Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Mammals
FerretsGuinea PigsHamstersRabbitsRats
Aquaria
GeneralMarine ReefFreshwaterPlantsCichlidsGoldfish
Birds
BirdsParrots
Miscellaneous
Animal HealthPet Loss
PetKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Pet Forum / Miscellaneous / Animal Health / February 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Random calculations...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dale Atkin - 10 Feb 2008 18:33 GMT
So I'm procrastinating studying and running various numbers to see if I
could work out the origin behind some of the testing schedules for phenobarb
levels.

From
http://www.canine-epilepsy.com/Phenobarbital.html
Ideally trough levels should be taken 14, 45, 90 & and 180 days after
starting PB therapy and at least every 6 months thereafter.

According to various sources I've found online, the half life of phenobarb
in the body is between 53 and 118 hours (depending on the animal), and tends
to increase with prolonged use.

Lets start with the 14 day measure. At day 14, based on simple half life
calculations, the low half life value should give a 98.9% of the expected
long term concentrations. The longer half life value will give 87.1% of the
expected steady state levels.(if the half life is on the high end, the
expected concentration is
roughly twice the value for teh short half life scenario). Similar levels
are reached for the long half life case at about day 30.

At day 45, with simple half life calculations, the long half life scenario
reaches 99.94% of its expected long term concentation (interestingly, if we
assume the dosing my dog is getting...60mg twice a day) this is the exact
day where the number of circulating mgs reaches the correct 'integer' value.

Presumably the later tests will show how the dog is reacting to being on
phenobarb long term, and allow any adjustments to be made.

Dale
Rocky - 10 Feb 2008 19:08 GMT
"Dale Atkin" <labrador1@ibycus.com> said in
alt.med.veterinary:

> According to various sources I've found online, the half
> life of phenobarb in the body is between 53 and 118 hours
> (depending on the animal)

Generally accepted is 36 hours (maybe to be conservative) and
is why it's dosed at 12 hour intervals (one-third the half-
life) to even out the downs.

> and tends to increase with
> prolonged use.

That's interesting and new to me.

> Presumably the later tests will show how the dog is
> reacting to being on phenobarb long term, and allow any
> adjustments to be made.

Let's start at the beginning: describe exactly her symptoms
during her first observed seizure.  How long, frequency, did
she poo or pee, did she react to you?  Postictal is important,
too.  How quickly Rocky recovered from his seizures told me a
lot.

Signature

--Matt.  Rocky's a Dog.

Dale Atkin - 10 Feb 2008 21:51 GMT
> "Dale Atkin" <labrador1@ibycus.com> said in
> alt.med.veterinary:
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> is why it's dosed at 12 hour intervals (one-third the half-
> life) to even out the downs.

Interesting, the page I was looking at was a human one, so its possibly
different in dogs. The lower the half life, the lower the steady state
amount, but also the sooner 'steady state' is reached. So with a 36 hour
half life, 98% of the 'steady state' is reached at day 8.

>> and tends to increase with
>> prolonged use.
>
> That's interesting and new to me.

Heres a reference http://www.sdrl.com/druglist/phenobarbital.html

>> Presumably the later tests will show how the dog is
>> reacting to being on phenobarb long term, and allow any
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> too.  How quickly Rocky recovered from his seizures told me a
> lot.

First noticed any symptoms about a year ago. In retrospect what I saw then
was his first seizure, I didn't know it at the time, as I'd never seen a
seizure of any kind before, and blamed it on the cold weather. What I saw
was the following:
We were walking along down by Bearspaw dam, out past the end of the spill
way, when he stopped, and he seemed to all of a sudden go lame on his front
left leg. Attempts to get him to walk were met with stumbling. He was most
certainly aware of me, and seemed to calm down a bit as I spoke to him. I
picked him up and decided I was going to have to carry him back to the car.
Got a few feet, when I realized I was going to have to put him down to walk
down a fairly steep set of rocks. I put him down, and he was fine and ran
off happily like nothing had happend. The whole episode, start to finish
lasted about a 2-3 minutes.  (no pee, no poo)
I next noticed something about 6 months later. We were houseboating, he ran
off the boat, and up the beach  Similar kind of symptoms. I hugged him for a
while, and then he was all better. Over the coming months, his seizures got
more frequent, and culminated (I thought) with the vet finding some really
nasty arthritis in his front left elbow. Since the end of December, his
symptoms have mostly been going away. He's much better behaved at the park
than he had been, less grouchy etc, but while the incidence of his seizures
(recall I still didn't know they were seizures... they'd been more or less
assigned to shooting pain down his leg related to the arthritis) had
decreased, they still happend (about once a week on average now... prior to
the treatment for his elbow it was just about every other day). I was a
little concerned that they didn't seem to be correlated with when I'd expect
him to be in pain. They seemed more than anything to be correlated with
excitement than with exertion.
Well yesterday it happend while I was at the clinic. I'd brought him in with
me because he'd been having diarhea, and I didn't want to leave him alone in
the car for 4 hours unattended, and besides it was -30C. He'd barked a
couple of times in his kennel, and I obligingly took him out to poop. After
the second time, he was quite excited, and thats when he had his seizure.  I
called the vet out of an appointment to have a look, and he confirmed what
I'd been worried about, that they were seizures. I think that more or less
brings you up to speed. (Oh, the barking I don't think is correlated with
the onset of the seizure, I think it was more "I'm bored" than anything
else).

Dale

Dale
Dale Atkin - 11 Feb 2008 00:35 GMT
This looks like an interesting article. I'll have to pull up the complete
version sometime, but the abstract is certainly interesting.

http://avmajournals.avma.org/doi/abs/10.2460/javma.2000.217.200

Dale

> So I'm procrastinating studying and running various numbers to see if I
> could work out the origin behind some of the testing schedules for
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Dale
Rocky - 11 Feb 2008 03:37 GMT
"Dale Atkin" <labrador1@ibycus.com> said in
alt.med.veterinary:

> This looks like an interesting article. I'll have to pull
> up the complete version sometime, but the abstract is
> certainly interesting.
>
> http://avmajournals.avma.org/doi/abs/10.2460/javma.2000.217.
> 200

It is interesting.  Are we still talking about PB half-life?

I noticed that the article spoke to testing the PB level over a
relatively short period - the trough level tests didn't go
beyond the 6 hour mark.  Being a layman, I'm assuming that
trough refers to the lowest level.

I'm a big believer in going for whatever my trusted vet
suggests, and then--from there--bouncing ideas.

Signature

--Matt.  Rocky's a Dog.

Dale Atkin - 11 Feb 2008 04:59 GMT
> "Dale Atkin" <labrador1@ibycus.com> said in
> alt.med.veterinary:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> beyond the 6 hour mark.  Being a layman, I'm assuming that
> trough refers to the lowest level.

Yep. Thats exactly what through was refering to. Of particular interest is
"There is no therapeutically relevant change in serum phenobarbital
concentrations throughout a daily dosing interval in most epileptic dogs.
Therefore, timing is not important when collecting blood samples to measure
serum phenobarbital concentrations in most epileptic dogs treated long-term
with phenobarbital. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000;217:200-204)"

Basically what it is saying is that the time that you test the PB levels
doesn't really matter with respect to when you last gave the pill. 91% of
dogs fell within the same theraputic range independent of when the levels
were checked.

> I'm a big believer in going for whatever my trusted vet
> suggests, and then--from there--bouncing ideas.

I'm pretty much the same way, but I like to inform myself as much as
possible. (one thing I can say for Erwin, is he sure is educational :)).

Particularly what I'm trying to get a handle on (right now) is exactly how
sensitive the PB levels are to dose timing. For example, if I'm an hour
late, or an hour early, what impact will this have? Can I reconcile what
I've read and been told to known facts regarding the kinetics of the drug.
(I'm not planning on being late or early, but its always important to know
what the consequences are of a mistake)

Dale
Rocky - 11 Feb 2008 05:10 GMT
I wrote:

>> the trough level tests didn't go
>> beyond the 6 hour mark.

This was my main concern.

Signature

--Matt.  Rocky's a Dog.

Rocky - 11 Feb 2008 05:17 GMT
"Dale Atkin" <labrador1@ibycus.com> said in
alt.med.veterinary:

> Particularly what I'm trying to get a handle on (right now)
> is exactly how sensitive the PB levels are to dose timing.
> For example, if I'm an hour late, or an hour early, what
> impact will this have?

Some dogs are more reactive than others to off scheduled PB
doses.  The two most common alternatives are dividing the daily
dose into three or adding Pottasium Bromide to the mix - the
latter, especially, when cluster seizures are involved.

Signature

--Matt.  Rocky's a Dog.

Dale Atkin - 11 Feb 2008 01:33 GMT
Another interesting article...
http://grande.nal.usda.gov/ibids/index.php?mode2=detail&origin=ibids_references&
therow=156648


> So I'm procrastinating studying and running various numbers to see if I
> could work out the origin behind some of the testing schedules for
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Dale
Rocky - 11 Feb 2008 03:40 GMT
"Dale Atkin" <labrador1@ibycus.com> said in
alt.med.veterinary:

> Another interesting article...
> http://grande.nal.usda.gov/ibids/index.php?mode2=detail&orig
> in=ibids_references&therow=156648

How so?

Signature

--Matt.  Rocky's a Dog.

Dale Atkin - 11 Feb 2008 04:51 GMT
One thing I'm trying to get a handle on here is the kinetic of phenobarb in
the system, and the various influences on absorbtion, and clearing. Some of
the stuff I'm running in to, is for the moment beyond me, but I think I'm
getting there.

This particular article refers to how a dog's diet can influence the half
life (and other kinetic parameters) of phenobarb in the system. In
particular, the half life, and thus 'steady state' levels of phenobarb in
the system were reduced when the dog was fed a protein restricted or a fat
and protein restricted diet.

It also give some much lower values for mean half life (t 1/2) than I've
seen elsewhere (around 30 hours).

Dale

> "Dale Atkin" <labrador1@ibycus.com> said in
> alt.med.veterinary:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> How so?
Rocky - 11 Feb 2008 05:07 GMT
"Dale Atkin" <labrador1@ibycus.com> said in
alt.med.veterinary:

> This particular article refers to how a dog's diet can
> influence the half life (and other kinetic parameters) of
> phenobarb in the system. In particular, the half life, and
> thus 'steady state' levels of phenobarb in the system were
> reduced when the dog was fed a protein restricted or a fat
> and protein restricted diet.

More important than such levels, I think that such a dog needs a
consistent diet (more difficult than one first thinks).  Try
throwing Potassium Bromide into the drug and diet equation and
you'll understand why I'm so anal as to my epileptic dog's food.

Signature

--Matt.  Rocky's a Dog.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.