> My wife purchased TriForce from a locally-operated "Feed, Garden & Pet
> Supply" store because it was about 1/3 less expensive than Frontline.
> When I returned the product this morning, the manager seemed alarmed to
> hear the report of problems caused by it.
I wrote:
>What problems did you have with it?
> I didn't have any problems because I didn't even open the package. But
> Deborah reported (in this thread) that she saw "three dogs with bad
> reactions to in the last 2 weeks
So the problem was that you heard a rumor.

Signature
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
Deborah, DVM - 25 Jul 2007 12:25 GMT
> So the problem was that you heard a rumor.
I take a little bit of exception to having my statements be called a rumor
;-). I'm the first one to tell people not to believe everything they read
on the internet, but I think I've posted here enough that by now anyone who
reads this newsgroup with any regularity knows that I'm not likely to make
blanket statements without fairly strong support for my position. (and to
know that I like long, runon sentences LOL)
I do have significant concerns about this product, because I had never heard
of it until I had a dog come in who had lost almost all of his hair down his
entire back and had what looked like chemical burns within 2 days of having
it applied (maybe not the identical product, but something with those same
ingredients). Then within a 2 week period I had another dog come in with
signs of permethrin toxicity after using that product, then one more dog
with a nasty skin issue. None of which are ever issues with Frontline.
Deborah, DVM
John Hasler - 25 Jul 2007 12:59 GMT
> I take a little bit of exception to having my statements be called a rumor
The plural of anecdote is not data.

Signature
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
Bob Simon - 25 Jul 2007 13:23 GMT
>> I take a little bit of exception to having my statements be called a rumor
>
>The plural of anecdote is not data.
I came here looking for confirmation of safety and efficacy for a
product that I had never heard of. Anecdotal data to the contrary was
good enough for me to bypass this product in favor of one that I have
two years good experience with.
Bob
buglady - 25 Jul 2007 22:56 GMT
Anecdotal data to the contrary was
> good enough for me to bypass this product in favor of one that I have
> two years good experience with.
......amen. Best to stay away from new products anyway, as they're field
testing them for at least a year. BTW, John is our resident
curmudgeon......;-)
buglady
take out the dog before replying