signature
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA