> In 2001, there were 118,000 human cases of Salmonella
> enteridis in the US believed to be traceable to eggs.
> That's enough of a risk for me to avoid raw egg for
> handfed kittens.
.........In 2001 there were 284,796,887 people in the US. So that's
.00041% chance of getting Salmonella from raw eggs.
In 2001 there were 6,323,000 automobile traffic crashes in the USA. That's
a .02% chance of being in a crash. There were 3,075,000 injured or killed.
That's .011% of the population.
(Traffic Safety Facts Annual Report 2001)
http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-30/ncsa/AvailInf.html
Sounds like it's more dangerous to drive a car than eat a raw egg in your
nog! But of course it depends on driver competence, the conditions,
impairment from alcohol/poor vision, freeway or rural miles, etc. Sickness
from food also has important variables that are never mentioned. Is the
person immune compromised, on steroids or eating acid reducers with every
meal? Until the CDC asks and answers these questions, the statistics are
only a brief view of what is really going on.
It's all about perceived risk.
buglady
take out the dog before replying
Kay Lancaster - 03 Sep 2007 22:42 GMT
> "Kay Lancaster" <kay@hub.fern.com> wrote in message
>> That's enough of a risk for me to avoid raw egg for
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> meal? Until the CDC asks and answers these questions, the statistics are
> only a brief view of what is really going on.
Ah, but it's so easy to hold an egg at 140oF for 3.5 minutes*, or
buy shell-pasteurized eggs.
Why not reduce spend the extra effort on an animal with an immature
immune system?
*See Corriher's book "Cookwise" for more details.
Kay, who's had Salmonella thankyouverymuchneveragainplease